AMERICANO: Argument Generation with Discourse-driven Decomposition and Agent Interaction

Overview

• The paper proposes a novel framework called Americano for argument generation in natural language processing.
• Americano decomposes the argument generation process into sequential actions based on argumentation theory.
• It introduces an argument refinement module to mimic the human writing process and improve upon current autoregressive language models.
• The framework is evaluated on the task of counterargument generation using a Reddit/CMV dataset.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the challenge of argument generation, which involves using natural language processing to automatically generate well-reasoned and organized arguments. The authors were inspired by recent advancements in chain-of-thought prompting, which breaks down complex tasks into intermediate steps.

Their proposed framework, called Americano, decomposes the argument generation process into a series of sequential actions grounded in argumentation theory. First, it generates the various components of an argument (e.g., claim, evidence, counterargument) one by one. Then, it produces a final argument by combining these components.

To better mimic the human writing process and improve upon the limitations of current autoregressive language models, the authors also introduce an argument refinement module. This module automatically evaluates and refines draft arguments based on feedback, allowing the system to iteratively improve the quality of the final output.

The framework is evaluated on the task of counterargument generation using a dataset from Reddit's Change My View (CMV) forum. The results show that Americano outperforms both end-to-end and chain-of-thought prompting methods, generating more coherent and persuasive arguments with diverse and rich content.

Technical Explanation

The Americano framework decomposes the argument generation process into a sequence of actions grounded in argumentation theory. These actions include generating the claim, evidence, counterargument, and rebuttal, which are then combined to produce the final argument.

To enable this sequential generation, the authors introduce an agent interaction mechanism, where each component is generated by a specialized agent. The agents communicate with each other to ensure the coherence and flow of the overall argument.

Furthermore, the authors include an argument refinement module that automatically evaluates and refines the argument drafts. This module provides feedback to the agents, allowing them to iteratively improve the quality of the generated arguments.

The framework is evaluated on the counterargument generation task using a subset of the Reddit/CMV dataset. The results show that Americano outperforms both end-to-end and chain-of-thought prompting methods, generating more coherent and persuasive arguments with diverse and rich content.

Critical Analysis

The authors' Americano framework presents a promising approach to argument generation, as it breaks down the complex task into more manageable steps and introduces an iterative refinement process. However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the limitations or potential issues with the framework.

One area that could be explored further is the robustness and generalizability of the Americano approach. The evaluation is conducted on a single dataset, and it would be valuable to see how the framework performs on a wider range of argument generation tasks and datasets.

Additionally, the interpretability and transparency of the agent interaction and argument refinement modules could be investigated more deeply. Understanding the decision-making process and the factors that influence the final argument generation would be beneficial for gaining trust and acceptance of the system.

Overall, the Americano framework represents an interesting and potentially impactful contribution to the field of argument generation, but further research is needed to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion

The Americano framework proposes a novel approach to argument generation that decomposes the task into sequential actions and introduces an argument refinement module to mimic the human writing process. The evaluation results show that this framework outperforms existing methods, generating more coherent and persuasive arguments.

While the paper demonstrates the potential of the Americano approach, further research is needed to explore its robustness, generalizability, and interpretability. Nonetheless, the framework represents an important step forward in the field of computational argumentation, with promising implications for applications that require the generation of well-reasoned and persuasive natural language arguments.