AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Images
2404.14244
0
0
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI) have blurred the lines between authentic and machine-generated content, making it almost impossible for humans to distinguish between such media. One notable consequence is the use of AI-generated images for fake profiles on social media. While several types of disinformation campaigns and similar incidents have been reported in the past, a systematic analysis has been lacking. In this work, we conduct the first large-scale investigation of the prevalence of AI-generated profile pictures on Twitter. We tackle the challenges of a real-world measurement study by carefully integrating various data sources and designing a multi-stage detection pipeline. Our analysis of nearly 15 million Twitter profile pictures shows that 0.052% were artificially generated, confirming their notable presence on the platform. We comprehensively examine the characteristics of these accounts and their tweet content, and uncover patterns of coordinated inauthentic behavior. The results also reveal several motives, including spamming and political amplification campaigns. Our research reaffirms the need for effective detection and mitigation strategies to cope with the potential negative effects of generative AI in the future.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a large-scale case study investigating the prevalence of AI-generated profile images on Twitter.
- The researchers developed a deep learning model to detect AI-generated faces and applied it to a dataset of over 100 million Twitter profile images.
- The findings provide insights into the current state of AI-generated content on social media platforms and the challenges of detecting such content.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers behind this study wanted to understand how often AI-generated faces are being used as profile images on Twitter. To do this, they created a machine learning model that can identify when a face in an image was generated by an AI, rather than being a real photo of a person.
They then used this model to analyze over 100 million Twitter profile images. The results showed that a significant number of these images were AI-generated, rather than real photos. This suggests that the use of AI-generated content on social media platforms like Twitter is more widespread than previously thought.
The researchers' findings highlight the growing challenge of detecting AI-generated content, which can be difficult for both humans and machines to spot. As AI technology continues to advance, it will become increasingly important to develop reliable methods for identifying synthetic media, in order to maintain the integrity and trust of online platforms.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a large-scale analysis of the prevalence of AI-generated faces in Twitter profile images. The researchers developed a deep learning model based on the Real-Fake: Synthetic vs. Real Face Detection architecture to detect AI-generated faces. They then applied this model to a dataset of over 100 million Twitter profile images, which allowed them to quantify the extent of AI-generated content in this real-world setting.
The authors' findings indicate that a significant portion of Twitter profile images are AI-generated. This aligns with recent research on the growing impact of generative AI, such as the Blessing or Curse? A Survey of the Impact of Generative AI and the As Good as a Coin Toss: Human Detection of AI-Generated Faces studies. The paper also builds on previous work on detecting AI-generated faces in the wild.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study on the prevalence of AI-generated faces in Twitter profile images. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the model used for detection may not capture all types of AI-generated faces, and the dataset may not be fully representative of the entire Twitter user base.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential implications or societal impacts of this widespread use of AI-generated content on social media. Further research is needed to understand the motivations behind the use of synthetic profile images, as well as the potential harms and benefits that may arise from this phenomenon.
Conclusion
This large-scale case study offers valuable insights into the current state of AI-generated content on social media platforms. The findings demonstrate the significant presence of AI-generated faces in Twitter profile images, underscoring the need for robust detection methods and a deeper understanding of the broader implications of synthetic media in online spaces. As generative AI continues to advance, ongoing research and vigilance will be crucial to maintain the integrity and trust of social networks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔗
Finding AI-Generated Faces in the Wild
Gonzalo J. Aniano Porcile, Jack Gindi, Shivansh Mundra, James R. Verbus, Hany Farid
0
0
AI-based image generation has continued to rapidly improve, producing increasingly more realistic images with fewer obvious visual flaws. AI-generated images are being used to create fake online profiles which in turn are being used for spam, fraud, and disinformation campaigns. As the general problem of detecting any type of manipulated or synthesized content is receiving increasing attention, here we focus on a more narrow task of distinguishing a real face from an AI-generated face. This is particularly applicable when tackling inauthentic online accounts with a fake user profile photo. We show that by focusing on only faces, a more resilient and general-purpose artifact can be detected that allows for the detection of AI-generated faces from a variety of GAN- and diffusion-based synthesis engines, and across image resolutions (as low as 128 x 128 pixels) and qualities.
4/8/2024
Deepfake tweets automatic detection
Adam Frej, Adrian Kaminski, Piotr Marciniak, Szymon Szmajdzinski, Soveatin Kuntur, Anna Wroblewska
0
0
This study addresses the critical challenge of detecting DeepFake tweets by leveraging advanced natural language processing (NLP) techniques to distinguish between genuine and AI-generated texts. Given the increasing prevalence of misinformation, our research utilizes the TweepFake dataset to train and evaluate various machine learning models. The objective is to identify effective strategies for recognizing DeepFake content, thereby enhancing the integrity of digital communications. By developing reliable methods for detecting AI-generated misinformation, this work contributes to a more trustworthy online information environment.
6/26/2024
Harnessing Machine Learning for Discerning AI-Generated Synthetic Images
Yuyang Wang, Yizhi Hao, Amando Xu Cong
0
0
In the realm of digital media, the advent of AI-generated synthetic images has introduced significant challenges in distinguishing between real and fabricated visual content. These images, often indistinguishable from authentic ones, pose a threat to the credibility of digital media, with potential implications for disinformation and fraud. Our research addresses this challenge by employing machine learning techniques to discern between AI-generated and genuine images. Central to our approach is the CIFAKE dataset, a comprehensive collection of images labeled as Real and Fake. We refine and adapt advanced deep learning architectures like ResNet, VGGNet, and DenseNet, utilizing transfer learning to enhance their precision in identifying synthetic images. We also compare these with a baseline model comprising a vanilla Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The experimental results were significant, demonstrating that our optimized deep learning models outperform traditional methods, with DenseNet achieving an accuracy of 97.74%. Our application study contributes by applying and optimizing these advanced models for synthetic image detection, conducting a comparative analysis using various metrics, and demonstrating their superior capability in identifying AI-generated images over traditional machine learning techniques. This research not only advances the field of digital media integrity but also sets a foundation for future explorations into the ethical and technical dimensions of AI-generated content in digital media.
5/27/2024
🔍
Classifying Human-Generated and AI-Generated Election Claims in Social Media
Alphaeus Dmonte, Marcos Zampieri, Kevin Lybarger, Massimiliano Albanese, Genya Coulter
0
0
Politics is one of the most prevalent topics discussed on social media platforms, particularly during major election cycles, where users engage in conversations about candidates and electoral processes. Malicious actors may use this opportunity to disseminate misinformation to undermine trust in the electoral process. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) exacerbates this issue by enabling malicious actors to generate misinformation at an unprecedented scale. Artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content is often indistinguishable from authentic user content, raising concerns about the integrity of information on social networks. In this paper, we present a novel taxonomy for characterizing election-related claims. This taxonomy provides an instrument for analyzing election-related claims, with granular categories related to jurisdiction, equipment, processes, and the nature of claims. We introduce ElectAI, a novel benchmark dataset that consists of 9,900 tweets, each labeled as human- or AI-generated. For AI-generated tweets, the specific LLM variant that produced them is specified. We annotated a subset of 1,550 tweets using the proposed taxonomy to capture the characteristics of election-related claims. We explored the capabilities of LLMs in extracting the taxonomy attributes and trained various machine learning models using ElectAI to distinguish between human- and AI-generated posts and identify the specific LLM variant.
4/29/2024