Algebraic Adversarial Attacks on Integrated Gradients
0
🎲
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how adversarial attacks can be used to undermine the reliability of integrated gradients, a popular technique for explaining the predictions of machine learning models.
- The researchers develop a new type of adversarial attack, called an "algebraic adversarial attack," that can reliably fool integrated gradients and produce misleading explanations.
- They demonstrate the effectiveness of their attack on several benchmark datasets and models, showing that it can significantly degrade the quality of the explanations provided by integrated gradients.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are becoming increasingly powerful and are used to make important decisions in areas like healthcare, finance, and criminal justice. To build trust in these models, researchers have developed techniques like integrated gradients that try to explain how the models arrive at their predictions.
However, the new research shows that these explanation techniques can be "fooled" by adversarial attacks - small, carefully crafted changes to the input data that cause the model to make incorrect predictions, while still looking normal to a human. The researchers developed a new type of adversarial attack that can reliably produce misleading explanations from integrated gradients, even for models that were previously thought to be robust.
This is concerning because it means that the explanations provided by these techniques may not be trustworthy, and could even be actively misleading. It suggests that we need to be cautious about relying too heavily on these explanation methods, and that more research is needed to develop robust and reliable ways of explaining AI decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new type of adversarial attack called an "algebraic adversarial attack" that targets the integrated gradients technique for explaining the predictions of machine learning models.
Integrated gradients work by tracking the gradient of the model's output with respect to the input features, and then integrating these gradients along a path from a baseline input to the actual input. This produces an attribution score for each input feature, indicating how much it contributed to the model's prediction.
The researchers show that by carefully constructing an adversarial perturbation using an algebraic formulation, they can reliably fool integrated gradients into producing misleading explanations. Their attack works by finding a perturbation that changes the model's prediction while leaving the integrated gradients relatively unchanged.
They evaluate their attack on several benchmark datasets and models, including image classification and text classification tasks. The results demonstrate that their algebraic adversarial attack can significantly degrade the quality of the explanations provided by integrated gradients, even for models that were previously thought to be robust to adversarial attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of the vulnerability of integrated gradients to adversarial attacks, which is an important finding for the field of explainable AI. The researchers' algebraic formulation of the attack is technically sophisticated and their experimental results are thorough and convincing.
However, the paper does not address some important limitations and potential concerns with their approach. For example, the attack relies on knowledge of the target model's architecture and parameters, which may not always be available in real-world settings. Additionally, the paper does not explore the broader implications of their findings for the reliability and trustworthiness of AI-driven decision-making.
It would also be valuable to see the researchers investigate potential defenses or mitigation strategies that could make integrated gradients more robust to this type of attack. This could involve developing new explanation techniques that are inherently more resistant to adversarial perturbations, or designing better detection mechanisms to identify when explanations may be unreliable.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the literature on the security and robustness of explainable AI systems, but it also highlights the need for further research in this area to ensure the trustworthiness of AI-driven decision-making.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that the popular integrated gradients technique for explaining machine learning model predictions can be reliably fooled by a new type of adversarial attack. The researchers' "algebraic adversarial attack" can produce misleading explanations, even for models that were previously thought to be robust.
This finding is concerning because it suggests that the explanations provided by integrated gradients may not be as reliable or trustworthy as previously believed. It underscores the need for further research into developing robust and secure techniques for explaining AI decision-making, to ensure that these systems can be trusted to make important decisions in domains like healthcare, finance, and criminal justice.
By highlighting this vulnerability, the paper contributes to the growing body of work on the security and robustness of explainable AI systems, and it raises important questions about how we can ensure the trustworthiness of AI-driven decision-making in high-stakes applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
0
Algebraic Adversarial Attacks on Integrated Gradients
Lachlan Simpson, Federico Costanza, Kyle Millar, Adriel Cheng, Cheng-Chew Lim, Hong Gunn Chew
Adversarial attacks on explainability models have drastic consequences when explanations are used to understand the reasoning of neural networks in safety critical systems. Path methods are one such class of attribution methods susceptible to adversarial attacks. Adversarial learning is typically phrased as a constrained optimisation problem. In this work, we propose algebraic adversarial examples and study the conditions under which one can generate adversarial examples for integrated gradients. Algebraic adversarial examples provide a mathematically tractable approach to adversarial examples.
Read more7/24/2024
0
Improved Generation of Adversarial Examples Against Safety-aligned LLMs
Qizhang Li, Yiwen Guo, Wangmeng Zuo, Hao Chen
Despite numerous efforts to ensure large language models (LLMs) adhere to safety standards and produce harmless content, some successes have been achieved in bypassing these restrictions, known as jailbreak attacks against LLMs. Adversarial prompts generated using gradient-based methods exhibit outstanding performance in performing jailbreak attacks automatically. Nevertheless, due to the discrete nature of texts, the input gradient of LLMs struggles to precisely reflect the magnitude of loss change that results from token replacements in the prompt, leading to limited attack success rates against safety-aligned LLMs, even in the white-box setting. In this paper, we explore a new perspective on this problem, suggesting that it can be alleviated by leveraging innovations inspired in transfer-based attacks that were originally proposed for attacking black-box image classification models. For the first time, we appropriate the ideologies of effective methods among these transfer-based attacks, i.e., Skip Gradient Method and Intermediate Level Attack, for improving the effectiveness of automatically generated adversarial examples against white-box LLMs. With appropriate adaptations, we inject these ideologies into gradient-based adversarial prompt generation processes and achieve significant performance gains without introducing obvious computational cost. Meanwhile, by discussing mechanisms behind the gains, new insights are drawn, and proper combinations of these methods are also developed. Our empirical results show that the developed combination achieves >30% absolute increase in attack success rates compared with GCG for attacking the Llama-2-7B-Chat model on AdvBench.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks
Tao Wu, Canyixing Cui, Xingping Xian, Shaojie Qiao, Chao Wang, Lin Yuan, Shui Yu
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved tremendous success, but recent studies have shown that GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which significantly hinders their use in safety-critical scenarios. Therefore, the design of robust GNNs has attracted increasing attention. However, existing research has mainly been conducted via experimental trial and error, and thus far, there remains a lack of a comprehensive understanding of the vulnerability of GNNs. To address this limitation, we systematically investigate the adversarial robustness of GNNs by considering graph data patterns, model-specific factors, and the transferability of adversarial examples. Through extensive experiments, a set of principled guidelines is obtained for improving the adversarial robustness of GNNs, for example: (i) rather than highly regular graphs, the training graph data with diverse structural patterns is crucial for model robustness, which is consistent with the concept of adversarial training; (ii) the large model capacity of GNNs with sufficient training data has a positive effect on model robustness, and only a small percentage of neurons in GNNs are affected by adversarial attacks; (iii) adversarial transfer is not symmetric and the adversarial examples produced by the small-capacity model have stronger adversarial transferability. This work illuminates the vulnerabilities of GNNs and opens many promising avenues for designing robust GNNs.
Read more6/21/2024
🌐
0
On Gradient-like Explanation under a Black-box Setting: When Black-box Explanations Become as Good as White-box
Yi Cai, Gerhard Wunder
Attribution methods shed light on the explainability of data-driven approaches such as deep learning models by uncovering the most influential features in a to-be-explained decision. While determining feature attributions via gradients delivers promising results, the internal access required for acquiring gradients can be impractical under safety concerns, thus limiting the applicability of gradient-based approaches. In response to such limited flexibility, this paper presents methodAbr~(gradient-estimation-based explanation), an approach that produces gradient-like explanations through only query-level access. The proposed approach holds a set of fundamental properties for attribution methods, which are mathematically rigorously proved, ensuring the quality of its explanations. In addition to the theoretical analysis, with a focus on image data, the experimental results empirically demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over state-of-the-art black-box methods and its competitive performance compared to methods with full access.
Read more5/15/2024