Explaining AI Decisions: Towards Achieving Human-Centered Explainability in Smart Home Environments
2404.16074
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Smart home systems are gaining popularity as homeowners strive to enhance their living and working environments while minimizing energy consumption. However, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision-making models in smart home systems faces challenges due to the complexity and black-box nature of these systems, leading to concerns about explainability, trust, transparency, accountability, and fairness. The emerging field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) addresses these issues by providing explanations for the models' decisions and actions. While state-of-the-art XAI methods are beneficial for AI developers and practitioners, they may not be easily understood by general users, particularly household members. This paper advocates for human-centered XAI methods, emphasizing the importance of delivering readily comprehensible explanations to enhance user satisfaction and drive the adoption of smart home systems. We review state-of-the-art XAI methods and prior studies focusing on human-centered explanations for general users in the context of smart home applications. Through experiments on two smart home application scenarios, we demonstrate that explanations generated by prominent XAI techniques might not be effective in helping users understand and make decisions. We thus argue for the necessity of a human-centric approach in representing explanations in smart home systems and highlight relevant human-computer interaction (HCI) methodologies, including user studies, prototyping, technology probes analysis, and heuristic evaluation, that can be employed to generate and present human-centered explanations to users.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Smart home systems are becoming more popular as people aim to enhance their living and working environments while reducing energy use.
- However, the adoption of AI-powered decision-making models in smart home systems faces challenges due to their complexity and lack of transparency.
- Explainable AI (XAI) addresses these issues by providing explanations for the models' decisions and actions.
- While XAI benefits AI developers and practitioners, the explanations may not be easily understood by general users, including household members.
- This paper advocates for human-centered XAI methods to deliver readily comprehensible explanations that can enhance user satisfaction and drive the adoption of smart home systems.
Plain English Explanation
As people continue to look for ways to make their homes more comfortable and efficient, smart home systems have become increasingly popular. These systems use advanced technology, including artificial intelligence (AI), to automate and optimize various aspects of the home, such as lighting, temperature, and energy use.
However, the use of AI-powered decision-making models in smart home systems has faced some challenges. These models can be quite complex and operate in a "black-box" manner, meaning it's not always clear how they arrive at their decisions. This can lead to concerns about explainability, trust, transparency, accountability, and fairness among users.
To address these issues, researchers have developed a field called explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), which focuses on providing explanations for the decisions and actions of AI models. While XAI methods are beneficial for AI developers and experts, the explanations they generate may not be easily understood by the average homeowner or household member.
This paper argues that a more human-centered approach to XAI is needed to ensure that the explanations provided by smart home systems are readily comprehensible to users. By making the explanations more accessible and understandable, the researchers believe this can enhance user satisfaction and drive the broader adoption of these smart home technologies.
Technical Explanation
The paper reviews the state-of-the-art XAI methods and prior studies that have focused on delivering human-centered explanations for general users in the context of smart home applications. Through experiments on two smart home application scenarios, the researchers demonstrate that explanations generated by prominent XAI techniques may not be effective in helping users understand and make decisions.
The researchers conducted user studies, prototyping, technology probes analysis, and heuristic evaluation to generate and present human-centered explanations to users. These human-computer interaction (HCI) methodologies were employed to ensure that the explanations provided by the smart home systems were readily comprehensible and aligned with the needs and expectations of the users.
The findings from the experiments suggest that a human-centric approach is necessary for representing explanations in smart home systems. The researchers argue that this approach can help enhance user satisfaction and drive the broader adoption of these technologies, which have the potential to improve living and working environments while reducing energy consumption.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of human-centered XAI methods in the context of smart home systems. The researchers have identified a crucial gap between the complexity of state-of-the-art XAI techniques and the needs of general users, which can hinder the widespread adoption of these technologies.
One potential limitation of the research is the scope of the experiments, which focused on two specific smart home application scenarios. While these scenarios provide valuable insights, it would be beneficial to explore a wider range of smart home use cases to further validate the researchers' findings and recommendations.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential challenges or trade-offs involved in developing human-centered XAI methods. For example, balancing the level of detail and complexity in the explanations, or addressing the diverse needs and preferences of different user groups, may require careful consideration and further research.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper's focus on human-centered XAI is a crucial step towards enhancing the transparency, trust, and adoption of smart home systems. By prioritizing the needs and understanding of users, the researchers are laying the groundwork for a more inclusive and accessible approach to AI-powered home technologies.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of human-centered XAI methods in the context of smart home systems. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more prevalent in households, it is essential to ensure that the decision-making processes of the underlying AI models are transparent and easily understood by general users.
The researchers' emphasis on delivering readily comprehensible explanations to enhance user satisfaction and drive the adoption of smart home systems is a significant contribution to the field. By leveraging human-computer interaction methodologies, the paper demonstrates the value of a user-centric approach in representing explanations and fostering trust in these advanced home technologies.
As the smart home ecosystem continues to grow, the insights and recommendations from this paper can serve as a valuable guide for researchers, developers, and policymakers working to create more inclusive and user-friendly AI-powered home systems that prioritize the needs and understanding of all users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024
Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
Fatima Ezzeddine
0
0
Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.
6/26/2024
🤿
The Drawback of Insight: Detailed Explanations Can Reduce Agreement with XAI
Sabid Bin Habib Pias, Alicia Freel, Timothy Trammel, Taslima Akter, Donald Williamson, Apu Kapadia
0
0
With the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based decision-making, explanations help increase new technology adoption through enhanced trust and reliability. However, our experimental study challenges the notion that every user universally values explanations. We argue that the agreement with AI suggestions, whether accompanied by explanations or not, is influenced by individual differences in personality traits and the users' comfort with technology. We found that people with higher neuroticism and lower technological comfort showed more agreement with the recommendations without explanations. As more users become exposed to eXplainable AI (XAI) and AI-based systems, we argue that the XAI design should not provide explanations for users with high neuroticism and low technology comfort. Prioritizing user personalities in XAI systems will help users become better collaborators of AI systems.
5/1/2024
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
0
0
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
6/13/2024