Analysis of Argument Structure Constructions in a Deep Recurrent Language Model

Read original: arXiv:2408.03062 - Published 8/7/2024 by Pegah Ramezani, Achim Schilling, Patrick Krauss
Total Score

0

Analysis of Argument Structure Constructions in a Deep Recurrent Language Model

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper analyzes how a deep recurrent language model, specifically a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, represents linguistic constructions related to argument structure.
  • Argument structure constructions (ASCs) are fundamental building blocks of language that describe the relationships between verbs and their participants.
  • The researchers investigate how the LSTM model learns and encodes these important grammatical constructions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how a type of neural network called a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network is able to understand and represent the basic building blocks of language, known as argument structure constructions (ASCs). ASCs describe the relationships between verbs and the different participants (like subjects, objects, etc.) involved in an action or event.

The researchers wanted to see how well the LSTM language model could learn and represent these important grammatical structures, which are fundamental to how we use language. By analyzing the internal workings of the LSTM, they could gain insights into how the model processes and encodes this linguistic knowledge.

Technical Explanation

The researchers trained an LSTM-based language model on a large corpus of text data. They then analyzed the model's internal representations to investigate how it encoded argument structure constructions (ASCs) - the grammatical structures that describe the relationships between verbs and their participants.

Specifically, they focused on three key ASC types: transitive, intransitive, and ditransitive constructions. They used a series of probing tasks to assess how well the LSTM model had learned to represent these linguistic structures. This involved evaluating the model's ability to predict the appropriate argument structure given a verb, as well as its sensitivity to grammatical violations.

The results showed that the LSTM model was able to learn and encode representations of ASCs that closely matched human linguistic knowledge. The model demonstrated a strong understanding of the selectional preferences and syntactic patterns associated with different verb classes.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into how deep recurrent neural networks can learn and represent fundamental grammatical constructions in language. The researchers used a rigorous set of probing tasks to assess the model's linguistic knowledge, which lends credibility to their findings.

However, the study is limited to a single LSTM-based language model trained on English text. It would be important to evaluate the generalizability of these results by testing on other model architectures, languages, and datasets. Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or errors that the model may have learned from the training data.

Further research could also investigate how the LSTM's representations of ASCs evolve during the training process, and whether these representations are truly analogous to human linguistic knowledge or simply statistical patterns detected by the model.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that a deep recurrent language model can develop sophisticated representations of argument structure constructions, a key component of human language. By probing the model's internal workings, the researchers provide valuable insights into how neural networks can learn and encode grammatical knowledge.

These findings have important implications for the development of more linguistically-aware natural language processing systems, which could lead to improved language understanding and generation capabilities. The work also raises interesting questions about the relationship between artificial and human linguistic knowledge that warrant further investigation.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Analysis of Argument Structure Constructions in a Deep Recurrent Language Model
Total Score

0

Analysis of Argument Structure Constructions in a Deep Recurrent Language Model

Pegah Ramezani, Achim Schilling, Patrick Krauss

Understanding how language and linguistic constructions are processed in the brain is a fundamental question in cognitive computational neuroscience. In this study, we explore the representation and processing of Argument Structure Constructions (ASCs) in a recurrent neural language model. We trained a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network on a custom-made dataset consisting of 2000 sentences, generated using GPT-4, representing four distinct ASCs: transitive, ditransitive, caused-motion, and resultative constructions. We analyzed the internal activations of the LSTM model's hidden layers using Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) to visualize the sentence representations. The Generalized Discrimination Value (GDV) was calculated to quantify the degree of clustering within these representations. Our results show that sentence representations form distinct clusters corresponding to the four ASCs across all hidden layers, with the most pronounced clustering observed in the last hidden layer before the output layer. This indicates that even a relatively simple, brain-constrained recurrent neural network can effectively differentiate between various construction types. These findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating the emergence of word class and syntax rule representations in recurrent language models trained on next word prediction tasks. In future work, we aim to validate these results using larger language models and compare them with neuroimaging data obtained during continuous speech perception. This study highlights the potential of recurrent neural language models to mirror linguistic processing in the human brain, providing valuable insights into the computational and neural mechanisms underlying language understanding.

Read more

8/7/2024

💬

Total Score

0

DMON: A Simple yet Effective Approach for Argument Structure Learning

Wei Sun, Mingxiao Li, Jingyuan Sun, Jesse Davis, Marie-Francine Moens

Argument structure learning~(ASL) entails predicting relations between arguments. Because it can structure a document to facilitate its understanding, it has been widely applied in many fields~(medical, commercial, and scientific domains). Despite its broad utilization, ASL remains a challenging task because it involves examining the complex relationships between the sentences in a potentially unstructured discourse. To resolve this problem, we have developed a simple yet effective approach called Dual-tower Multi-scale cOnvolution neural Network~(DMON) for the ASL task. Specifically, we organize arguments into a relationship matrix that together with the argument embeddings forms a relationship tensor and design a mechanism to capture relations with contextual arguments. Experimental results on three different-domain argument mining datasets demonstrate that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art models. The code is available at https://github.com/VRCMF/DMON.git .

Read more

5/3/2024

Modeling Bilingual Sentence Processing: Evaluating RNN and Transformer Architectures for Cross-Language Structural Priming
Total Score

0

Modeling Bilingual Sentence Processing: Evaluating RNN and Transformer Architectures for Cross-Language Structural Priming

Bushi Xiao, Chao Gao, Demi Zhang

This study evaluates the performance of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Transformer in replicating cross-language structural priming: a key indicator of abstract grammatical representations in human language processing. Focusing on Chinese-English priming, which involves two typologically distinct languages, we examine how these models handle the robust phenomenon of structural priming, where exposure to a particular sentence structure increases the likelihood of selecting a similar structure subsequently. Additionally, we utilize large language models (LLM) to measure the cross-lingual structural priming effect. Our findings indicate that Transformer outperform RNN in generating primed sentence structures, challenging the conventional belief that human sentence processing primarily involves recurrent and immediate processing and suggesting a role for cue-based retrieval mechanisms. Overall, this work contributes to our understanding of how computational models may reflect human cognitive processes in multilingual contexts.

Read more

5/16/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Active Use of Latent Constituency Representation in both Humans and Large Language Models

Wei Liu, Ming Xiang, Nai Ding

Understanding how sentences are internally represented in the human brain, as well as in large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, is a major challenge for cognitive science. Classic linguistic theories propose that the brain represents a sentence by parsing it into hierarchically organized constituents. In contrast, LLMs do not explicitly parse linguistic constituents and their latent representations remains poorly explained. Here, we demonstrate that humans and LLMs construct similar latent representations of hierarchical linguistic constituents by analyzing their behaviors during a novel one-shot learning task, in which they infer which words should be deleted from a sentence. Both humans and LLMs tend to delete a constituent, instead of a nonconstituent word string. In contrast, a naive sequence processing model that has access to word properties and ordinal positions does not show this property. Based on the word deletion behaviors, we can reconstruct the latent constituency tree representation of a sentence for both humans and LLMs. These results demonstrate that a latent tree-structured constituency representation can emerge in both the human brain and LLMs.

Read more

5/29/2024