Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning

2310.16960

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/6/2024 by Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim

💬

Abstract

Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of differential privacy (DP) to enable privacy-preserving alignment of large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL).
  • The researchers study two main approaches: (i) alignment via RL without human involvement, and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF).
  • The paper proposes a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL and validates its effectiveness through experiments.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the challenge of aligning large language models with human preferences. This is an important step between pre-training and deploying these models for real-world use, ensuring they behave in a way that is desirable and beneficial to humans.

The researchers explore using reinforcement learning (RL) as a way to align the language models. RL involves training the model by rewarding it for taking actions that align with the desired behavior.

However, the researchers are also concerned about protecting the privacy of the data used in this training process. They propose using differential privacy (DP), a technique that adds noise to the data to prevent individual information from being identified.

The paper explores two main approaches to RL-based alignment:

  1. Alignment without human involvement, such as generating positive reviews.
  2. Alignment based on feedback from humans, known as RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback).

The researchers develop a new DP framework to enable privacy-preserving alignment via RL and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences using reinforcement learning (RL) while preserving privacy through the use of differential privacy (DP).

The researchers study two main paradigms for RL-based alignment:

  1. Alignment via RL without human in the loop: In this approach, the model is trained to generate outputs that are deemed desirable, such as positive product reviews, without direct human feedback.
  2. Alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF): Here, the model is trained based on feedback provided by humans, for example, to summarize text in a way that matches human preferences.

To achieve privacy-preserving alignment, the researchers develop a new DP framework that can be applied to both of these RL-based alignment approaches. The key idea is to add noise to the training data and gradients used in the RL process, ensuring that individual information cannot be easily identified.

The paper provides a formal analysis to prove the correctness of the proposed DP framework for RL-based alignment. Additionally, the researchers conduct experiments to validate the effectiveness of their approach, demonstrating that the models can achieve competitive utility while providing strong privacy guarantees.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and important contribution by addressing the challenge of aligning large language models with human preferences in a privacy-preserving manner. The proposed DP framework for RL-based alignment is a valuable step forward in this domain.

However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations and challenges of this approach. For example, the researchers do not discuss the implications of the added noise on the model's performance or the trade-offs between privacy and utility. Additionally, the paper does not explore the long-term stability and robustness of the RL-based alignment process, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployment.

Further research is needed to better understand the learning dynamics of alignment with human feedback and the potential pitfalls or unintended consequences that may arise. Exploring the practical implementation of RLHF in a privacy-preserving manner would also be a valuable area of investigation.

Overall, the paper presents a promising step forward, but there are still many open questions and challenges that need to be addressed to ensure the safe and effective alignment of large language models with human preferences while preserving individual privacy.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of differential privacy (DP) to enable privacy-preserving alignment of large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL). The researchers study two main approaches: alignment via RL without human involvement and alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF).

The paper proposes a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL and validates its effectiveness through experiments. This work represents an important advancement in the field of aligning large language models with human preferences while preserving individual privacy.

However, the paper also raises important questions about the long-term stability and robustness of RL-based alignment, as well as the trade-offs between privacy and utility. Further research is needed to address these challenges and ensure the safe and effective deployment of aligned language models in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision

Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision

Dehong Xu, Liang Qiu, Minseok Kim, Faisal Ladhak, Jaeyoung Do

YC

0

Reddit

0

Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations. Current approaches focus on using reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve model alignment, which works by transforming coarse human preferences of LLM outputs into a feedback signal that guides the model learning process. However, because this approach operates on sequence-level feedback, it lacks the precision to identify the exact parts of the output affecting user preferences. To address this gap, we propose a method to enhance LLM alignment through fine-grained token-level supervision. Specifically, we ask annotators to minimally edit less preferred responses within the standard reward modeling dataset to make them more favorable, ensuring changes are made only where necessary while retaining most of the original content. The refined dataset is used to train a token-level reward model, which is then used for training our fine-grained Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) model. Our experiment results demonstrate that this approach can achieve up to an absolute improvement of $5.1%$ in LLM performance, in terms of win rate against the reference model, compared with the traditional PPO model.

Read more

6/6/2024

💬

Aligning language models with human preferences

Tomasz Korbak

YC

0

Reddit

0

Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.

Read more

4/19/2024

💬

The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors

Guanying Jiang, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.

Read more

5/2/2024

Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback

Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback

Songyang Gao, Qiming Ge, Wei Shen, Shihan Dou, Junjie Ye, Xiao Wang, Rui Zheng, Yicheng Zou, Zhi Chen, Hang Yan, Qi Zhang, Dahua Lin

YC

0

Reddit

0

The success of AI assistants based on Language Models (LLMs) hinges on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to comprehend and align with user intentions. However, traditional alignment algorithms, such as PPO, are hampered by complex annotation and training requirements. This reliance limits the applicability of RLHF and hinders the development of professional assistants tailored to diverse human preferences. In this work, we introduce textit{Linear Alignment}, a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step, eliminating the reliance on data annotation and model training. Linear alignment incorporates a new parameterization for policy optimization under divergence constraints, which enables the extraction of optimal policy in a closed-form manner and facilitates the direct estimation of the aligned response. Extensive experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment across diverse scenarios. Our code and dataset is published on url{https://github.com/Wizardcoast/Linear_Alignment.git}.

Read more

5/7/2024