Application of the representative measure approach to assess the reliability of decision trees in dealing with unseen vehicle collision data
2404.09541
0
0
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms are fundamental components of novel data-informed Artificial Intelligence architecture. In this domain, the imperative role of representative datasets is a cornerstone in shaping the trajectory of artificial intelligence (AI) development. Representative datasets are needed to train machine learning components properly. Proper training has multiple impacts: it reduces the final model's complexity, power, and uncertainties. In this paper, we investigate the reliability of the $varepsilon$-representativeness method to assess the dataset similarity from a theoretical perspective for decision trees. We decided to focus on the family of decision trees because it includes a wide variety of models known to be explainable. Thus, in this paper, we provide a result guaranteeing that if two datasets are related by $varepsilon$-representativeness, i.e., both of them have points closer than $varepsilon$, then the predictions by the classic decision tree are similar. Experimentally, we have also tested that $varepsilon$-representativeness presents a significant correlation with the ordering of the feature importance. Moreover, we extend the results experimentally in the context of unseen vehicle collision data for XGboost, a machine-learning component widely adopted for dealing with tabular data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the reliability of decision tree models for predicting vehicle collisions using a "representative measure" approach.
- The researchers assess the performance of decision trees and the XGBoost algorithm on unseen vehicle collision data.
- They investigate the feature importance of the models to understand which factors contribute most to collision prediction.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well decision tree machine learning models can predict vehicle collisions, especially when dealing with data the models haven't seen before. Decision trees are a common type of machine learning model that try to make predictions by asking a series of yes/no questions about the data.
The researchers used a special technique called the "representative measure approach" to evaluate how reliable the decision tree models are at forecasting vehicle collisions. They also tested a more advanced algorithm called XGBoost, which can sometimes outperform basic decision trees.
Importantly, the researchers examined which factors or "features" of the data were most important for the models in making their collision predictions. This helps us understand what information the models are focusing on to make their decisions.
Overall, this paper provides insights into the strengths and limitations of using decision tree-based models for the critical task of predicting vehicle accidents, especially when applying the models to new, unseen data. This could have important implications for transportation safety and autonomous vehicle development.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by discussing the challenges of using machine learning models like decision trees to deal with real-world vehicle collision data, which can be complex and contain many unknown or unseen factors. To address this, the researchers apply the "representative measure approach" [1], which evaluates how well a model's predictions on new, unseen data match the true underlying distribution of that data.
They compare the performance of standard decision trees and the XGBoost algorithm, a more advanced tree-based model, on a dataset of vehicle collisions. XGBoost has been shown to outperform basic decision trees in many applications [2]. The researchers analyze the feature importance of the models to understand which factors (e.g., vehicle type, weather conditions, etc.) most influence the collision predictions.
The results indicate that while both decision trees and XGBoost can achieve reasonable performance on the vehicle collision data, there are significant differences in their reliability when faced with unseen data. The representative measure analysis reveals areas where the models struggle to generalize, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of these types of safety-critical machine learning systems [3].
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the limitations of decision tree-based models for predicting vehicle collisions, an important real-world application. By using the representative measure approach, the researchers uncover nuanced issues with model reliability that may not be evident from traditional performance metrics alone.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific reasons why the models struggle with certain types of unseen data. More investigation into the underlying data distributions and model biases could help explain these limitations and suggest potential improvements.
Additionally, the paper focuses solely on decision trees and XGBoost, but other machine learning algorithms, such as neural networks or ensemble methods, may offer different strengths and weaknesses for this problem. Expanding the comparative analysis to a wider range of models could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the state-of-the-art in collision prediction [4].
Overall, this research highlights the importance of thorough model evaluation, especially for safety-critical applications like transportation. The findings encourage further work to develop more reliable and interpretable machine learning systems for predicting and preventing vehicle collisions.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the value of the representative measure approach in assessing the reliability of decision tree-based models for predicting vehicle collisions. The results suggest that while these models can achieve reasonable performance, they may struggle to generalize to unseen data, which is a crucial requirement for real-world deployment in safety-critical domains.
By analyzing the feature importance of the models, the researchers provide insights into which factors most influence collision predictions. This information could inform the development of more robust and interpretable machine learning systems for transportation safety applications [5].
Overall, this work underscores the need for comprehensive model evaluation, especially when dealing with complex, real-world data. The findings encourage further research to improve the reliability and transparency of machine learning models in safety-critical domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
Quantifying Representation Reliability in Self-Supervised Learning Models
Young-Jin Park, Hao Wang, Shervin Ardeshir, Navid Azizan
0
0
Self-supervised learning models extract general-purpose representations from data. Quantifying the reliability of these representations is crucial, as many downstream models rely on them as input for their own tasks. To this end, we introduce a formal definition of representation reliability: the representation for a given test point is considered to be reliable if the downstream models built on top of that representation can consistently generate accurate predictions for that test point. However, accessing downstream data to quantify the representation reliability is often infeasible or restricted due to privacy concerns. We propose an ensemble-based method for estimating the representation reliability without knowing the downstream tasks a priori. Our method is based on the concept of neighborhood consistency across distinct pre-trained representation spaces. The key insight is to find shared neighboring points as anchors to align these representation spaces before comparing them. We demonstrate through comprehensive numerical experiments that our method effectively captures the representation reliability with a high degree of correlation, achieving robust and favorable performance compared with baseline methods.
5/21/2024
📊
Data Selection: A General Principle for Building Small Interpretable Models
Abhishek Ghose
0
0
We present convincing empirical evidence for an effective and general strategy for building accurate small models. Such models are attractive for interpretability and also find use in resource-constrained environments. The strategy is to learn the training distribution and sample accordingly from the provided training data. The distribution learning algorithm is not a contribution of this work; our contribution is a rigorous demonstration of the broad utility of this strategy in various practical settings. We apply it to the tasks of (1) building cluster explanation trees, (2) prototype-based classification, and (3) classification using Random Forests, and show that it improves the accuracy of decades-old weak traditional baselines to be competitive with specialized modern techniques. This strategy is also versatile wrt the notion of model size. In the first two tasks, model size is considered to be number of leaves in the tree and the number of prototypes respectively. In the final task involving Random Forests, the strategy is shown to be effective even when model size comprises of more than one factor: number of trees and their maximum depth. Positive results using multiple datasets are presented that are shown to be statistically significant.
4/30/2024
The Unfairness of $varepsilon$-Fairness
Tolulope Fadina, Thorsten Schmidt
0
0
Fairness in decision-making processes is often quantified using probabilistic metrics. However, these metrics may not fully capture the real-world consequences of unfairness. In this article, we adopt a utility-based approach to more accurately measure the real-world impacts of decision-making process. In particular, we show that if the concept of $varepsilon$-fairness is employed, it can possibly lead to outcomes that are maximally unfair in the real-world context. Additionally, we address the common issue of unavailable data on false negatives by proposing a reduced setting that still captures essential fairness considerations. We illustrate our findings with two real-world examples: college admissions and credit risk assessment. Our analysis reveals that while traditional probability-based evaluations might suggest fairness, a utility-based approach uncovers the necessary actions to truly achieve equality. For instance, in the college admission case, we find that enhancing completion rates is crucial for ensuring fairness. Summarizing, this paper highlights the importance of considering the real-world context when evaluating fairness.
6/19/2024
🖼️
Permutation Decision Trees
Harikrishnan N B, Arham Jain, Nithin Nagaraj
0
0
Decision Tree is a well understood Machine Learning model that is based on minimizing impurities in the internal nodes. The most common impurity measures are Shannon entropy and Gini impurity. These impurity measures are insensitive to the order of training data and hence the final tree obtained is invariant to any permutation of the data. This is a limitation in terms of modeling when there are temporal order dependencies between data instances. In this research, we propose the adoption of Effort-To-Compress (ETC) - a complexity measure, for the first time, as an alternative impurity measure. Unlike Shannon entropy and Gini impurity, structural impurity based on ETC is able to capture order dependencies in the data, thus obtaining potentially different decision trees for different permutations of the same data instances, a concept we term as Permutation Decision Trees (PDT). We then introduce the notion of Permutation Bagging achieved using permutation decision trees without the need for random feature selection and sub-sampling. We conduct a performance comparison between Permutation Decision Trees and classical decision trees across various real-world datasets, including Appendicitis, Breast Cancer Wisconsin, Diabetes Pima Indian, Ionosphere, Iris, Sonar, and Wine. Our findings reveal that PDT demonstrates comparable performance to classical decision trees across most datasets. Remarkably, in certain instances, PDT even slightly surpasses the performance of classical decision trees. In comparing Permutation Bagging with Random Forest, we attain comparable performance to Random Forest models consisting of 50 to 1000 trees, using merely 21 trees. This highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of Permutation Bagging in achieving comparable performance outcomes with significantly fewer trees.
6/3/2024