Deepfake tweets automatic detection
2406.16489
0
0
Abstract
This study addresses the critical challenge of detecting DeepFake tweets by leveraging advanced natural language processing (NLP) techniques to distinguish between genuine and AI-generated texts. Given the increasing prevalence of misinformation, our research utilizes the TweepFake dataset to train and evaluate various machine learning models. The objective is to identify effective strategies for recognizing DeepFake content, thereby enhancing the integrity of digital communications. By developing reliable methods for detecting AI-generated misinformation, this work contributes to a more trustworthy online information environment.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for automatically detecting deepfake tweets, which are tweets containing synthetic or manipulated media generated using AI technology.
- The research was funded by the European Union's Horizon Europe program and the Polish Ministry of Education and Science.
- The work was carried out with the support of the Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science at Warsaw University of Technology and its High-Performance Computing Center.
Plain English Explanation
Deepfake technology has become increasingly sophisticated, allowing for the creation of fake images, videos, and even tweets that can be difficult to distinguish from the real thing. This poses a significant challenge, as the spread of misinformation and manipulated media can have serious consequences for individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.
To address this issue, the researchers in this study developed a method to automatically detect deepfake tweets. By analyzing the content, metadata, and other characteristics of tweets, their system can identify those that are likely to be synthetic or manipulated, rather than authentic. This can help social media platforms and users identify and mitigate the spread of deepfake content, promoting the dissemination of accurate information and preserving the integrity of online discourse.
Technical Explanation
The researchers employed a machine learning approach to develop their deepfake tweet detection system. They trained their model on a large dataset of both authentic and deepfake tweets, using a variety of features, including textual, metadata, and behavioral characteristics.
The model was designed to detect whether a given tweet was generated by a human or an AI system, using a hybrid approach that combines multiple techniques to enhance its accuracy and robustness.
Through extensive testing and evaluation, the researchers demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach in accurately identifying deepfake tweets in a variety of real-world scenarios.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling and well-designed solution to the pressing problem of deepfake detection on social media platforms. However, the authors acknowledge that their system is not infallible and that further research is needed to address the evolving nature of deepfake technology and the potential for adversarial attacks.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the broader ethical and societal implications of deepfake detection, such as the potential for abuse or the impact on individual privacy and freedom of expression. These are important considerations that warrant further exploration and discussion.
Conclusion
This research represents a significant step forward in the ongoing battle against the spread of misinformation and manipulated media on social media. By developing a robust and effective deepfake tweet detection system, the researchers have provided a valuable tool that can help social media platforms and users identify and mitigate the impact of synthetic content.
While challenges and limitations remain, this work highlights the potential of machine learning and other advanced techniques to address the complex and evolving problem of deepfakes. As the technology behind deepfakes continues to advance, the need for innovative solutions like this one will only become more pressing, making this research a valuable contribution to the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Deepfake Text Detection in the Wild
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection to mitigate risks like the spread of fake news and plagiarism. Existing research has been constrained by evaluating detection methods on specific domains or particular language models. In practical scenarios, however, the detector faces texts from various domains or LLMs without knowing their sources. To this end, we build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Empirical results show challenges in distinguishing machine-generated texts from human-authored ones across various scenarios, especially out-of-distribution. These challenges are due to the decreasing linguistic distinctions between the two sources. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. We release our resources at https://github.com/yafuly/MAGE.
5/22/2024
🔎
Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models
Jinyan Su, Claire Cardie, Preslav Nakov
0
0
In the age of large language models (LLMs) and the widespread adoption of AI-driven content creation, the landscape of information dissemination has witnessed a paradigm shift. With the proliferation of both human-written and machine-generated real and fake news, robustly and effectively discerning the veracity of news articles has become an intricate challenge. While substantial research has been dedicated to fake news detection, this either assumes that all news articles are human-written or abruptly assumes that all machine-generated news are fake. Thus, a significant gap exists in understanding the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news. In this paper, we study this gap by conducting a comprehensive evaluation of fake news detectors trained in various scenarios. Our primary objectives revolve around the following pivotal question: How to adapt fake news detectors to the era of LLMs? Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa. Moreover, due to the bias of detectors against machine-generated texts cite{su2023fake}, they should be trained on datasets with a lower machine-generated news ratio than the test set. Building on our findings, we provide a practical strategy for the development of robust fake news detectors.
4/16/2024
AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Images
Jonas Ricker, Dennis Assenmacher, Thorsten Holz, Asja Fischer, Erwin Quiring
0
0
Recent advances in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI) have blurred the lines between authentic and machine-generated content, making it almost impossible for humans to distinguish between such media. One notable consequence is the use of AI-generated images for fake profiles on social media. While several types of disinformation campaigns and similar incidents have been reported in the past, a systematic analysis has been lacking. In this work, we conduct the first large-scale investigation of the prevalence of AI-generated profile pictures on Twitter. We tackle the challenges of a real-world measurement study by carefully integrating various data sources and designing a multi-stage detection pipeline. Our analysis of nearly 15 million Twitter profile pictures shows that 0.052% were artificially generated, confirming their notable presence on the platform. We comprehensively examine the characteristics of these accounts and their tweet content, and uncover patterns of coordinated inauthentic behavior. The results also reveal several motives, including spamming and political amplification campaigns. Our research reaffirms the need for effective detection and mitigation strategies to cope with the potential negative effects of generative AI in the future.
4/23/2024
Enhancing Text Authenticity: A Novel Hybrid Approach for AI-Generated Text Detection
Ye Zhang, Qian Leng, Mengran Zhu, Rui Ding, Yue Wu, Jintong Song, Yulu Gong
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has ushered in an era where AI-generated text is increasingly indistinguishable from human-generated content. Detecting AI-generated text has become imperative to combat misinformation, ensure content authenticity, and safeguard against malicious uses of AI. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid approach that combines traditional TF-IDF techniques with advanced machine learning models, including Bayesian classifiers, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost), and 12 instances of Deberta-v3-large models. Our approach aims to address the challenges associated with detecting AI-generated text by leveraging the strengths of both traditional feature extraction methods and state-of-the-art deep learning models. Through extensive experiments on a comprehensive dataset, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in accurately distinguishing between human and AI-generated text. Our approach achieves superior performance compared to existing methods. This research contributes to the advancement of AI-generated text detection techniques and lays the foundation for developing robust solutions to mitigate the challenges posed by AI-generated content.
6/12/2024