AI for Mathematics Mathematical Formalized Problem Solving and Theorem Proving in Different Fields in Lean4
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Formalizing mathematical theorems using computerized languages like Lean 4 can significantly impact mathematical formalization.
- Lean 4 has great potential for advancing mathematical reasoning, but existing efforts are limited to online corpora and keeping pace with rapidly evolving languages.
- The approach involves generating formal steps and complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs to bridge the gap between traditional and computerized proof.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores using Lean 4, a computerized formal language, to prove mathematical theorems. Lean 4 offers exciting possibilities for improving how we reason about and formalize mathematical concepts. However, current efforts are constrained to the mathematical formalization languages available in substantial online databases, and they are focused on keeping up with the rapid evolution of these languages.
To address this, the researchers propose a new approach that involves using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate formal steps and complete proofs based on natural language (NL) proofs. The idea is to introduce the basic structure and tactics of Lean 4, determine how AI can assist the mathematical formalization process to enhance its performance, and provide examples of solving problems in Lean 4 compared to NL, primarily in the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) and a sample theorem in abstract algebra.
Technical Explanation
The paper aims to bridge the gap between traditional and computerized proof by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate formal steps and complete proofs from natural language (NL) proofs.
The researchers first introduce the basic structure and tactics of Lean 4, a prominent computerized formal language for mathematical reasoning. They then explore how AI, in the form of LLMs, can assist the mathematical formalization process to improve its performance.
To demonstrate the potential of this approach, the paper provides examples of solving problems in Lean 4 and comparing the results to NL proofs, particularly focusing on the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) and a sample theorem in abstract algebra.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights the significant potential of using computerized formal languages like Lean 4 to formalize mathematical theorems, but it also acknowledges the limitations of current efforts. By leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate formal proofs from natural language, the researchers aim to bridge the gap between traditional and computerized proof and advance the field of mathematical reasoning.
While the proposed approach is promising, the paper does not delve into the potential challenges or limitations of using LLMs for this task. Generating accurate and reliable formal proofs from natural language inputs may require overcoming significant technical hurdles, and the researchers could have discussed these in more detail.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the broader implications of this research, such as the impact on mathematical education, collaboration between human and AI mathematicians, or the potential for automating complex mathematical reasoning tasks.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to formalizing mathematical theorems using computerized formal languages like Lean 4. By leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate formal proofs from natural language inputs, the researchers aim to bridge the gap between traditional and computerized proof and unlock new possibilities for advancing mathematical reasoning.
The examples provided, particularly in the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) and abstract algebra, demonstrate the potential of this approach. While the paper acknowledges the limitations of current efforts, it highlights the exciting opportunities for using AI to enhance the mathematical formalization process and drive progress in this important field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
AI for Mathematics Mathematical Formalized Problem Solving and Theorem Proving in Different Fields in Lean4
Xichen Tang
Using computerized verifiable formal languages like Lean 4 to prove mathematical theorems has a significant impact on mathematical formalization. Lean 4 offers prominent potential for advancing mathematical reasoning. However, existing efforts are limited to mathematical formalization languages in substantial online corpora and are dedicated to keeping pace with rapidly evolving languages. To bridge the gap between the traditional and computerized proof, my approach to formalizing theorem proving involves generating formal steps and complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs. The method is to introduce the basic structure and tactics in general, determine how AI can assist the mathematical formalization process to improve its performance, and give examples of solving problems in Lean 4 comparing to NL, mainly in IMO, and a sample theorem proving in abstract algebra.
Read more9/11/2024
0
TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts
Ruida Wang, Jipeng Zhang, Yizhen Jia, Rui Pan, Shizhe Diao, Renjie Pi, Tong Zhang
Proving mathematical theorems using computer-verifiable formal languages like Lean significantly impacts mathematical reasoning. One approach to formal theorem proving involves generating complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs. Similar methods have shown promising results in code generation. However, most modern LLMs exhibit suboptimal performance due to the scarcity of aligned NL and Formal Language (FL) theorem-proving data. This scarcity results in a paucity of methodologies for training LLMs and techniques to fully utilize their capabilities in composing formal proofs. To address the challenges, this paper proposes **TheoremLlama**, an end-to-end framework to train a general-purpose LLM to become a Lean4 expert. This framework encompasses NL-FL aligned dataset generation methods, training approaches for the LLM formal theorem prover, and techniques for LLM Lean4 proof writing. Using the dataset generation method, we provide *Open Bootstrapped Theorems* (OBT), an NL-FL aligned and bootstrapped dataset. A key innovation in this framework is the NL-FL bootstrapping method, where NL proofs are integrated into Lean4 code for training datasets, leveraging the NL reasoning ability of LLMs for formal reasoning. The **TheoremLlama** framework achieves cumulative accuracies of 36.48% and 33.61% on MiniF2F-Valid and Test datasets respectively, surpassing the GPT-4 baseline of 22.95% and 25.41%. We have also open-sourced our model checkpoints and generated dataset, and will soon make all the code publicly available.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problems
Huaiyuan Ying, Zijian Wu, Yihan Geng, Jiayu Wang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
Large language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various natural language processing tasks, especially in solving mathematical problems. However, large language models are not good at math theorem proving using formal languages like Lean. A significant challenge in this area is the scarcity of training data available in these formal languages. To address this issue, we propose a novel pipeline that iteratively generates and filters synthetic data to translate natural language mathematical problems into Lean 4 statements, and vice versa. Our results indicate that the synthetic data pipeline can provide useful training data and improve the performance of LLMs in translating and understanding complex mathematical problems and proofs. Our final dataset contains about 57K formal-informal question pairs along with searched proof from the math contest forum and 21 new IMO questions. We open-source our code at https://github.com/InternLM/InternLM-Math and our data at https://huggingface.co/datasets/InternLM/Lean-Workbook.
Read more6/10/2024
🤯
0
A New Approach Towards Autoformalization
Nilay Patel, Rahul Saha, Jeffrey Flanigan
Verifying mathematical proofs is difficult, but can be automated with the assistance of a computer. Autoformalization is the task of automatically translating natural language mathematics into a formal language that can be verified by a program. This is a challenging task, and especially for higher-level mathematics found in research papers. Research paper mathematics requires large amounts of background and context. In this paper, we propose an avenue towards tackling autoformalization for research-level mathematics, by breaking the task into easier and more approachable subtasks: unlinked formalization (formalization with unlinked definitions and theorems), entity linking (linking to the proper theorems and definitions), and finally adjusting types so it passes the type checker. In addition, we present arXiv2Formal, a benchmark dataset for unlinked formalization consisting of 50 theorems formalized for the Lean theorem prover sampled from papers on arXiv.org. We welcome any contributions from the community to future versions of this dataset.
Read more7/11/2024