AI Agents That Matter
2
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the importance of AI agents and how they should be evaluated
- Discusses the need for cost-controlled and scalable evaluations of AI agents
- Emphasizes the significance of developing AI agents that can meaningfully impact the world
Plain English Explanation
This paper examines the critical role that AI agents play and the importance of evaluating them in a responsible and scalable manner. AI agents are computer programs that can perceive their environment, make decisions, and take actions to achieve specific goals. As AI systems become more advanced, it is essential to ensure that they are developed and evaluated in a way that maximizes their positive impact on the world.
The paper highlights the need for cost-controlled evaluations of AI agents, meaning that the process of assessing their capabilities should not be prohibitively expensive or resource-intensive. This is important because it allows for the widespread testing and improvement of AI systems, ultimately leading to more capable and beneficial agents. The authors also emphasize the significance of developing AI agents that can truly make a difference, rather than simply performing well on narrow, isolated tasks.
By focusing on cost-controlled and scalable evaluations, the research aims to pave the way for the creation of AI agents that can meaningfully contribute to society, tackle important problems, and improve the human condition. This aligns with the growing need for AI systems that are not only technologically advanced but also align with human values and priorities.
Technical Explanation
The paper discusses the importance of evaluating AI agents in a cost-controlled and scalable manner. The authors argue that traditional evaluation methods, which often involve complex and resource-intensive setups, are not suitable for the rapid development and widespread deployment of AI systems.
To address this challenge, the researchers propose a framework for cost-controlled AI agent evaluations. This approach emphasizes the need to design evaluation protocols that are less dependent on specialized hardware, large-scale data, or extensive human involvement. By reducing the cost and complexity of evaluations, the authors aim to enable more frequent testing and iteration, leading to the development of AI agents that can have a tangible and positive impact on the world.
The paper also highlights the significance of creating AI agents that can meaningfully contribute to society, rather than just performing well on narrow benchmarks. The authors suggest that the evaluation of AI agents should consider their broader capabilities, including their ability to adapt to new situations, collaborate with humans, and tackle complex, real-world problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the current state of AI agent evaluations and the need for more cost-effective and scalable approaches. The authors make a compelling case for the importance of developing AI agents that can truly make a difference, rather than just excelling at specific, isolated tasks.
However, the paper does not delve into the practical challenges of implementing such a framework for cost-controlled evaluations. While the high-level ideas are sound, the authors could have provided more details on the specific methods, metrics, and infrastructure required to achieve this goal.
Additionally, the paper could have addressed the potential trade-offs or limitations of this approach. For instance, it is unclear how the proposed framework would balance the need for cost-controlled evaluations with the requirement for comprehensive and rigorous assessments of AI agent capabilities.
Further research and experimentation may be needed to refine the ideas presented in this paper and ensure that the development of AI agents remains aligned with the goal of creating systems that can positively impact the world.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of developing AI agents that can make a meaningful difference in the world, and the need for cost-controlled and scalable evaluation methods to support this goal. By focusing on the creation of AI agents that can tackle complex, real-world problems in a responsible and impactful manner, the authors aim to pave the way for the advancement of AI technology that aligns with human values and priorities.
While the paper raises valid concerns and proposes a compelling framework, further research and practical implementation are needed to fully realize the vision of AI agents that truly matter. Nonetheless, this work contributes to the ongoing discourse on the responsible development and deployment of AI systems, which is crucial for ensuring that the benefits of this technology are widely shared and equitably distributed.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
2
AI Agents That Matter
Sayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Zachary S. Siegel, Nitya Nadgir, Arvind Narayanan
AI agents are an exciting new research direction, and agent development is driven by benchmarks. Our analysis of current agent benchmarks and evaluation practices reveals several shortcomings that hinder their usefulness in real-world applications. First, there is a narrow focus on accuracy without attention to other metrics. As a result, SOTA agents are needlessly complex and costly, and the community has reached mistaken conclusions about the sources of accuracy gains. Our focus on cost in addition to accuracy motivates the new goal of jointly optimizing the two metrics. We design and implement one such optimization, showing its potential to greatly reduce cost while maintaining accuracy. Second, the benchmarking needs of model and downstream developers have been conflated, making it hard to identify which agent would be best suited for a particular application. Third, many agent benchmarks have inadequate holdout sets, and sometimes none at all. This has led to agents that are fragile because they take shortcuts and overfit to the benchmark in various ways. We prescribe a principled framework for avoiding overfitting. Finally, there is a lack of standardization in evaluation practices, leading to a pervasive lack of reproducibility. We hope that the steps we introduce for addressing these shortcomings will spur the development of agents that are useful in the real world and not just accurate on benchmarks.
Read more7/2/2024
📈
1
An Interactive Agent Foundation Model
Zane Durante, Bidipta Sarkar, Ran Gong, Rohan Taori, Yusuke Noda, Paul Tang, Ehsan Adeli, Shrinidhi Kowshika Lakshmikanth, Kevin Schulman, Arnold Milstein, Demetri Terzopoulos, Ade Famoti, Noboru Kuno, Ashley Llorens, Hoi Vo, Katsu Ikeuchi, Li Fei-Fei, Jianfeng Gao, Naoki Wake, Qiuyuan Huang
The development of artificial intelligence systems is transitioning from creating static, task-specific models to dynamic, agent-based systems capable of performing well in a wide range of applications. We propose an Interactive Agent Foundation Model that uses a novel multi-task agent training paradigm for training AI agents across a wide range of domains, datasets, and tasks. Our training paradigm unifies diverse pre-training strategies, including visual masked auto-encoders, language modeling, and next-action prediction, enabling a versatile and adaptable AI framework. We demonstrate the performance of our framework across three separate domains -- Robotics, Gaming AI, and Healthcare. Our model demonstrates its ability to generate meaningful and contextually relevant outputs in each area. The strength of our approach lies in its generality, leveraging a variety of data sources such as robotics sequences, gameplay data, large-scale video datasets, and textual information for effective multimodal and multi-task learning. Our approach provides a promising avenue for developing generalist, action-taking, multimodal systems.
Read more6/18/2024
0
DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents to Becoming Data Science Experts?
Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Wenhao Yu, Kaixin Ma, Hongming Zhang, Xinya Du, Dong Yu
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive language/vision reasoning abilities, igniting the recent trend of building agents for targeted applications such as shopping assistants or AI software engineers. Recently, many data science benchmarks have been proposed to investigate their performance in the data science domain. However, existing data science benchmarks still fall short when compared to real-world data science applications due to their simplified settings. To bridge this gap, we introduce DSBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate data science agents with realistic tasks. This benchmark includes 466 data analysis tasks and 74 data modeling tasks, sourced from Eloquence and Kaggle competitions. DSBench offers a realistic setting by encompassing long contexts, multimodal task backgrounds, reasoning with large data files and multi-table structures, and performing end-to-end data modeling tasks. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs, LVLMs, and agents shows that they struggle with most tasks, with the best agent solving only 34.12% of data analysis tasks and achieving a 34.74% Relative Performance Gap (RPG). These findings underscore the need for further advancements in developing more practical, intelligent, and autonomous data science agents.
Read more9/14/2024
0
AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?
Ori Yoran, Samuel Joseph Amouyal, Chaitanya Malaviya, Ben Bogin, Ofir Press, Jonathan Berant
Language agents, built on top of language models (LMs), are systems that can interact with complex environments, such as the open web. In this work, we examine whether such agents can perform realistic and time-consuming tasks on the web, e.g., monitoring real-estate markets or locating relevant nearby businesses. We introduce AssistantBench, a challenging new benchmark consisting of 214 realistic tasks that can be automatically evaluated, covering different scenarios and domains. We find that AssistantBench exposes the limitations of current systems, including language models and retrieval-augmented language models, as no model reaches an accuracy of more than 25 points. While closed-book LMs perform well, they exhibit low precision since they tend to hallucinate facts. State-of-the-art web agents reach a score of near zero. Additionally, we introduce SeePlanAct (SPA), a new web agent that significantly outperforms previous agents, and an ensemble of SPA and closed-book models reaches the best overall performance. Moreover, we analyze failures of current systems and highlight that web navigation remains a major challenge.
Read more7/23/2024