Performance-Aligned LLMs for Generating Fast Code

2404.18864

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/30/2024 by Daniel Nichols, Pranav Polasam, Harshitha Menon, Aniruddha Marathe, Todd Gamblin, Abhinav Bhatele

Abstract

Optimizing scientific software is a difficult task because codebases are often large and complex, and performance can depend upon several factors including the algorithm, its implementation, and hardware among others. Causes of poor performance can originate from disparate sources and be difficult to diagnose. Recent years have seen a multitude of work that use large language models (LLMs) to assist in software development tasks. However, these tools are trained to model the distribution of code as text, and are not specifically designed to understand performance aspects of code. In this work, we introduce a reinforcement learning based methodology to align the outputs of code LLMs with performance. This allows us to build upon the current code modeling capabilities of LLMs and extend them to generate better performing code. We demonstrate that our fine-tuned model improves the expected speedup of generated code over base models for a set of benchmark tasks from 0.9 to 1.6 for serial code and 1.9 to 4.5 for OpenMP code.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Optimizing the performance of scientific software is a challenging task due to the complexity of codebase and various factors involved.
  • Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in assisting software development, but these models are not specifically designed to understand code performance.
  • This paper introduces a reinforcement learning-based approach to align the outputs of code LLMs with improved performance, extending their code modeling capabilities.
  • The authors demonstrate that their fine-tuned model generates code with better expected speedup compared to base models for both serial and parallel (OpenMP) benchmark tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Writing high-performance scientific software is tricky. The code can be huge and intricate, with many different things affecting how fast it runs, like the algorithm used, how it's implemented, and the hardware it runs on. It's hard to figure out what's causing poor performance, as the problems can come from all sorts of places.

In recent years, researchers have been using large language models (LLMs) to help with software development tasks. These models are trained on a lot of code, so they understand how code is typically written. However, they're not specifically designed to understand the performance aspects of code.

The researchers in this paper came up with a new way to train these LLMs to generate code that runs faster. They used a technique called reinforcement learning, which rewards the model for generating code that performs better. This allows the model to learn how to create code that not only looks right, but also runs efficiently.

When the researchers tested their fine-tuned model, they found that it was able to generate serial code that was about 60% faster on average, and parallel (OpenMP) code that was almost 4.5 times faster, compared to the original LLMs. This shows that their approach can help make scientific software run better without having to completely rewrite the code.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a reinforcement learning-based methodology to align the outputs of code LLMs with performance. They build upon the code modeling capabilities of existing LLMs, such as those used for code generation and data analysis, and extend them to generate code that achieves better performance.

The core idea is to fine-tune the LLM using a reward function that encourages the generation of code with improved performance, as measured by execution time. This is achieved by training the model on a dataset of synthetically generated code annotated with performance metrics.

The authors evaluate their approach on a set of benchmark tasks, comparing the performance of code generated by their fine-tuned model to that of base LLMs. They find that their model improves the expected speedup from 0.9 to 1.6 for serial code and from 1.9 to 4.5 for OpenMP code, demonstrating the effectiveness of their reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to improving the performance of code generated by LLMs, which is an important step towards making these models more useful for scientific software development. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their work.

First, the performance evaluation is limited to a small set of benchmark tasks, and it's unclear how well the fine-tuned model would generalize to a wider range of scientific software. Additionally, the authors note that their approach relies on the availability of a dataset of synthetic code annotated with performance metrics, which may not always be easy to obtain.

Another potential concern is that the reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning might lead to overfitting, where the model performs well on the specific tasks it was trained on but fails to generalize to new, unseen code. Further research is needed to explore the robustness and scalability of this approach.

Finally, the paper does not address the interpretability of the fine-tuned model, which is an important consideration for scientific applications where transparency and explainability are crucial. Analyzing the performance of large language models in code summarization tasks could provide insights into this aspect.

Overall, the work presented in this paper represents an important step towards improving the performance of code generated by LLMs, but more research is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and potential applications of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel reinforcement learning-based methodology to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) to generate code with improved performance. By aligning the model's outputs with execution time, the researchers were able to demonstrate significant speedups in the generated code compared to base LLMs, for both serial and parallel (OpenMP) benchmark tasks.

This work highlights the potential of using advanced machine learning techniques to enhance the capabilities of LLMs beyond their traditional text-based modeling, extending them to tackle the crucial challenge of optimizing scientific software performance. As LLMs continue to play an increasingly important role in assisting with code generation and other software development tasks, approaches like the one presented in this paper will be essential for unlocking their full potential in scientific computing and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔮

Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits

Alexander Shypula, Aman Madaan, Yimeng Zeng, Uri Alon, Jacob Gardner, Milad Hashemi, Graham Neubig, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Osbert Bastani, Amir Yazdanbakhsh

YC

0

Reddit

0

With the decline of Moore's law, optimizing program performance has become a major focus of software research. However, high-level optimizations such as API and algorithm changes remain elusive due to the difficulty of understanding the semantics of code. Simultaneously, pretrained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities at solving a wide range of programming tasks. To that end, we introduce a framework for adapting LLMs to high-level program optimization. First, we curate a dataset of performance-improving edits made by human programmers of over 77,000 competitive C++ programming submission pairs, accompanied by extensive unit tests. A major challenge is the significant variability of measuring performance on commodity hardware, which can lead to spurious improvements. To isolate and reliably evaluate the impact of program optimizations, we design an environment based on the gem5 full system simulator, the de facto simulator used in academia and industry. Next, we propose a broad range of adaptation strategies for code optimization; for prompting, these include retrieval-based few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought, and for finetuning, these include performance-conditioned generation and synthetic data augmentation based on self-play. A combination of these techniques achieves a mean speedup of 6.86 with eight generations, higher than average optimizations from individual programmers (3.66). Using our model's fastest generations, we set a new upper limit on the fastest speedup possible for our dataset at 9.64 compared to using the fastest human submissions available (9.56).

Read more

4/29/2024

🛸

LLMs for Science: Usage for Code Generation and Data Analysis

Mohamed Nejjar, Luca Zacharias, Fabian Stiehle, Ingo Weber

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) have been touted to enable increased productivity in many areas of today's work life. Scientific research as an area of work is no exception: the potential of LLM-based tools to assist in the daily work of scientists has become a highly discussed topic across disciplines. However, we are only at the very onset of this subject of study. It is still unclear how the potential of LLMs will materialise in research practice. With this study, we give first empirical evidence on the use of LLMs in the research process. We have investigated a set of use cases for LLM-based tools in scientific research, and conducted a first study to assess to which degree current tools are helpful. In this paper we report specifically on use cases related to software engineering, such as generating application code and developing scripts for data analytics. While we studied seemingly simple use cases, results across tools differ significantly. Our results highlight the promise of LLM-based tools in general, yet we also observe various issues, particularly regarding the integrity of the output these tools provide.

Read more

4/24/2024

HPC-Coder: Modeling Parallel Programs using Large Language Models

HPC-Coder: Modeling Parallel Programs using Large Language Models

Daniel Nichols, Aniruddha Marathe, Harshitha Menon, Todd Gamblin, Abhinav Bhatele

YC

0

Reddit

0

Parallel programs in high performance computing (HPC) continue to grow in complexity and scale in the exascale era. The diversity in hardware and parallel programming models make developing, optimizing, and maintaining parallel software even more burdensome for developers. One way to alleviate some of these burdens is with automated development and analysis tools. Such tools can perform complex and/or remedial tasks for developers that increase their productivity and decrease the chance for error. Until recently, such tools for code development and performance analysis have been limited in the complexity of tasks they can perform, especially for parallel programs. However, with recent advancements in language modeling, and the availability of large amounts of open-source code related data, these tools have started to utilize predictive language models to automate more complex tasks. In this paper, we show how large language models (LLMs) can be applied to tasks specific to high performance and scientific codes. We introduce a new dataset of HPC and scientific codes and use it to fine-tune several pre-trained models. We compare several pre-trained LLMs on HPC-related tasks and introduce a new model, HPC-Coder, fine-tuned on parallel codes. In our experiments, we show that this model can auto-complete HPC functions where generic models cannot, decorate for loops with OpenMP pragmas, and model performance changes in scientific application repositories as well as programming competition solutions.

Read more

5/15/2024

💬

Can Large Language Models Write Parallel Code?

Daniel Nichols, Joshua H. Davis, Zhaojun Xie, Arjun Rajaram, Abhinav Bhatele

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models are increasingly becoming a popular tool for software development. Their ability to model and generate source code has been demonstrated in a variety of contexts, including code completion, summarization, translation, and lookup. However, they often struggle to generate code for complex programs. In this paper, we study the capabilities of state-of-the-art language models to generate parallel code. In order to evaluate language models, we create a benchmark, ParEval, consisting of prompts that represent 420 different coding tasks related to scientific and parallel computing. We use ParEval to evaluate the effectiveness of several state-of-the-art open- and closed-source language models on these tasks. We introduce novel metrics for evaluating the performance of generated code, and use them to explore how well each large language model performs for 12 different computational problem types and six different parallel programming models.

Read more

5/15/2024