Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper analyzes and estimates support for U.S. presidential candidates on Twitter, a popular social media platform, by examining poll results.
- The researchers investigate factors that may influence the accuracy of Twitter polls, such as the prevalence and distribution of different types of users, biases, and other characteristics of the Twitter platform.
- The findings provide insights into the reliability of using social media data, specifically Twitter, to predict election outcomes.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper looked at how well Twitter polls can predict support for U.S. presidential candidates. They wanted to understand what factors might affect the accuracy of these Twitter polls, like the types of people using Twitter, potential biases, and other characteristics of the Twitter platform.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected data on Twitter polls about U.S. presidential candidates and compared the poll results to actual election outcomes. They analyzed factors like the prevalence and distribution of different types of Twitter users, potential biases in who participates in the polls, and other characteristics of the Twitter platform that could impact the accuracy of the polls.
The study design involved gathering data on Twitter polls about U.S. presidential candidates and comparing the poll results to the actual election results. The researchers then analyzed various aspects of the Twitter platform and user population that could influence the reliability of using Twitter data to predict election outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges some limitations of the research, such as the potential for selection bias in who participates in Twitter polls and the challenges of generalizing the findings to other social media platforms or electoral contexts.
While the researchers raise important caveats about the limitations of their study, there may be additional concerns that were not addressed, such as the potential for coordinated disinformation campaigns on social media to skew poll results. Further research is needed to fully understand the reliability and potential biases of using social media data for election forecasting.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the factors that can influence the accuracy of using Twitter polls to estimate support for U.S. presidential candidates. The findings suggest that social media data, while informative, may not be a reliable sole predictor of election outcomes due to platform-specific biases and other limitations.
The researchers' work highlights the need for a more nuanced and multifaceted approach to leveraging social media data, alongside other information sources, to better understand and predict election dynamics. Continued research in this area can help strengthen the integrity of the electoral process in the digital age.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls
Stephen Scarano, Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan, Chhandak Bagchi, Mattia Samory, JungHwan Yang, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
Polls posted on social media have emerged in recent years as an important tool for estimating public opinion, e.g., to gauge public support for business decisions and political candidates in national elections. Here, we examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. First, we describe the rapidly emerging prevalence of social polls. Second, we characterize social polls in terms of their heterogeneity and response options. Third, leveraging machine learning models for user attribute inference, we describe the demographics, political leanings, and other characteristics of the users who author and interact with social polls. Finally, we study the relationship between social poll results, their attributes, and the characteristics of users interacting with them. Our findings reveal that Twitter polls are biased in various ways, starting from the position of the presidential candidates among the poll options to biases in demographic attributes and poll results. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump, in contrast to traditional surveys, which favored Democratic candidates. We further identify and explore the potential reasons for such biases in social polling and discuss their potential repercussions. Finally, we show that biases in social media polls can be corrected via regression and poststratification. The errors of the resulting election estimates can be as low as 1%-2%, suggesting that social media polls can become a promising source of information about public opinion.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs
Stephen Scarano, Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan, Mattia Samory, Kai-Cheng Yang, JungHwan Yang, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
Social media platforms allow users to create polls to gather public opinion on diverse topics. However, we know little about what such polls are used for and how reliable they are, especially in significant contexts like elections. Focusing on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S., this study shows that outcomes of election polls on Twitter deviate from election results despite their prevalence. Leveraging demographic inference and statistical analysis, we find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by older males and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump relative to representative mainstream polls. We investigate potential sources of biased outcomes from the point of view of inauthentic, automated, and counter-normative behavior. Using social media experiments and interviews with poll authors, we identify inconsistencies between public vote counts and those privately visible to poll authors, with the gap potentially attributable to purchased votes. We also find that Twitter accounts participating in election polls are more likely to be bots, and election poll outcomes tend to be more biased, before the election day than after. Finally, we identify instances of polls spreading voter fraud conspiracy theories and estimate that a couple thousand of such polls were posted in 2020. The study discusses the implications of biased election polls in the context of transparency and accountability of social media platforms.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Media
Gabriele Di Bona, Emma Fraxanet, Bjorn Komander, Andrea Lo Sasso, Virginia Morini, Antoine Vendeville, Max Falkenberg, Alessandro Galeazzi
Following recent policy changes by X (Twitter) and other social media platforms, user interaction data has become increasingly difficult to access. These restrictions are impeding robust research pertaining to social and political phenomena online, which is critical due to the profound impact social media platforms may have on our societies. Here, we investigate the reliability of polarization measures obtained from different samples of social media data by studying the structural polarization of the Polish political debate on Twitter over a 24-hour period. First, we show that the political discussion on Twitter is only a small subset of the wider Twitter discussion. Second, we find that large samples can be representative of the whole political discussion on a platform, but small samples consistently fail to accurately reflect the true structure of polarization online. Finally, we demonstrate that keyword-based samples can be representative if keywords are selected with great care, but that poorly selected keywords can result in substantial political bias in the sampled data. Our findings demonstrate that it is not possible to measure polarization in a reliable way with small, sampled datasets, highlighting why the current lack of research data is so problematic, and providing insight into the practical implementation of the European Union's Digital Service Act which aims to improve researchers' access to social media data.
Read more7/1/2024
🖼️
0
Can LLMs Help Predict Elections? (Counter)Evidence from the World's Largest Democracy
Pratik Gujral, Kshitij Awaldhi, Navya Jain, Bhavuk Bhandula, Abhijnan Chakraborty
The study of how social media affects the formation of public opinion and its influence on political results has been a popular field of inquiry. However, current approaches frequently offer a limited comprehension of the complex political phenomena, yielding inconsistent outcomes. In this work, we introduce a new method: harnessing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to examine social media data and forecast election outcomes. Our research diverges from traditional methodologies in two crucial respects. First, we utilize the sophisticated capabilities of foundational LLMs, which can comprehend the complex linguistic subtleties and contextual details present in social media data. Second, we focus on data from X (Twitter) in India to predict state assembly election outcomes. Our method entails sentiment analysis of election-related tweets through LLMs to forecast the actual election results, and we demonstrate the superiority of our LLM-based method against more traditional exit and opinion polls. Overall, our research offers valuable insights into the unique dynamics of Indian politics and the remarkable impact of social media in molding public attitudes within this context.
Read more5/14/2024