Anna Karenina Strikes Again: Pre-Trained LLM Embeddings May Favor High-Performing Learners
0
š
Sign in to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper investigates how pre-trained language model (LLM) embeddings may favor high-performing learners, drawing inspiration from the classic novel "Anna Karenina" where happy and unhappy families differ in specific ways.
ā¢ The researchers explore how LLM embeddings, which are widely used in machine learning tasks, can potentially amplify disparities in learning outcomes for different types of learners.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper looks at how the way language models are trained can give an advantage to certain types of learners over others. The authors use the famous novel "Anna Karenina" as an analogy - the book says that happy families are all alike, while each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.
The researchers suspect that the way these powerful language models are pre-trained on vast amounts of online data may mean they end up favoring learners who already perform well, while leaving behind those who struggle more. This could lead to unfair outcomes and widen existing gaps in learning and achievement.
The paper explores this idea in depth, looking at the technical details of how language model embeddings work and how they could potentially amplify disparities between different types of learners. The authors want to raise awareness of this issue and prompt further research into building more inclusive and equitable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines how pre-trained language model (LLM) embeddings, which are widely used in machine learning tasks, may inherently favor high-performing learners over others. The authors draw an analogy to the opening line of Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina" - "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way."
The researchers hypothesize that the way these powerful LLMs are pre-trained on large internet datasets may mean their internal representations and embeddings end up capturing patterns and structures that are more representative of successful or high-performing learners. This could then give those learners an advantage when using the LLM embeddings as inputs to downstream tasks.
To investigate this, the paper dives into the technical details of how LLM embeddings are constructed and how they are used in various machine learning applications. The authors discuss how the pre-training process and the structure of the LLM architectures could potentially lead to the encoding of "high-performing" patterns that are then amplified when the embeddings are used.
The paper also reviews related work on topics like text clustering with LLM embeddings, privacy risks of embeddings, interpretability of embeddings, and general properties of embeddings. These help situate the current work within the broader context of research on language model embeddings.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the potential for language model embeddings to perpetuate and exacerbate existing disparities in learning outcomes. While the authors acknowledge the limitations of their analysis, which is largely conceptual and theoretical, they make a compelling case that this is an issue worthy of further empirical investigation.
One key caveat is that the paper does not provide direct experimental evidence of the proposed "Anna Karenina" effect - it relies more on analogies and high-level reasoning. Further research would be needed to rigorously test whether pre-trained LLM embeddings do indeed exhibit systematic biases favoring high-performing learners.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential mitigating factors or solutions that could be explored to make LLM-based systems more equitable. Aspects like developing specialized healthcare language model embeddings or techniques for crafting more interpretable embeddings could be relevant avenues for future work.
Overall, the paper serves as a thought-provoking starting point for further research into the fairness and inclusiveness of language model representations. It encourages the AI community to think critically about the systemic biases that may be encoded in widely-used techniques like pre-trained embeddings.
Conclusion
This paper raises important concerns about the potential for pre-trained language model embeddings to favor high-performing learners over others, drawing an analogy to the opening of Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina." While the analysis is largely conceptual, the authors make a compelling case that this is an issue worthy of further empirical investigation.
The paper highlights the need for the AI research community to carefully consider the fairness and inclusiveness of the techniques they develop, as seemingly innocuous design choices in language models can potentially amplify existing disparities in learning and achievement. Continued work in this area could lead to more equitable and accessible AI systems that benefit all learners.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
0
Anna Karenina Strikes Again: Pre-Trained LLM Embeddings May Favor High-Performing Learners
Abigail Gurin Schleifer, Beata Beigman Klebanov, Moriah Ariely, Giora Alexandron
Unsupervised clustering of student responses to open-ended questions into behavioral and cognitive profiles using pre-trained LLM embeddings is an emerging technique, but little is known about how well this captures pedagogically meaningful information. We investigate this in the context of student responses to open-ended questions in biology, which were previously analyzed and clustered by experts into theory-driven Knowledge Profiles (KPs). Comparing these KPs to ones discovered by purely data-driven clustering techniques, we report poor discoverability of most KPs, except for the ones including the correct answers. We trace this discoverability bias to the representations of KPs in the pre-trained LLM embeddings space.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Text clustering with LLM embeddings
Alina Petukhova, Jo~ao P. Matos-Carvalho, Nuno Fachada
Text clustering is an important method for organising the increasing volume of digital content, aiding in the structuring and discovery of hidden patterns in uncategorised data. The effectiveness of text clustering largely depends on the selection of textual embeddings and clustering algorithms. This study argues that recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance this task. The research investigates how different textual embeddings, particularly those utilised in LLMs, and various clustering algorithms influence the clustering of text datasets. A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of embeddings on clustering results, the role of dimensionality reduction through summarisation, and the adjustment of model size. The findings indicate that LLM embeddings are superior at capturing subtleties in structured language. OpenAI's GPT-3.5 Turbo model yields better results in three out of five clustering metrics across most tested datasets. Most LLM embeddings show improvements in cluster purity and provide a more informative silhouette score, reflecting a refined structural understanding of text data compared to traditional methods. Among the more lightweight models, BERT demonstrates leading performance. Additionally, it was observed that increasing model dimensionality and employing summarisation techniques do not consistently enhance clustering efficiency, suggesting that these strategies require careful consideration for practical application. These results highlight a complex balance between the need for refined text representation and computational feasibility in text clustering applications. This study extends traditional text clustering frameworks by integrating embeddings from LLMs, offering improved methodologies and suggesting new avenues for future research in various types of textual analysis.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Understanding Privacy Risks of Embeddings Induced by Large Language Models
Zhihao Zhu, Ninglu Shao, Defu Lian, Chenwang Wu, Zheng Liu, Yi Yang, Enhong Chen
Large language models (LLMs) show early signs of artificial general intelligence but struggle with hallucinations. One promising solution to mitigate these hallucinations is to store external knowledge as embeddings, aiding LLMs in retrieval-augmented generation. However, such a solution risks compromising privacy, as recent studies experimentally showed that the original text can be partially reconstructed from text embeddings by pre-trained language models. The significant advantage of LLMs over traditional pre-trained models may exacerbate these concerns. To this end, we investigate the effectiveness of reconstructing original knowledge and predicting entity attributes from these embeddings when LLMs are employed. Empirical findings indicate that LLMs significantly improve the accuracy of two evaluated tasks over those from pre-trained models, regardless of whether the texts are in-distribution or out-of-distribution. This underscores a heightened potential for LLMs to jeopardize user privacy, highlighting the negative consequences of their widespread use. We further discuss preliminary strategies to mitigate this risk.
Read more4/26/2024
š¬
0
Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extraction
Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li
Large language models (LLMs) can store a vast amount of world knowledge, often extractable via question-answering (e.g., What is Abraham Lincoln's birthday?). However, do they answer such questions based on exposure to similar questions during training (i.e., cheating), or by genuinely learning to extract knowledge from sources like Wikipedia? In this paper, we investigate this issue using a controlled biography dataset. We find a strong correlation between the model's ability to extract knowledge and various diversity measures of the training data. $textbf{Essentially}$, for knowledge to be reliably extracted, it must be sufficiently augmented (e.g., through paraphrasing, sentence shuffling, translations) $textit{during pretraining}$. Without such augmentation, knowledge may be memorized but not extractable, leading to 0% accuracy, regardless of subsequent instruction fine-tuning. To understand why this occurs, we employ (nearly) linear probing to demonstrate a strong connection between the observed correlation and how the model internally encodes knowledge -- whether it is linearly encoded in the hidden embeddings of entity names or distributed across other token embeddings in the training text. This paper provides $textbf{several key recommendations for LLM pretraining in the industry}$: (1) rewrite the pretraining data -- using small, auxiliary models -- to provide knowledge augmentation, and (2) incorporate more instruction-finetuning data into the pretraining stage before it becomes too late.
Read more7/17/2024