Aligners: Decoupling LLMs and Alignment
2403.04224
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be aligned with human expectations to ensure their safety and utility in most applications. Alignment is challenging, costly, and needs to be repeated for every LLM and alignment criterion. We propose to decouple LLMs and alignment by training aligner models that can be used to align any LLM for a given criteria on an as-needed basis, thus also reducing the potential negative impacts of alignment on performance. Our recipe for training the aligner models solely relies on synthetic data generated with a (prompted) LLM and can be easily adjusted for a variety of alignment criteria. We use the same synthetic data to train inspectors, binary miss-alignment classification models to guide a squad of multiple aligners. Our empirical results demonstrate consistent improvements when applying aligner squad to various LLMs, including chat-aligned models, across several instruction-following and red-teaming datasets.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces the concept of "Aligners" - a way to decouple large language models (LLMs) from the alignment process, allowing for more efficient and robust adaptation.
- The paper presents two main approaches: "Aligners" which learn to correct the outputs of LLMs, and "Inspectors" which assess the alignment of LLMs.
- Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques for improving the alignment of LLMs while maintaining their capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a new way to work with large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can sometimes produce outputs that are not well-aligned with the intended goals or values.
The key idea is to "decouple" the LLM from the alignment process. Instead of trying to train the LLM itself to be perfectly aligned, the researchers introduce "Aligners" - separate models that can learn to correct the outputs of the LLM. The Aligners are trained to identify when the LLM's output is misaligned and make the necessary adjustments.
Additionally, the paper introduces "Inspectors" - models that can evaluate the alignment of the LLM without having to retrain it. This allows for more efficient and robust adaptation of LLMs to different tasks and environments.
The experiments show that these Aligners and Inspectors can significantly improve the alignment of LLMs while preserving their impressive language generation capabilities. This could be useful for a wide range of applications, from chatbots to content generation, where it's important to ensure the AI system's outputs are well-aligned with the desired goals.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the concept of "Aligners" - models that can learn to correct the outputs of large language models (LLMs) to improve their alignment with desired objectives. This is in contrast to Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct and Decoupled Alignment: Robust, Plug-and-Play Adaptation, which focus on directly aligning the LLM itself.
The researchers also present "Inspectors" - models that can assess the alignment of LLMs without having to retrain them. This allows for more scalable and efficient adaptation of LLMs, as described in Towards Scalable Automated Alignment of LLMs: A Survey.
In the experiments, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Aligners and Inspectors on language models like GPT-3. They show that these techniques can improve alignment while maintaining the impressive language generation capabilities of the LLMs. This builds on work like CodeCLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data and Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-Grained adaptation.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the Aligner and Inspector approaches, but there are a few potential limitations to consider:
- The reliance on separate models (Aligners and Inspectors) adds complexity to the system, which could impact deployment and scalability in some scenarios.
- The paper does not provide a deep analysis of the tradeoffs between the Aligner and Inspector approaches, or when one might be preferred over the other.
- The experiments are focused on language generation tasks, but the application of these techniques to other domains (e.g., decision-making, reasoning) is not explored.
Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for improving the alignment of large language models, but further research is needed to fully understand the implications and limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel way to decouple large language models from the alignment process, using Aligners and Inspectors. The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques for improving the alignment of LLMs while preserving their impressive language generation capabilities.
The Aligner and Inspector approaches offer a potentially more efficient and scalable path to aligning LLMs compared to direct retraining or fine-tuning. This could have significant implications for a wide range of AI applications that rely on large language models, from chatbots to content generation, where ensuring alignment with desired goals and values is crucial.
The paper lays the groundwork for further research on these decoupled alignment techniques, exploring their application to other domains and addressing the potential limitations identified in the critical analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct
Jiaming Ji, Boyuan Chen, Hantao Lou, Donghai Hong, Borong Zhang, Xuehai Pan, Juntao Dai, Tianyi Qiu, Yaodong Yang
0
0
With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and ever-evolving practical requirements, finding an efficient and effective alignment method has never been more critical. However, the tension between the complexity of current alignment methods and the need for rapid iteration in deployment scenarios necessitates the development of a model-agnostic alignment approach that can operate under these constraints. In this paper, we introduce Aligner, a novel and simple alignment paradigm that learns the correctional residuals between preferred and dispreferred answers using a small model. Designed as a model-agnostic, plug-and-play module, Aligner can be directly applied to various open-source and API-based models with only one-off training, making it suitable for rapid iteration. Notably, Aligner can be applied to any powerful, large-scale upstream models. Moreover, it can even iteratively bootstrap the upstream models using corrected responses as synthetic human preference data, breaking through the model's performance ceiling. Our experiments demonstrate performance improvements by deploying the same Aligner model across 11 different LLMs, evaluated on the 3H dimensions (helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty). Specifically, Aligner-7B has achieved an average improvement of 68.9% in helpfulness and 23.8% in harmlessness across the tested LLMs while also effectively reducing hallucination. In the Alpaca-Eval leaderboard, stacking Aligner-2B on GPT-4 Turbo improved its LC Win Rate from 55.0% to 58.3%, surpassing GPT-4 Omni's 57.5% Win Rate (community report).
6/4/2024
Decoupled Alignment for Robust Plug-and-Play Adaptation
Haozheng Luo, Jiahao Yu, Wenxin Zhang, Jialong Li, Jerry Yao-Chieh Hu, Xinyu Xing, Han Liu
0
0
We introduce a low-resource safety enhancement method for aligning large language models (LLMs) without the need for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Our main idea is to exploit knowledge distillation to extract the alignment information from existing well-aligned LLMs and integrate it into unaligned LLMs in a plug-and-play fashion. Methodology, we employ delta debugging to identify the critical components of knowledge necessary for effective distillation. On the harmful question dataset, our method significantly enhances the average defense success rate by approximately 14.41%, reaching as high as 51.39%, in 17 unaligned pre-trained LLMs, without compromising performance.
6/7/2024
Towards Scalable Automated Alignment of LLMs: A Survey
Boxi Cao, Keming Lu, Xinyu Lu, Jiawei Chen, Mengjie Ren, Hao Xiang, Peilin Liu, Yaojie Lu, Ben He, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Hongyu Lin, Bowen Yu
0
0
Alignment is the most critical step in building large language models (LLMs) that meet human needs. With the rapid development of LLMs gradually surpassing human capabilities, traditional alignment methods based on human-annotation are increasingly unable to meet the scalability demands. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore new sources of automated alignment signals and technical approaches. In this paper, we systematically review the recently emerging methods of automated alignment, attempting to explore how to achieve effective, scalable, automated alignment once the capabilities of LLMs exceed those of humans. Specifically, we categorize existing automated alignment methods into 4 major categories based on the sources of alignment signals and discuss the current status and potential development of each category. Additionally, we explore the underlying mechanisms that enable automated alignment and discuss the essential factors that make automated alignment technologies feasible and effective from the fundamental role of alignment.
6/4/2024
Model Merging and Safety Alignment: One Bad Model Spoils the Bunch
Hasan Abed Al Kader Hammoud, Umberto Michieli, Fabio Pizzati, Philip Torr, Adel Bibi, Bernard Ghanem, Mete Ozay
0
0
Merging Large Language Models (LLMs) is a cost-effective technique for combining multiple expert LLMs into a single versatile model, retaining the expertise of the original ones. However, current approaches often overlook the importance of safety alignment during merging, leading to highly misaligned models. This work investigates the effects of model merging on alignment. We evaluate several popular model merging techniques, demonstrating that existing methods do not only transfer domain expertise but also propagate misalignment. We propose a simple two-step approach to address this problem: (i) generating synthetic safety and domain-specific data, and (ii) incorporating these generated data into the optimization process of existing data-aware model merging techniques. This allows us to treat alignment as a skill that can be maximized in the resulting merged LLM. Our experiments illustrate the effectiveness of integrating alignment-related data during merging, resulting in models that excel in both domain expertise and alignment.
6/21/2024