The GPT Surprise: Offering Large Language Model Chat in a Massive Coding Class Reduced Engagement but Increased Adopters Exam Performances
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers conducted a large-scale study to assess the impact of using a chat interface powered by a large language model (LLM) like GPT-4 in an online coding class.
- They provided some students with access to the chat interface and measured its effects on exam performance and course engagement.
- The study found potential benefits for students who used the tool, but also observed significant decreases in exam participation and other forms of course engagement overall.
- The impact varied based on the student's country of origin, with offering access to LLMs increasing exam participation for students from countries with low human development indices.
Plain English Explanation
Researchers [explored the impact of using large language model (LLM) chat interfaces, like ChatGPT and Copilot, in an online coding class](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/experiences-from-integrating-large-language-model-chatbots). These types of AI-powered tools are becoming widely available to students and teachers around the world, but not much research has been done on how they affect student learning, especially in technical fields like coding.
The researchers set up an experiment where they gave some students in the class access to a chat interface powered by GPT-4, a powerful LLM. They then looked at how this affected the students' exam performance and overall engagement in the course.
The results were mixed. For the students who actually used the chat tool, the researchers saw potential benefits in their exam scores. However, when they looked at all the students in the class, they found that simply offering access to the LLM-powered chat led to a significant decrease in exam participation and other forms of course engagement.
Interestingly, this impact was different depending on the students' home countries. For students from countries with lower human development indices, offering access to the LLM-powered chat actually increased their exam participation rates.
Overall, the researchers found that while LLM-powered tools like the chat interface could potentially benefit students in certain ways, they also pose risks in terms of decreased engagement. The long-term impact on student success is still unclear. The researchers recommend further investigation to better understand how these technologies can be integrated into classrooms in a way that supports student learning.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a large-scale randomized control trial with 5,831 students from 146 countries enrolled in an online coding class. They provided some students with access to a chat interface powered by the GPT-4 large language model (LLM).
To measure the impact of this LLM-powered chat tool, the researchers looked at two key outcomes: exam performance and overall course engagement. For exam performance, they compared the scores of students who used the chat tool (the "adopters") to those who did not.
For course engagement, the researchers tracked various metrics, such as exam participation rates and other forms of participation, across all students in the class. They also looked at how the impact varied based on the students' countries of origin, using the human development index (HDI) as a proxy for the students' educational and socioeconomic backgrounds.
The results showed that the students who used the LLM-powered chat tool (the adopters) had positive benefits in terms of exam performance. However, when looking at the class as a whole, the researchers found that simply offering access to the LLM-powered chat led to a significant decrease in exam participation and other forms of course engagement.
Interestingly, this negative impact on engagement was modulated by the students' countries of origin. Offering access to the LLM-powered chat increased the exam participation rate for students from countries with low HDI, suggesting that these tools may be more beneficial for students with fewer educational resources.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations to their study. First, they note that the long-term impact of integrating LLM-powered tools into classrooms is still unclear. While they observed potential benefits for adopters in the short term, the overall decrease in engagement could have negative consequences for student success in the long run.
Additionally, the researchers did not investigate the specific ways in which students were using the chat tool, or the types of interactions they had with it. This makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the underlying mechanisms driving the observed effects.
Another potential limitation is the use of exam performance as the primary outcome measure. While exams are a common way to assess student learning, they may not capture the full range of skills and knowledge gained in the course.
The researchers also highlight the need for further research to better understand the impact of LLM-powered tools on students from different educational and socioeconomic backgrounds. The observed differences based on country of origin suggest that these tools may have differential effects on different student populations.
Overall, the study raises important questions about the potential risks and benefits of integrating LLM-powered tools into educational settings, particularly in technical fields like coding. The researchers encourage continued investigation in this area to help inform the responsible and effective use of these technologies in the classroom.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the potential impact of integrating large language model (LLM)-powered chat interfaces, like ChatGPT and Copilot, into online coding education. While the researchers found potential benefits for students who used the LLM-powered chat tool, they also observed significant decreases in exam participation and other forms of course engagement across the entire class.
The study highlights the need for further investigation to understand the complex and nuanced effects of these technologies on student learning, particularly in technical subjects like coding. As LLM-powered tools become more widely available and integrated into educational settings, it will be crucial to carefully assess their impacts and ensure they are used in ways that support and enhance student success.
The researchers' findings suggest that the integration of LLM-powered tools may have differential effects on students from different educational and socioeconomic backgrounds. This underscores the importance of considering equity and accessibility when introducing these technologies into the classroom.
Overall, this study represents an important step in understanding the experiences of integrating large language model chatbots into learning experiences and highlights the need for continued research and thoughtful implementation to maximize the benefits and mitigate the potential risks of these rapidly evolving technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
The GPT Surprise: Offering Large Language Model Chat in a Massive Coding Class Reduced Engagement but Increased Adopters Exam Performances
Allen Nie, Yash Chandak, Miroslav Suzara, Malika Ali, Juliette Woodrow, Matt Peng, Mehran Sahami, Emma Brunskill, Chris Piech
Large language models (LLMs) are quickly being adopted in a wide range of learning experiences, especially via ubiquitous and broadly accessible chat interfaces like ChatGPT and Copilot. This type of interface is readily available to students and teachers around the world, yet relatively little research has been done to assess the impact of such generic tools on student learning. Coding education is an interesting test case, both because LLMs have strong performance on coding tasks, and because LLM-powered support tools are rapidly becoming part of the workflow of professional software engineers. To help understand the impact of generic LLM use on coding education, we conducted a large-scale randomized control trial with 5,831 students from 146 countries in an online coding class in which we provided some students with access to a chat interface with GPT-4. We estimate positive benefits on exam performance for adopters, the students who used the tool, but over all students, the advertisement of GPT-4 led to a significant average decrease in exam participation. We observe similar decreases in other forms of course engagement. However, this decrease is modulated by the student's country of origin. Offering access to LLMs to students from low human development index countries increased their exam participation rate on average. Our results suggest there may be promising benefits to using LLMs in an introductory coding class, but also potential harms for engagement, which makes their longer term impact on student success unclear. Our work highlights the need for additional investigations to help understand the potential impact of future adoption and integration of LLMs into classrooms.
Read more7/16/2024
💬
0
Experiences from Integrating Large Language Model Chatbots into the Classroom
Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Leo Leppanen
In the present study, we provided students an unfiltered access to a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM) chatbot. The chatbot was intentionally designed to mimic proprietary commercial chatbots such as ChatGPT where the chatbot has not been tailored for the educational context; the underlying engine was OpenAI GPT-4. The chatbot was integrated into online learning materials of three courses. One of the courses focused on software engineering with LLMs, while the two other courses were not directly related to LLMs. Our results suggest that only a minority of students engage with the chatbot in the courses that do not relate to LLMs. At the same time, unsurprisingly, nearly all students in the LLM-focused course leveraged the chatbot. In all courses, the majority of the LLM usage came from a few superusers, whereas the majority of the students did not heavily use the chatbot even though it was readily available and effectively provided a free access to the OpenAI GPT-4 model. We also observe that in addition to students using the chatbot for course-specific purposes, many use the chatbot for their own purposes. These results suggest that the worst fears of educators -- all students overrelying on LLMs -- did not materialize even when the chatbot access was unfiltered. We finally discuss potential reasons for the low usage, suggesting the need for more tailored and scaffolded LLM experiences targeted for specific types of student use cases.
Read more6/10/2024
💬
0
The Future of Learning: Large Language Models through the Lens of Students
He Zhang, Jingyi Xie, Chuhao Wu, Jie Cai, ChanMin Kim, John M. Carroll
As Large-Scale Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they demonstrate significant enhancements in performance and an expansion of functionalities, impacting various domains, including education. In this study, we conducted interviews with 14 students to explore their everyday interactions with ChatGPT. Our preliminary findings reveal that students grapple with the dilemma of utilizing ChatGPT's efficiency for learning and information seeking, while simultaneously experiencing a crisis of trust and ethical concerns regarding the outcomes and broader impacts of ChatGPT. The students perceive ChatGPT as being more human-like compared to traditional AI. This dilemma, characterized by mixed emotions, inconsistent behaviors, and an overall positive attitude towards ChatGPT, underscores its potential for beneficial applications in education and learning. However, we argue that despite its human-like qualities, the advanced capabilities of such intelligence might lead to adverse consequences. Therefore, it's imperative to approach its application cautiously and strive to mitigate potential harms in future developments.
Read more7/18/2024
1
New!AI Meets the Classroom: When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
Matthias Lehmann, Philipp B. Cornelius, Fabian J. Sting
In this paper, we study how generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs) impact learning in coding classes. We show across three studies that LLM usage can have positive and negative effects on learning outcomes. Using observational data from university-level programming courses, we establish such effects in the field. We replicate these findings in subsequent experimental studies, which closely resemble typical learning scenarios, to show causality. We find evidence for two contrasting mechanisms that determine the overall effect of LLM usage on learning. Students who use LLMs as personal tutors by conversing about the topic and asking for explanations benefit from usage. However, learning is impaired for students who excessively rely on LLMs to solve practice exercises for them and thus do not invest sufficient own mental effort. Those who never used LLMs before are particularly prone to such adverse behavior. Students without prior domain knowledge gain more from having access to LLMs. Finally, we show that the self-perceived benefits of using LLMs for learning exceed the actual benefits, potentially resulting in an overestimation of one's own abilities. Overall, our findings show promising potential of LLMs as learning support, however also that students have to be very cautious of possible pitfalls.
Read more9/17/2024