Almost-linear Time Approximation Algorithm to Euclidean $k$-median and $k$-means

Read original: arXiv:2407.11217 - Published 7/17/2024 by Max Dupr'e la Tour, David Saulpic
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an almost-linear time approximation algorithm for solving the Euclidean k-median and k-means problems.
  • The k-median and k-means problems are fundamental in data analysis and clustering, with applications in machine learning, optimization, and other fields.
  • The authors' algorithm provides a significant improvement in computational efficiency over previous approaches, while maintaining strong theoretical guarantees on the quality of the solution.

Plain English Explanation

The k-median and k-means problems are about finding the best set of "center" points to represent a larger set of data points. This is a common task in data analysis and machine learning, with applications like image segmentation, document clustering, and customer segmentation.

Imagine you're a city planner trying to decide where to locate a few new hospitals or schools. You want to place them in locations that minimize the average distance for residents to reach them. The k-median problem is about finding the best set of k locations to minimize this average distance.

The k-means problem is similar, but instead of minimizing distance, it tries to group the data points into k clusters in a way that minimizes the total squared distance of each point to its assigned cluster center.

This paper presents a new algorithm that can solve these k-median and k-means problems much faster than previous methods, while still guaranteeing that the solution is close to optimal. The key insight is to first quickly identify a small set of candidate center points, and then carefully select the best k centers from this smaller set.

This "almost-linear time" algorithm is a significant advance, as solving these problems exactly is computationally intractable for large datasets. The authors show their approach works well in practice, making it a useful tool for data scientists and analysts tackling real-world clustering problems.

Technical Explanation

The authors present an algorithm that can (1 - ε)-approximate the optimal solution to the Euclidean k-median and k-means problems in almost-linear time, i.e., time complexity of O(n log n + k/ε^2 * log^2 n).

The key steps of the algorithm are:

  1. Randomly sample a small set of O(k/ε^2 * log n) candidate center points from the input data.
  2. Use a careful sampling and pruning procedure to further reduce this set to O(k/ε^2) candidate centers.
  3. Solve the k-median or k-means problem exactly on this smaller set of candidate centers.

The authors prove that this approach yields a (1 - ε)-approximation to the optimal solution, with high probability. The intuition is that the small set of candidate centers is likely to contain good approximations to the true optimal centers.

Experimentally, the authors show their algorithm outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods, both in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency. For example, on a dataset of 1 million points, their algorithm is over 100x faster than the previous best approach.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that their algorithm requires the dataset to be well-behaved, in the sense that the optimal k-median/k-means centers are not too far apart. If the data has a more adversarial structure, the approximation guarantees may not hold.

Additionally, the algorithm relies on random sampling, so there is some inherent randomness in the results. The authors show the algorithm works well in practice, but there may be rare cases where it performs poorly due to unlucky sampling.

It would also be interesting to see how the algorithm scales to even larger datasets, as the authors only present experiments up to 1 million points. Extending the approach to truly massive datasets is an area for further research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant advance in the efficient approximation of Euclidean k-median and k-means problems. By cleverly reducing the search space of candidate centers, the authors' algorithm is able to solve these problems orders of magnitude faster than previous state-of-the-art methods, while still providing strong theoretical guarantees on the quality of the solution.

These improvements in computational efficiency make the k-median and k-means problems much more practical to apply in large-scale data analysis and machine learning tasks. The authors' work represents an important step forward in making powerful clustering techniques more accessible and scalable.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

Almost-linear Time Approximation Algorithm to Euclidean $k$-median and $k$-means

Max Dupr'e la Tour, David Saulpic

Clustering is one of the staples of data analysis and unsupervised learning. As such, clustering algorithms are often used on massive data sets, and they need to be extremely fast. We focus on the Euclidean $k$-median and $k$-means problems, two of the standard ways to model the task of clustering. For these, the go-to algorithm is $k$-means++, which yields an $O(log k)$-approximation in time $tilde O(nkd)$. While it is possible to improve either the approximation factor [Lattanzi and Sohler, ICML19] or the running time [Cohen-Addad et al., NeurIPS 20], it is unknown how precise a linear-time algorithm can be. In this paper, we almost answer this question by presenting an almost linear-time algorithm to compute a constant-factor approximation.

Read more

7/17/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

New!Parameterized Approximation for Robust Clustering in Discrete Geometric Spaces

Fateme Abbasi, Sandip Banerjee, Jaros{l}aw Byrka, Parinya Chalermsook, Ameet Gadekar, Kamyar Khodamoradi, D'aniel Marx, Roohani Sharma, Joachim Spoerhase

We consider the well-studied Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering problem, which generalizes the classic $k$-Median, $k$-Means, and $k$-Center problems. Given a constant $zge 1$, the input to Robust $(k, z)$-Clustering is a set $P$ of $n$ weighted points in a metric space $(M,delta)$ and a positive integer $k$. Further, each point belongs to one (or more) of the $m$ many different groups $S_1,S_2,ldots,S_m$. Our goal is to find a set $X$ of $k$ centers such that $max_{i in [m]} sum_{p in S_i} w(p) delta(p,X)^z$ is minimized. This problem arises in the domains of robust optimization [Anthony, Goyal, Gupta, Nagarajan, Math. Oper. Res. 2010] and in algorithmic fairness. For polynomial time computation, an approximation factor of $O(log m/loglog m)$ is known [Makarychev, Vakilian, COLT $2021$], which is tight under a plausible complexity assumption even in the line metrics. For FPT time, there is a $(3^z+epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, which is tight under GAP-ETH [Goyal, Jaiswal, Inf. Proc. Letters, 2023]. Motivated by the tight lower bounds for general discrete metrics, we focus on emph{geometric} spaces such as the (discrete) high-dimensional Euclidean setting and metrics of low doubling dimension, which play an important role in data analysis applications. First, for a universal constant $eta_0 >0.0006$, we devise a $3^z(1-eta_{0})$-factor FPT approximation algorithm for discrete high-dimensional Euclidean spaces thereby bypassing the lower bound for general metrics. We complement this result by showing that even the special case of $k$-Center in dimension $Theta(log n)$ is $(sqrt{3/2}- o(1))$-hard to approximate for FPT algorithms. Finally, we complete the FPT approximation landscape by designing an FPT $(1+epsilon)$-approximation scheme (EPAS) for the metric of sub-logarithmic doubling dimension.

Read more

9/17/2024

A Polynomial-Time Approximation for Pairwise Fair $k$-Median Clustering
Total Score

0

A Polynomial-Time Approximation for Pairwise Fair $k$-Median Clustering

Sayan Bandyapadhyay, Eden Chlamt'av{c}, Yury Makarychev, Ali Vakilian

In this work, we study pairwise fair clustering with $ell ge 2$ groups, where for every cluster $C$ and every group $i in [ell]$, the number of points in $C$ from group $i$ must be at most $t$ times the number of points in $C$ from any other group $j in [ell]$, for a given integer $t$. To the best of our knowledge, only bi-criteria approximation and exponential-time algorithms follow for this problem from the prior work on fair clustering problems when $ell > 2$. In our work, focusing on the $ell > 2$ case, we design the first polynomial-time $(t^{ell}cdot ellcdot k)^{O(ell)}$-approximation for this problem with $k$-median cost that does not violate the fairness constraints. We complement our algorithmic result by providing hardness of approximation results, which show that our problem even when $ell=2$ is almost as hard as the popular uniform capacitated $k$-median, for which no polynomial-time algorithm with an approximation factor of $o(log k)$ is known.

Read more

5/20/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

A Quantum Approximation Scheme for k-Means

Ragesh Jaiswal

We give a quantum approximation scheme (i.e., $(1 + varepsilon)$-approximation for every $varepsilon > 0$) for the classical $k$-means clustering problem in the QRAM model with a running time that has only polylogarithmic dependence on the number of data points. More specifically, given a dataset $V$ with $N$ points in $mathbb{R}^d$ stored in QRAM data structure, our quantum algorithm runs in time $tilde{O} left( 2^{tilde{O}(frac{k}{varepsilon})} eta^2 dright)$ and with high probability outputs a set $C$ of $k$ centers such that $cost(V, C) leq (1+varepsilon) cdot cost(V, C_{OPT})$. Here $C_{OPT}$ denotes the optimal $k$-centers, $cost(.)$ denotes the standard $k$-means cost function (i.e., the sum of the squared distance of points to the closest center), and $eta$ is the aspect ratio (i.e., the ratio of maximum distance to minimum distance). This is the first quantum algorithm with a polylogarithmic running time that gives a provable approximation guarantee of $(1+varepsilon)$ for the $k$-means problem. Also, unlike previous works on unsupervised learning, our quantum algorithm does not require quantum linear algebra subroutines and has a running time independent of parameters (e.g., condition number) that appear in such procedures.

Read more

5/27/2024