End-to-End Argument Mining as Augmented Natural Language Generation

Overview

• This paper presents an end-to-end approach for argument mining that uses a generative paradigm, where a language model is trained to generate argument components and classify argumentative relations.
• The model, called ARGument Marker (ARGMAR), aims to simultaneously identify argument components (e.g., claims, premises) and the relations between them (e.g., support, attack).
• This contrasts with traditional argument mining, which often treats these as separate tasks, requiring multiple models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new way to analyze argumentative text using a machine learning model. Typically, argument mining - the process of identifying the key parts of an argument and how they relate to each other - is done in two separate steps: first identifying the argument components (like claims and reasons), and then figuring out how those components are connected (like one claim supporting or attacking another).

However, the researchers in this paper have developed a single model that can do both of these tasks at once. Their model, called ARGMAR, is trained on argumentative text to simultaneously identify the different parts of the argument (the argument components) and understand how those parts relate to each other (the argumentative relations).

This "end-to-end" approach is novel because it allows the model to learn the connections between argument components as it's identifying them, rather than having to do those steps separately. The researchers believe this leads to a more natural and accurate analysis of argumentative text.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an end-to-end argument mining approach that frames the task as an augmented natural language generation problem. Their model, called ARGMAR, is a transformer-based language model that is trained to generate argument components (e.g. claims, premises) and classify the relations between them (e.g. support, attack).

This contrasts with traditional argument mining, which often treats component identification and relation classification as separate tasks. By incorporating both into a single generative model, ARGMAR can learn the connections between components and relations more effectively.

The model is trained onArgumentative Natural Language Inference (ANLI) datasets, which provide annotated argumentative text. During training, the model is tasked with generating the argument components and classifying the relations between them, given the input text.

Experiments show that ARGMAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark argument mining datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of the end-to-end generative approach. The authors also present analyses highlighting the model's ability to capture complex argumentative structures.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to argument mining that offers several advantages over traditional pipeline models. By jointly modeling component identification and relation classification, the end-to-end framework can better capture the interdependencies in argumentative structure.

However, the authors acknowledge some limitations. The model is primarily evaluated on English datasets, so its performance and generalizability across languages is unclear. Additionally, the reliance on large, high-quality annotated datasets for training may limit the model's scalability and applicability to domains with limited data.

Further research could explore ways to improve sample efficiency, such as few-shot learning techniques or unsupervised pretraining. Incorporating additional contextual information, like speaker identity or topic, may also help the model better understand the nuances of argumentation.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of argument mining by demonstrating the potential of end-to-end generative approaches. As the authors note, further advancements in this direction could lead to more robust and versatile argument analysis systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel end-to-end approach to argument mining that jointly identifies argument components and classifies the relations between them. By framing the task as an augmented natural language generation problem, the researchers have developed a model that can learn the interdependencies in argumentative structure more effectively than traditional pipeline models.

The proposed ARGMAR model achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets, showcasing the potential of this generative paradigm for argument mining. While the approach has some limitations, such as its reliance on large annotated datasets, the paper demonstrates a promising direction for future research in this area.

As argument mining systems become more sophisticated, they could have important applications in domains like policy debate, legal reasoning, and educational assessment. The work presented in this paper represents a significant step forward in realizing the full potential of computational argument analysis.