Analogical proportions II
0
👀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the mathematical theory of analogical reasoning, a fundamental human capacity used for commonsense reasoning, learning, and creativity.
- Analogical proportions, expressions of the form "A is to B what C is to D," are at the core of analogical reasoning.
- The authors have previously introduced an abstract algebraic framework for studying analogical proportions, and this paper further develops that mathematical theory.
- The work is motivated by the successful application of this framework to logic program synthesis in artificial intelligence.
Plain English Explanation
Analogical reasoning is the ability to see connections between two seemingly different things. It's a key part of how humans think, learn, and be creative. For example, we might notice that the relationship between a dog and a puppy is similar to the relationship between a cat and a kitten.
At the heart of analogical reasoning are analogical proportions, which express these connections in the form "A is to B what C is to D." The authors of this paper have previously developed a mathematical framework for studying analogical proportions, and this new paper goes deeper into that theoretical work.
This research is important because analogical reasoning is believed to be a core part of human intelligence and artificial general intelligence. By better understanding the mathematics behind it, we may gain insights that help us build more intelligent AI systems and unlock the power of analogical reasoning in language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper builds on the authors' previous work introducing an abstract algebraic framework for studying analogical proportions. Within this framework, the authors further develop the mathematical theory of analogical proportions.
The key elements of this technical work include:
- Defining formal properties and operations related to analogical proportions
- Exploring the connections between analogical proportions and other algebraic structures
- Investigating the computational complexity of reasoning with analogical proportions
The authors demonstrate how this theoretical foundation has already been successfully applied to logic program synthesis in artificial intelligence. This suggests the potential for this framework to yield insights that can be translated into practical applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical treatment of analogical reasoning, but as with any theoretical work, there are some caveats and limitations to consider.
One potential concern is the extent to which this abstract algebraic framework fully captures the nuances and complexities of human analogical reasoning. While the framework may be a useful mathematical model, it remains to be seen how well it aligns with the cognitive processes underlying analogical thinking in the brain.
Additionally, the focus on the computational complexity of reasoning with analogical proportions raises questions about the scalability of these techniques. As the size and complexity of the knowledge representations grow, the computational challenges may become increasingly prohibitive.
Further research will be needed to address these concerns and explore ways to bridge the gap between the mathematical theory and practical implementation in intelligent systems. Nonetheless, this work represents an important contribution to the fundamental understanding of analogical reasoning, with potential implications for both artificial intelligence and our understanding of human cognition.
Conclusion
This paper presents a detailed mathematical framework for studying analogical proportions, which are at the core of the fundamental human capacity for analogical reasoning. By further developing this theoretical foundation, the authors aim to unlock insights that can be applied to the design of more intelligent artificial systems and enhance our understanding of human intelligence.
While the technical work is complex, the potential implications are significant. Analogical reasoning is believed to be a key component of human-level intelligence, and by studying it through the lens of abstract algebra, we may uncover principles that can be leveraged to push the boundaries of what is possible in artificial intelligence and enable language models to truly understand and reason with analogies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
0
Analogical proportions II
Christian Anti'c
Analogical reasoning is the ability to detect parallels between two seemingly distant objects or situations, a fundamental human capacity used for example in commonsense reasoning, learning, and creativity which is believed by many researchers to be at the core of human and artificial general intelligence. Analogical proportions are expressions of the form ``$a$ is to $b$ what $c$ is to $d$'' at the core of analogical reasoning. The author has recently introduced an abstract algebraic framework of analogical proportions within the general setting of universal algebra. It is the purpose of this paper to further develop the mathematical theory of analogical proportions within that framework as motivated by the fact that it has already been successfully applied to logic program synthesis in artificial intelligence.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Frank's triangular norms in Piaget's logical proportions
Henri Prade, Gilles Richard
Starting from the Boolean notion of logical proportion in Piaget's sense, which turns out to be equivalent to analogical proportion, this note proposes a definition of analogical proportion between numerical values based on triangular norms (and dual co-norms). Frank's family of triangular norms is particularly interesting from this perspective. The article concludes with a comparative discussion with another very recent proposal for defining analogical proportions between numerical values based on the family of generalized means.
Read more8/9/2024
💬
0
ANALOGYKB: Unlocking Analogical Reasoning of Language Models with A Million-scale Knowledge Base
Siyu Yuan, Jiangjie Chen, Changzhi Sun, Jiaqing Liang, Yanghua Xiao, Deqing Yang
Analogical reasoning is a fundamental cognitive ability of humans. However, current language models (LMs) still struggle to achieve human-like performance in analogical reasoning tasks due to a lack of resources for model training. In this work, we address this gap by proposing ANALOGYKB, a million-scale analogy knowledge base (KB) derived from existing knowledge graphs (KGs). ANALOGYKB identifies two types of analogies from the KGs: 1) analogies of the same relations, which can be directly extracted from the KGs, and 2) analogies of analogous relations, which are identified with a selection and filtering pipeline enabled by large language models (LLMs), followed by minor human efforts for data quality control. Evaluations on a series of datasets of two analogical reasoning tasks (analogy recognition and generation) demonstrate that ANALOGYKB successfully enables both smaller LMs and LLMs to gain better analogical reasoning capabilities.
Read more5/20/2024
🔍
0
ARN: Analogical Reasoning on Narratives
Zhivar Sourati, Filip Ilievski, Pia Sommerauer, Yifan Jiang
As a core cognitive skill that enables the transferability of information across domains, analogical reasoning has been extensively studied for both humans and computational models. However, while cognitive theories of analogy often focus on narratives and study the distinction between surface, relational, and system similarities, existing work in natural language processing has a narrower focus as far as relational analogies between word pairs. This gap brings a natural question: can state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) detect system analogies between narratives? To gain insight into this question and extend word-based relational analogies to relational system analogies, we devise a comprehensive computational framework that operationalizes dominant theories of analogy, using narrative elements to create surface and system mappings. Leveraging the interplay between these mappings, we create a binary task and benchmark for Analogical Reasoning on Narratives (ARN), covering four categories of far (cross-domain)/near (within-domain) analogies and disanalogies. We show that while all LLMs can largely recognize near analogies, even the largest ones struggle with far analogies in a zero-shot setting, with GPT4.0 scoring below random. Guiding the models through solved examples and chain-of-thought reasoning enhances their analogical reasoning ability. Yet, since even in the few-shot setting, the best model only performs halfway between random and humans, ARN opens exciting directions for computational analogical reasoners.
Read more9/5/2024