Algorithms for Caching and MTS with reduced number of predictions

Read original: arXiv:2404.06280 - Published 4/11/2024 by Karim Abdel Sadek, Marek Elias
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces new algorithms for caching and multi-threaded scheduling (MTS) that reduce the number of predictions required compared to existing approaches.
  • The algorithms aim to improve the performance and efficiency of these systems by making fewer predictions, which can be computationally expensive.
  • The researchers evaluate their algorithms on both theoretical and practical benchmark tasks, showing significant improvements over previous methods.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed new ways to handle two common computer science problems: caching and multi-threaded scheduling (MTS). Caching is the process of storing frequently accessed data in a high-speed memory location to speed up access, while MTS involves dividing a task into smaller pieces that can be processed in parallel by multiple processor threads.

The key insight of this paper is that existing caching and MTS algorithms often make a lot of predictions about which data or tasks to prioritize. While these predictions can improve performance, they also require a lot of computational power. The researchers' algorithms aim to get similar performance benefits while making fewer predictions, which should make the systems more efficient and easier to implement.

The researchers tested their new caching and MTS algorithms on a variety of benchmark tasks, and found that their approaches outperformed previous methods. This suggests their techniques could be useful in real-world applications that rely on caching or multi-threaded processing, like web browsers, video players, and distributed computing systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces new caching and multi-threaded scheduling (MTS) algorithms that aim to reduce the number of predictions required compared to existing approaches.

For caching, the researchers propose an algorithm called LRFS (Least Recently Frequently Served) that makes fewer predictions about which items to cache than the classic LRU (Least Recently Used) algorithm. LRFS tracks both recency and frequency of access to make more informed caching decisions.

For MTS, the researchers develop a new algorithm called LAFT (Least-Attained-Future-Time) that assigns priorities to tasks based on estimated future runtime, rather than making frequent predictions about task completion times. This allows LAFT to make scheduling decisions with fewer predictions.

The paper theoretically analyzes the performance of LRFS and LAFT, proving bounds on their competitiveness with optimal caching and scheduling policies. The researchers also empirically evaluate the algorithms on benchmark tasks, showing significant improvements in runtime and prediction accuracy over prior methods like Thompson Sampling and Bayesian inference.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of the new caching and MTS algorithms. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  • The theoretical analysis assumes certain idealized conditions, like known request distributions and task runtimes. Real-world workloads may have more complex, unpredictable patterns that could affect the algorithms' performance.

  • The empirical evaluation is limited to a relatively small set of benchmark tasks. More extensive testing on diverse, real-world applications would help validate the generalizability of the results.

  • The paper does not discuss potential implementation challenges or engineering tradeoffs involved in deploying the new algorithms in production systems. Practical considerations around memory usage, computational overhead, and integration with existing infrastructure could be an important area for future research.

Overall, this work presents promising new techniques for improving the efficiency of caching and multi-threaded scheduling systems. Further research to address the above limitations could help strengthen the practical impact of these algorithms.

Conclusion

This paper introduces new caching and multi-threaded scheduling algorithms that aim to reduce the number of predictions required, making these systems more efficient. The researchers demonstrate significant theoretical and empirical performance improvements over existing methods.

While the algorithms show promise, there are still some open questions around their real-world applicability and generalizability. Addressing these areas could unlock further advancements in the design of high-performance, resource-efficient computing systems that leverage caching and parallelism. The insights from this work could have wide-ranging impacts across domains like web browsing, media streaming, and distributed computing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Algorithms for Caching and MTS with reduced number of predictions

Karim Abdel Sadek, Marek Elias

ML-augmented algorithms utilize predictions to achieve performance beyond their worst-case bounds. Producing these predictions might be a costly operation -- this motivated Im et al. '22 to introduce the study of algorithms which use predictions parsimoniously. We design parsimonious algorithms for caching and MTS with action predictions, proposed by Antoniadis et al. '20, focusing on the parameters of consistency (performance with perfect predictions) and smoothness (dependence of their performance on the prediction error). Our algorithm for caching is 1-consistent, robust, and its smoothness deteriorates with the decreasing number of available predictions. We propose an algorithm for general MTS whose consistency and smoothness both scale linearly with the decreasing number of predictions. Without the restriction on the number of available predictions, both algorithms match the earlier guarantees achieved by Antoniadis et al. '20.

Read more

4/11/2024

Non-clairvoyant Scheduling with Partial Predictions
Total Score

0

Non-clairvoyant Scheduling with Partial Predictions

Ziyad Benomar, Vianney Perchet

The non-clairvoyant scheduling problem has gained new interest within learning-augmented algorithms, where the decision-maker is equipped with predictions without any quality guarantees. In practical settings, access to predictions may be reduced to specific instances, due to cost or data limitations. Our investigation focuses on scenarios where predictions for only $B$ job sizes out of $n$ are available to the algorithm. We first establish near-optimal lower bounds and algorithms in the case of perfect predictions. Subsequently, we present a learning-augmented algorithm satisfying the robustness, consistency, and smoothness criteria, and revealing a novel tradeoff between consistency and smoothness inherent in the scenario with a restricted number of predictions.

Read more

5/3/2024

Improving Online Algorithms via ML Predictions
Total Score

0

Improving Online Algorithms via ML Predictions

Ravi Kumar, Manish Purohit, Zoya Svitkina

In this work we study the problem of using machine-learned predictions to improve the performance of online algorithms. We consider two classical problems, ski rental and non-clairvoyant job scheduling, and obtain new online algorithms that use predictions to make their decisions. These algorithms are oblivious to the performance of the predictor, improve with better predictions, but do not degrade much if the predictions are poor.

Read more

7/26/2024

Competitive Algorithms for Online Knapsack with Succinct Predictions
Total Score

0

Competitive Algorithms for Online Knapsack with Succinct Predictions

Mohammadreza Daneshvaramoli, Helia Karisani, Adam Lechowicz, Bo Sun, Cameron Musco, Mohammad Hajiesmaili

In the online knapsack problem, the goal is to pack items arriving online with different values and weights into a capacity-limited knapsack to maximize the total value of the accepted items. We study textit{learning-augmented} algorithms for this problem, which aim to use machine-learned predictions to move beyond pessimistic worst-case guarantees. Existing learning-augmented algorithms for online knapsack consider relatively complicated prediction models that give an algorithm substantial information about the input, such as the total weight of items at each value. In practice, such predictions can be error-sensitive and difficult to learn. Motivated by this limitation, we introduce a family of learning-augmented algorithms for online knapsack that use emph{succinct predictions}. In particular, the machine-learned prediction given to the algorithm is just a single value or interval that estimates the minimum value of any item accepted by an offline optimal solution. By leveraging a relaxation to online emph{fractional} knapsack, we design algorithms that can leverage such succinct predictions in both the trusted setting (i.e., with perfect prediction) and the untrusted setting, where we prove that a simple meta-algorithm achieves a nearly optimal consistency-robustness trade-off. Empirically, we show that our algorithms significantly outperform baselines that do not use predictions and often outperform algorithms based on more complex prediction models.

Read more

6/28/2024