On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularization
2405.16455
0
0
Abstract
Accurately aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is crucial for informing fair, economically sound, and statistically efficient decision-making processes. However, we argue that reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) -- the predominant approach for aligning LLMs with human preferences through a reward model -- suffers from an inherent algorithmic bias due to its Kullback--Leibler-based regularization in optimization. In extreme cases, this bias could lead to a phenomenon we term preference collapse, where minority preferences are virtually disregarded. To mitigate this algorithmic bias, we introduce preference matching (PM) RLHF, a novel approach that provably aligns LLMs with the preference distribution of the reward model under the Bradley--Terry--Luce/Plackett--Luce model. Central to our approach is a PM regularizer that takes the form of the negative logarithm of the LLM's policy probability distribution over responses, which helps the LLM balance response diversification and reward maximization. Notably, we obtain this regularizer by solving an ordinary differential equation that is necessary for the PM property. For practical implementation, we introduce a conditional variant of PM RLHF that is tailored to natural language generation. Finally, we empirically validate the effectiveness of conditional PM RLHF through experiments on the OPT-1.3B and Llama-2-7B models, demonstrating a 29% to 41% improvement in alignment with human preferences, as measured by a certain metric, compared to standard RLHF.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the algorithmic bias that can arise when aligning large language models with human preferences using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
- The authors identify two key issues: "preference collapse" and "matching regularization," which can lead to suboptimal model alignment.
- They propose solutions to address these challenges and conduct experiments to evaluate their approach.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are powerful tools, but they don't always behave the way we want them to. Researchers have been trying to "align" these models with human preferences, using a technique called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
The idea behind RLHF is to train the model to generate text that humans prefer, by rewarding it for producing outputs that align with human judgments. However, this process can sometimes go wrong, leading to two key problems:
-
Preference Collapse: The model may converge to a narrow set of "safe" responses that please the human raters, rather than exploring a wider range of potentially more valuable outputs.
-
Matching Regularization: The model may simply learn to mimic the training data, rather than developing a deeper understanding of human preferences.
The authors of this paper propose solutions to address these challenges, including new regularization techniques and modifications to the RLHF training process. They conduct experiments to evaluate their approach and demonstrate its effectiveness in improving the alignment of large language models with human preferences.
Technical Explanation
The paper first identifies two key issues that can arise when using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to align large language models with human preferences:
-
Preference Collapse: The authors show that RLHF can lead to a "preference collapse," where the model converges to a narrow set of "safe" responses that please human raters, rather than exploring a wider range of potentially more valuable outputs. This can result in the model failing to capture the full breadth of human preferences.
-
Matching Regularization: The authors also discuss the problem of "matching regularization," where the model simply learns to mimic the training data, rather than developing a deeper understanding of human preferences. This can lead to suboptimal model alignment.
To address these challenges, the authors propose several solutions, including:
- Preference Shaping: The introduction of a "preference shaping" term in the RLHF objective, which encourages the model to explore a wider range of outputs.
- Matching Regularization: The use of a "matching regularization" term to prevent the model from simply mimicking the training data.
- Iterative Preference Learning: An iterative process of preference learning, where the model's understanding of human preferences is gradually refined over multiple rounds of feedback and refinement.
The authors conduct a series of experiments to evaluate their proposed solutions, using both synthetic and real-world datasets. They demonstrate that their approach can effectively mitigate the issues of preference collapse and matching regularization, leading to improved alignment of large language models with human preferences.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful analysis of the challenges involved in aligning large language models with human preferences using RLHF, and the authors' proposed solutions appear promising. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:
-
Generalization to Real-World Scenarios: While the experiments in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of the authors' approach in controlled settings, it's unclear how well it would generalize to more complex, real-world applications of large language models, where the scope and diversity of human preferences may be much broader.
-
Scalability and Computational Complexity: The iterative preference learning approach proposed by the authors may be computationally intensive, especially for large-scale language models. Further research is needed to assess the scalability and practical feasibility of this approach.
-
Ethical Considerations: As large language models become more powerful and influential, it's crucial to consider the ethical implications of aligning them with human preferences. The authors touch on this briefly, but more in-depth discussion of potential biases, privacy concerns, and other ethical considerations would be valuable.
-
Comparison to Alternative Approaches: While the paper references related work, a more detailed comparison of the authors' approach to other methods for aligning language models with human preferences (e.g., More RLHF, More Trust: The Impact of Human Preference on Language Model Alignment, Linear Alignment: A Closed-Form Solution for Aligning Language Models to Human Preferences, Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning, Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging the Gap) would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the state of the art in this field.
Conclusion
This paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to align large language models with human preferences, addressing key challenges like preference collapse and matching regularization. The authors' proposed solutions, including preference shaping and iterative preference learning, demonstrate promising results in improving model alignment.
As the development of powerful language models continues, it will be crucial to address these types of algorithmic biases and ensure that these systems are aligned with human values and preferences in a meaningful and ethical way. The insights and techniques presented in this paper represent an important step forward in this direction, but further research and real-world testing will be needed to fully realize the potential of these approaches.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Aligning language models with human preferences
Tomasz Korbak
0
0
Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.
4/19/2024
More RLHF, More Trust? On The Impact of Human Preference Alignment On Language Model Trustworthiness
Aaron J. Li, Satyapriya Krishna, Himabindu Lakkaraju
0
0
The surge in Large Language Models (LLMs) development has led to improved performance on cognitive tasks as well as an urgent need to align these models with human values in order to safely exploit their power. Despite the effectiveness of preference learning algorithms like Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback (RLHF) in aligning human preferences, their assumed improvements on model trustworthiness haven't been thoroughly testified. Toward this end, this study investigates how models that have been aligned with general-purpose preference data on helpfulness and harmlessness perform across five trustworthiness verticals: toxicity, stereotypical bias, machine ethics, truthfulness, and privacy. For model alignment, we focus on three widely used RLHF variants: Supervised Finetuning (SFT), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Through extensive empirical investigations, we discover that the improvement in trustworthiness by RLHF is far from guaranteed, and there exists a complex interplay between preference data, alignment algorithms, and specific trustworthiness aspects. Together, our results underscore the need for more nuanced approaches for model alignment. By shedding light on the intricate dynamics of these components within model alignment, we hope this research will guide the community towards developing language models that are both capable and trustworthy.
4/30/2024
Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback
Songyang Gao, Qiming Ge, Wei Shen, Shihan Dou, Junjie Ye, Xiao Wang, Rui Zheng, Yicheng Zou, Zhi Chen, Hang Yan, Qi Zhang, Dahua Lin
0
0
The success of AI assistants based on Language Models (LLMs) hinges on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to comprehend and align with user intentions. However, traditional alignment algorithms, such as PPO, are hampered by complex annotation and training requirements. This reliance limits the applicability of RLHF and hinders the development of professional assistants tailored to diverse human preferences. In this work, we introduce textit{Linear Alignment}, a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step, eliminating the reliance on data annotation and model training. Linear alignment incorporates a new parameterization for policy optimization under divergence constraints, which enables the extraction of optimal policy in a closed-form manner and facilitates the direct estimation of the aligned response. Extensive experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment across diverse scenarios. Our code and dataset is published on url{https://github.com/Wizardcoast/Linear_Alignment.git}.
5/7/2024
💬
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
0
0
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
5/6/2024