The AI-DEC: A Card-based Design Method for User-centered AI Explanations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents the AI-DEC, a card-based design method for creating user-centered AI explanations.
- The method is intended to help designers and developers incorporate user perspectives into the design of AI systems.
- The authors conducted a user study to evaluate the usefulness of the AI-DEC method for designing AI explanations.
Plain English Explanation
The AI-DEC is a new tool that can help designers and developers create AI systems that are easier for people to understand and use. Today, many AI systems are complex and can be difficult for users to comprehend. The AI-DEC provides a structured way to incorporate the needs and perspectives of users into the design of AI explanations.
The method involves using a set of design cards that prompt designers to consider different aspects of the user experience, such as the user's goals, the level of detail they need, and potential harms the system could cause. By going through this card-based process, designers can create AI explanations that are more human-centered and tailored to the needs of the users.
The researchers evaluated the AI-DEC method by having designers use it to create AI explanations for a real-world scenario. The study found that the method helped designers better understand the user's perspective and create more effective AI explanations as a result.
Technical Explanation
The AI-DEC method is a card-based design approach that guides designers through the process of creating user-centered AI explanations. The deck of cards prompts designers to consider various aspects of the user experience, such as the user's goals, the level of detail they need, and potential harms the system could cause.
To evaluate the AI-DEC method, the researchers conducted a user study in which designers used the cards to design AI explanations for a real-world scenario involving an industrial robotics application. The designers were asked to go through the card-based process and then present their final AI explanation designs.
The study found that the AI-DEC method helped designers better understand the user's perspective and create more human-centered AI explanations. Designers reported that the cards prompted them to consider important aspects of the user experience that they might have overlooked otherwise.
Critical Analysis
The AI-DEC method represents a promising approach for incorporating user perspectives into the design of AI systems. By providing a structured way to consider various user-centered design principles, the method can help designers create AI explanations that are more accessible and meaningful to end-users.
However, the paper does not address certain limitations of the method. For example, the study only involved a single, relatively simple scenario, and it is unclear how well the AI-DEC would scale to more complex AI systems or diverse user populations. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential challenges in implementing the method in real-world product development contexts.
Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability and practicality of the AI-DEC method. Longitudinal studies examining the long-term impact of using the method, as well as comparisons to other user-centered design approaches, could provide valuable insights into its effectiveness and limitations.
Conclusion
The AI-DEC is a novel card-based design method that aims to help designers and developers create more user-centered AI explanations. By prompting designers to consider various aspects of the user experience, the method can support the development of AI systems that are more transparent, understandable, and accessible to end-users.
The study findings suggest that the AI-DEC can be a useful tool for improving the human-centeredness of AI explanations. As AI systems become increasingly pervasive in our lives, methods like the AI-DEC may play an important role in ensuring that these technologies are designed with the needs and perspectives of users in mind.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The AI-DEC: A Card-based Design Method for User-centered AI Explanations
Christine P Lee, Min Kyung Lee, Bilge Mutlu
Increasing evidence suggests that many deployed AI systems do not sufficiently support end-user interaction and information needs. Engaging end-users in the design of these systems can reveal user needs and expectations, yet effective ways of engaging end-users in the AI explanation design remain under-explored. To address this gap, we developed a design method, called AI-DEC, that defines four dimensions of AI explanations that are critical for the integration of AI systems -- communication content, modality, frequency, and direction -- and offers design examples for end-users to design AI explanations that meet their needs. We evaluated this method through co-design sessions with workers in healthcare, finance, and management industries who regularly use AI systems in their daily work. Findings indicate that the AI-DEC effectively supported workers in designing explanations that accommodated diverse levels of performance and autonomy needs, which varied depending on the AI system's workplace role and worker values. We discuss the implications of using the AI-DEC for the user-centered design of AI explanations in real-world systems.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Interaction as Explanation: A User Interaction-based Method for Explaining Image Classification Models
Hyeonggeun Yun
In computer vision, explainable AI (xAI) methods seek to mitigate the 'black-box' problem by making the decision-making process of deep learning models more interpretable and transparent. Traditional xAI methods concentrate on visualizing input features that influence model predictions, providing insights primarily suited for experts. In this work, we present an interaction-based xAI method that enhances user comprehension of image classification models through their interaction. Thus, we developed a web-based prototype allowing users to modify images via painting and erasing, thereby observing changes in classification results. Our approach enables users to discern critical features influencing the model's decision-making process, aligning their mental models with the model's logic. Experiments conducted with five images demonstrate the potential of the method to reveal feature importance through user interaction. Our work contributes a novel perspective to xAI by centering on end-user engagement and understanding, paving the way for more intuitive and accessible explainability in AI systems.
Read more8/15/2024
🤖
0
Explaining AI Decisions: Towards Achieving Human-Centered Explainability in Smart Home Environments
Md Shajalal, Alexander Boden, Gunnar Stevens, Delong Du, Dean-Robin Kern
Smart home systems are gaining popularity as homeowners strive to enhance their living and working environments while minimizing energy consumption. However, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision-making models in smart home systems faces challenges due to the complexity and black-box nature of these systems, leading to concerns about explainability, trust, transparency, accountability, and fairness. The emerging field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) addresses these issues by providing explanations for the models' decisions and actions. While state-of-the-art XAI methods are beneficial for AI developers and practitioners, they may not be easily understood by general users, particularly household members. This paper advocates for human-centered XAI methods, emphasizing the importance of delivering readily comprehensible explanations to enhance user satisfaction and drive the adoption of smart home systems. We review state-of-the-art XAI methods and prior studies focusing on human-centered explanations for general users in the context of smart home applications. Through experiments on two smart home application scenarios, we demonstrate that explanations generated by prominent XAI techniques might not be effective in helping users understand and make decisions. We thus argue for the necessity of a human-centric approach in representing explanations in smart home systems and highlight relevant human-computer interaction (HCI) methodologies, including user studies, prototyping, technology probes analysis, and heuristic evaluation, that can be employed to generate and present human-centered explanations to users.
Read more4/26/2024
🤿
0
The Drawback of Insight: Detailed Explanations Can Reduce Agreement with XAI
Sabid Bin Habib Pias, Alicia Freel, Timothy Trammel, Taslima Akter, Donald Williamson, Apu Kapadia
With the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based decision-making, explanations help increase new technology adoption through enhanced trust and reliability. However, our experimental study challenges the notion that every user universally values explanations. We argue that the agreement with AI suggestions, whether accompanied by explanations or not, is influenced by individual differences in personality traits and the users' comfort with technology. We found that people with higher neuroticism and lower technological comfort showed more agreement with the recommendations without explanations. As more users become exposed to eXplainable AI (XAI) and AI-based systems, we argue that the XAI design should not provide explanations for users with high neuroticism and low technology comfort. Prioritizing user personalities in XAI systems will help users become better collaborators of AI systems.
Read more5/1/2024