Can LLMs Help Predict Elections? (Counter)Evidence from the World's Largest Democracy
2405.07828
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
The study of how social media affects the formation of public opinion and its influence on political results has been a popular field of inquiry. However, current approaches frequently offer a limited comprehension of the complex political phenomena, yielding inconsistent outcomes. In this work, we introduce a new method: harnessing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to examine social media data and forecast election outcomes. Our research diverges from traditional methodologies in two crucial respects. First, we utilize the sophisticated capabilities of foundational LLMs, which can comprehend the complex linguistic subtleties and contextual details present in social media data. Second, we focus on data from X (Twitter) in India to predict state assembly election outcomes. Our method entails sentiment analysis of election-related tweets through LLMs to forecast the actual election results, and we demonstrate the superiority of our LLM-based method against more traditional exit and opinion polls. Overall, our research offers valuable insights into the unique dynamics of Indian politics and the remarkable impact of social media in molding public attitudes within this context.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to analyze social media data and forecast election outcomes, focusing on elections in India.
- The study departs from traditional approaches by leveraging the advanced capabilities of LLMs to understand the nuanced linguistic and contextual details in social media data.
- The researchers use sentiment analysis of Twitter data to predict state assembly election results in India, and compare their LLM-based method to traditional exit and opinion polls.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to analyze social media data and forecast election outcomes, with a focus on elections in India. Traditional approaches often struggle to fully capture the complex political dynamics at play, leading to inconsistent results.
The researchers in this study take a different approach by harnessing the sophisticated capabilities of LLMs. These advanced language models can understand the subtle nuances and contextual details present in social media data, such as tweets. By analyzing the sentiment expressed in election-related tweets using LLMs, the researchers are able to predict the actual outcomes of state assembly elections in India.
This method is compared to more traditional techniques like exit polls and opinion surveys. The results demonstrate that the LLM-based approach is superior in forecasting the election results, offering valuable insights into the unique dynamics of Indian politics and the significant influence of social media on public opinion.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this study utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) to examine social media data and predict election outcomes, focusing on state assembly elections in India. This approach differs from traditional methods in two key ways:
-
Leveraging the advanced capabilities of foundational LLMs to comprehend the complex linguistic subtleties and contextual details present in social media data, such as Twitter posts.
-
Concentrating on data from Twitter in India to forecast the results of state assembly elections, rather than relying on conventional exit polls or opinion surveys.
The researchers' method involves sentiment analysis of election-related tweets using LLMs to predict the actual election outcomes. They demonstrate that their LLM-based approach outperforms more traditional forecasting techniques, providing valuable insights into the unique dynamics of Indian politics and the significant impact of social media on shaping public attitudes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to leveraging LLMs for analyzing social media data and predicting election results. However, the researchers acknowledge certain limitations and areas for further research:
- The study focuses on a specific context (Indian state elections) and social media platform (Twitter), which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
- The researchers do not provide a detailed comparison of their LLM-based method against other advanced techniques, such as AI-augmented surveys or more sophisticated natural language processing approaches.
- The paper does not address potential biases or inaccuracies that may arise from relying on social media data, which may not be representative of the broader electorate.
Further research could explore the application of this LLM-based approach in other political contexts, as well as comparative analyses with alternative methodologies. Additionally, addressing the limitations around social media data bias and model interpretability would strengthen the validity and reliability of the findings.
Conclusion
This research presents a novel approach to leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for analyzing social media data and forecasting election outcomes, with a focus on state assembly elections in India. By harnessing the sophisticated capabilities of LLMs to understand the nuanced linguistic and contextual details in social media posts, the researchers demonstrate that their method outperforms traditional forecasting techniques, such as exit polls and opinion surveys.
The findings offer valuable insights into the unique dynamics of Indian politics and the significant impact of social media on shaping public opinion. This research highlights the potential of LLMs to enhance our understanding of complex political phenomena and inform more accurate election forecasting. As the influence of social media continues to grow, this study paves the way for further exploration of advanced computational techniques in the realm of political analysis and public opinion research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Large Language Models (LLMs) as Agents for Augmented Democracy
Jairo Gudi~no-Rosero, Umberto Grandi, C'esar A. Hidalgo
0
0
We explore the capabilities of an augmented democracy system built on off-the-shelf LLMs fine-tuned on data summarizing individual preferences across 67 policy proposals collected during the 2022 Brazilian presidential elections. We use a train-test cross-validation setup to estimate the accuracy with which the LLMs predict both: a subject's individual political choices and the aggregate preferences of the full sample of participants. At the individual level, the accuracy of the out of sample predictions lie in the range 69%-76% and are significantly better at predicting the preferences of liberal and college educated participants. At the population level, we aggregate preferences using an adaptation of the Borda score and compare the ranking of policy proposals obtained from a probabilistic sample of participants and from data augmented using LLMs. We find that the augmented data predicts the preferences of the full population of participants better than probabilistic samples alone when these represent less than 30% to 40% of the total population. These results indicate that LLMs are potentially useful for the construction of systems of augmented democracy.
5/8/2024
💬
Assessing Political Bias in Large Language Models
Luca Rettenberger, Markus Reischl, Mark Schutera
0
0
The assessment of bias within Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a critical concern in the contemporary discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of their potential impact on societal dynamics. Recognizing and considering political bias within LLM applications is especially important when closing in on the tipping point toward performative prediction. Then, being educated about potential effects and the societal behavior LLMs can drive at scale due to their interplay with human operators. In this way, the upcoming elections of the European Parliament will not remain unaffected by LLMs. We evaluate the political bias of the currently most popular open-source LLMs (instruct or assistant models) concerning political issues within the European Union (EU) from a German voter's perspective. To do so, we use the Wahl-O-Mat, a voting advice application used in Germany. From the voting advice of the Wahl-O-Mat we quantize the degree of alignment of LLMs with German political parties. We show that larger models, such as Llama3-70B, tend to align more closely with left-leaning political parties, while smaller models often remain neutral, particularly when prompted in English. The central finding is that LLMs are similarly biased, with low variances in the alignment concerning a specific party. Our findings underline the importance of rigorously assessing and making bias transparent in LLMs to safeguard the integrity and trustworthiness of applications that employ the capabilities of performative prediction and the invisible hand of machine learning prediction and language generation.
6/6/2024
💬
Large Language Models' Detection of Political Orientation in Newspapers
Alessio Buscemi, Daniele Proverbio
0
0
Democratic opinion-forming may be manipulated if newspapers' alignment to political or economical orientation is ambiguous. Various methods have been developed to better understand newspapers' positioning. Recently, the advent of Large Language Models (LLM), and particularly the pre-trained LLM chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini, hold disruptive potential to assist researchers and citizens alike. However, little is know on whether LLM assessment is trustworthy: do single LLM agrees with experts' assessment, and do different LLMs answer consistently with one another? In this paper, we address specifically the second challenge. We compare how four widely employed LLMs rate the positioning of newspapers, and compare if their answers align with one another. We observe that this is not the case. Over a woldwide dataset, articles in newspapers are positioned strikingly differently by single LLMs, hinting to inconsistent training or excessive randomness in the algorithms. We thus raise a warning when deciding which tools to use, and we call for better training and algorithm development, to cover such significant gap in a highly sensitive matter for democracy and societies worldwide. We also call for community engagement in benchmark evaluation, through our open initiative navai.pro.
6/4/2024
Using RL to Identify Divisive Perspectives Improves LLMs Abilities to Identify Communities on Social Media
Nikhil Mehta, Dan Goldwasser
0
0
The large scale usage of social media, combined with its significant impact, has made it increasingly important to understand it. In particular, identifying user communities, can be helpful for many downstream tasks. However, particularly when models are trained on past data and tested on future, doing this is difficult. In this paper, we hypothesize to take advantage of Large Language Models (LLMs), to better identify user communities. Due to the fact that many LLMs, such as ChatGPT, are fixed and must be treated as black-boxes, we propose an approach to better prompt them, by training a smaller LLM to do this. We devise strategies to train this smaller model, showing how it can improve the larger LLMs ability to detect communities. Experimental results show improvements on Reddit and Twitter data, on the tasks of community detection, bot detection, and news media profiling.
6/4/2024