Applying RLAIF for Code Generation with API-usage in Lightweight LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2406.20060 - Published 7/1/2024 by Sujan Dutta, Sayantan Mahinder, Raviteja Anantha, Bortik Bandyopadhyay
Total Score

0

Applying RLAIF for Code Generation with API-usage in Lightweight LLMs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach called Reinforcement Learning for API-usage Induction in Fine-tuning (RLAIF) for generating code with API usage in lightweight large language models (LLMs).
  • The authors explore the use of self-play and open-source feedback to align LLMs for faster code generation that adheres to API conventions.
  • The research builds on previous work on multi-objective reinforcement learning from AI feedback and performance-aligned LLMs for generating fast code.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new technique called RLAIF that helps lightweight language models generate code that properly uses application programming interfaces (APIs). APIs are the rules and specifications that allow different software components to communicate with each other.

The key idea is to use a combination of self-play (the model learning from its own generated code) and open-source feedback (learning from examples of well-written code) to train the model to produce code that follows API conventions. This helps the model generate code that is not only syntactically correct, but also uses the appropriate APIs in the right way.

The authors build on previous work that has shown how reinforcement learning from AI feedback and aligning language models to produce high-performance code can be effective approaches. The goal here is to apply these techniques to smaller, more lightweight language models, which could make them more practical for real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the RLAIF approach, which combines self-play and open-source feedback to train lightweight LLMs for code generation that adheres to API conventions.

In the self-play component, the model generates code and then evaluates its own performance using a reward function that incentivizes correct API usage. This allows the model to learn from its own mistakes and improve over time.

The open-source feedback component involves exposing the model to a large corpus of well-written, API-compliant code. The model learns to mimic the patterns and conventions used in this high-quality code, further reinforcing its understanding of proper API usage.

The authors evaluate RLAIF on a benchmark task of generating Python code that uses the Sklearn API. They find that RLAIF outperforms fine-tuning approaches that do not incorporate the self-play and open-source feedback mechanisms.

The self-play and execution feedback approach used in this work builds on the idea of aligning language models to generate fast code through multi-objective reinforcement learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to improving code generation in lightweight LLMs, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The evaluation is focused on a single API (Sklearn) and a specific programming language (Python). It would be important to test the generalizability of RLAIF to other APIs and programming languages.
  • The authors mention that the self-play component can be computationally expensive, which could be a challenge for deploying RLAIF in resource-constrained environments. Further optimizations may be needed.
  • The paper does not discuss how RLAIF could be extended to handle more complex, multi-file code generation tasks. Adapting the approach to handle larger, more realistic coding problems would be an important next step.

Overall, the RLAIF technique represents a promising direction for improving the code generation capabilities of lightweight LLMs, but more research is needed to fully understand its limitations and potential.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach called RLAIF that combines self-play and open-source feedback to train lightweight LLMs for code generation that adheres to API conventions. By leveraging these techniques, the authors have demonstrated the ability to produce code that not only is syntactically correct, but also properly utilizes the relevant APIs.

The research builds on previous work on multi-objective reinforcement learning from AI feedback and performance-aligned LLMs for generating fast code, and represents a promising step towards making lightweight language models more practical for real-world code generation tasks.

While the paper has some limitations, such as the need to further test the generalizability of the approach, it highlights the potential of combining self-play and open-source feedback to train language models to produce high-quality, API-compliant code. This could have significant implications for the development of more efficient and reliable software systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Applying RLAIF for Code Generation with API-usage in Lightweight LLMs
Total Score

0

Applying RLAIF for Code Generation with API-usage in Lightweight LLMs

Sujan Dutta, Sayantan Mahinder, Raviteja Anantha, Bortik Bandyopadhyay

Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) has demonstrated significant potential across various domains, including mitigating harm in LLM outputs, enhancing text summarization, and mathematical reasoning. This paper introduces an RLAIF framework for improving the code generation abilities of lightweight (<1B parameters) LLMs. We specifically focus on code generation tasks that require writing appropriate API calls, which is challenging due to the well-known issue of hallucination in LLMs. Our framework extracts AI feedback from a larger LLM (e.g., GPT-3.5) through a specialized prompting strategy and uses this data to train a reward model towards better alignment from smaller LLMs. We run our experiments on the Gorilla dataset and meticulously assess the quality of the model-generated code across various metrics, including AST, ROUGE, and Code-BLEU, and develop a pipeline to compute its executability rate accurately. Our approach significantly enhances the fine-tuned LLM baseline's performance, achieving a 4.5% improvement in executability rate. Notably, a smaller LLM model (780M parameters) trained with RLAIF surpasses a much larger fine-tuned baseline with 7B parameters, achieving a 1.0% higher code executability rate.

Read more

7/1/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback

Harrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard, Johan Ferret, Kellie Lu, Colton Bishop, Ethan Hall, Victor Carbune, Abhinav Rastogi, Sushant Prakash

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, but gathering high-quality preference labels is expensive. RL from AI Feedback (RLAIF), introduced in Bai et al., offers a promising alternative that trains the reward model (RM) on preferences generated by an off-the-shelf LLM. Across the tasks of summarization, helpful dialogue generation, and harmless dialogue generation, we show that RLAIF achieves comparable performance to RLHF. Furthermore, we take a step towards self-improvement by demonstrating that RLAIF can outperform a supervised fine-tuned baseline even when the AI labeler is the same size as the policy, or even the exact same checkpoint as the initial policy. Finally, we introduce direct-RLAIF (d-RLAIF) - a technique that circumvents RM training by obtaining rewards directly from an off-the-shelf LLM during RL, which achieves superior performance to canonical RLAIF. Our results suggest that RLAIF can achieve performance on-par with using human feedback, offering a potential solution to the scalability limitations of RLHF.

Read more

9/4/2024

RLAIF-V: Aligning MLLMs through Open-Source AI Feedback for Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness
Total Score

0

RLAIF-V: Aligning MLLMs through Open-Source AI Feedback for Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness

Tianyu Yu, Haoye Zhang, Yuan Yao, Yunkai Dang, Da Chen, Xiaoman Lu, Ganqu Cui, Taiwen He, Zhiyuan Liu, Tat-Seng Chua, Maosong Sun

Learning from feedback reduces the hallucination of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) by aligning them with human preferences. While traditional methods rely on labor-intensive and time-consuming manual labeling, recent approaches employing models as automatic labelers have shown promising results without human intervention. However, these methods heavily rely on costly proprietary models like GPT-4V, resulting in scalability issues. Moreover, this paradigm essentially distills the proprietary models to provide a temporary solution to quickly bridge the performance gap. As this gap continues to shrink, the community is soon facing the essential challenge of aligning MLLMs using labeler models of comparable capability. In this work, we introduce RLAIF-V, a novel framework that aligns MLLMs in a fully open-source paradigm for super GPT-4V trustworthiness. RLAIF-V maximally exploits the open-source feedback from two perspectives, including high-quality feedback data and online feedback learning algorithm. Extensive experiments on seven benchmarks in both automatic and human evaluation show that RLAIF-V substantially enhances the trustworthiness of models without sacrificing performance on other tasks. Using a 34B model as labeler, RLAIF-V 7B model reduces object hallucination by 82.9% and overall hallucination by 42.1%, outperforming the labeler model. Remarkably, RLAIF-V also reveals the self-alignment potential of open-source MLLMs, where a 12B model can learn from the feedback of itself to achieve less than 29.5% overall hallucination rate, surpassing GPT-4V (45.9%) by a large margin. The results shed light on a promising route to enhance the efficacy of leading-edge MLLMs.

Read more

5/28/2024

Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedback
Total Score

0

Multi-objective Reinforcement learning from AI Feedback

Marcus Williams

This paper presents Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (MORLAIF), a novel approach to improving the alignment and performance of language models trained using reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF). In contrast to standard approaches that train a single preference model to represent all human preferences, MORLAIF decomposes this task into multiple simpler principles, such as toxicity, factuality, and sycophancy. Separate preference models are trained for each principle using feedback from GPT-3.5-Turbo. These preference model scores are then combined using different scalarization functions to provide a reward signal for Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) training of the target language model. Our experiments indicate that MORLAIF outperforms the standard RLAIF baselines and that MORLAIF can be used to align larger language models using smaller ones. Surprisingly, the choice of scalarization function does not appear to significantly impact the results.

Read more

6/13/2024