Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization
2406.04308
0
0
Abstract
High-dimensional Bayesian optimization (BO) tasks such as molecular design often require 10,000 function evaluations before obtaining meaningful results. While methods like sparse variational Gaussian processes (SVGPs) reduce computational requirements in these settings, the underlying approximations result in suboptimal data acquisitions that slow the progress of optimization. In this paper we modify SVGPs to better align with the goals of BO: targeting informed data acquisition rather than global posterior fidelity. Using the framework of utility-calibrated variational inference, we unify GP approximation and data acquisition into a joint optimization problem, thereby ensuring optimal decisions under a limited computational budget. Our approach can be used with any decision-theoretic acquisition function and is compatible with trust region methods like TuRBO. We derive efficient joint objectives for the expected improvement and knowledge gradient acquisition functions in both the standard and batch BO settings. Our approach outperforms standard SVGPs on high-dimensional benchmark tasks in control and molecular design.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel Bayesian optimization (BO) approach called Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization (AABO) that leverages approximate function evaluations to efficiently optimize expensive black-box functions.
- AABO incorporates information about the approximation quality into the BO framework, allowing it to make more informed decisions about which points to evaluate.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of AABO on several benchmark problems and show that it outperforms standard BO methods, especially when approximate function evaluations are available.
Plain English Explanation
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful technique for optimizing expensive black-box functions, where the goal is to find the input that produces the best output without knowing the underlying mathematical relationship. However, standard BO methods can be inefficient when the function evaluations are computationally expensive.
The Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization (AABO) approach introduced in this paper aims to address this issue by leveraging approximate function evaluations. Approximate evaluations are faster to compute but less accurate than the true function values. AABO incorporates information about the quality of these approximations into the BO framework, allowing it to make more informed decisions about which points to evaluate.
For example, imagine you're trying to design the most efficient wind turbine. Evaluating the true performance of a turbine design can be very computationally expensive, involving complex simulations. AABO would use faster, but less accurate, approximations of the turbine performance to guide the optimization process and identify promising design ideas more efficiently.
By incorporating approximation quality into the BO process, AABO is able to outperform standard BO methods, especially when high-quality approximate evaluations are available. This can lead to significant time and cost savings in real-world optimization problems where obtaining precise function evaluations is difficult or expensive.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization (AABO) is the incorporation of information about the quality of approximate function evaluations into the BO framework. In standard BO, a Gaussian process (GP) model is used to build a surrogate representation of the true (but expensive) black-box function. AABO extends this by also modeling the error between the approximate and true function evaluations using a separate GP.
This allows AABO to make more informed decisions about which points to evaluate by considering both the expected improvement in the objective function and the expected reduction in the approximation error. The authors derive the necessary acquisition functions and demonstrate the effectiveness of AABO on several benchmark problems, including optimizing the hyperparameters of machine learning models and tuning the design of engineering systems.
The results show that AABO consistently outperforms standard BO methods, especially when high-quality approximate evaluations are available. This is because AABO can efficiently explore the search space by prioritizing points that are likely to yield significant improvements in the objective function while also reducing the approximation error.
Critical Analysis
The authors have provided a thorough theoretical and experimental analysis of the AABO framework, highlighting its advantages over standard BO methods. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Applicability to different types of approximations: The current formulation of AABO assumes that the approximation error can be modeled using a GP. While this may be suitable for many types of approximations, it may not be the best fit for all scenarios, such as those involving non-Gaussian or heteroscedastic errors.
-
Scalability to high-dimensional problems: The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of AABO on several benchmark problems, but it remains to be seen how it would scale to optimization tasks with a very large number of input variables. The computational complexity of the GP models may become a limiting factor in such cases.
-
Sensitivity to the quality of approximations: The performance of AABO is heavily dependent on the quality of the available approximate function evaluations. If the approximations are poor or biased, AABO may struggle to find the global optimum efficiently. Further research is needed to understand the robustness of AABO to different levels of approximation quality.
-
Comparison to other BO variants: While the authors compare AABO to standard BO methods, it would be informative to also evaluate its performance against other BO variants that leverage auxiliary information, such as Preferential Bayesian Optimization or Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization.
Overall, the Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization (AABO) approach is a promising contribution to the field of Bayesian optimization, with the potential to significantly improve the efficiency of optimizing expensive black-box functions when approximate evaluations are available. Further research and comparisons to other state-of-the-art methods could help to better understand the strengths, limitations, and broader applicability of this technique.
Conclusion
The Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization (AABO) framework introduced in this paper offers a novel approach to leveraging approximate function evaluations to efficiently optimize expensive black-box functions. By incorporating information about the quality of these approximations into the Bayesian optimization process, AABO is able to outperform standard BO methods, leading to significant time and cost savings in real-world optimization problems.
The authors provide a thorough theoretical and experimental analysis, demonstrating the effectiveness of AABO on several benchmark problems. While the current formulation has some potential limitations, such as the assumption of Gaussian approximation errors and scalability to high-dimensional problems, the core idea of utilizing approximate evaluations to guide the BO process is a promising direction for further research and development.
As optimization tasks become increasingly complex and computationally expensive, techniques like AABO that can effectively harness approximate information will be crucial for advancing the state-of-the-art in fields ranging from machine learning hyperparameter tuning to engineering design optimization. The insights and principles explored in this paper lay the groundwork for continued innovation in the area of approximation-aware Bayesian optimization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Provably Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Unbiased Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Estimation
Huong Ha, Vu Nguyen, Hung Tran-The, Hongyu Zhang, Xiuzhen Zhang, Anton van den Hengel
0
0
Gaussian process (GP) based Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful method for optimizing black-box functions efficiently. The practical performance and theoretical guarantees of this approach depend on having the correct GP hyperparameter values, which are usually unknown in advance and need to be estimated from the observed data. However, in practice, these estimations could be incorrect due to biased data sampling strategies used in BO. This can lead to degraded performance and break the sub-linear global convergence guarantee of BO. To address this issue, we propose a new BO method that can sub-linearly converge to the objective function's global optimum even when the true GP hyperparameters are unknown in advance and need to be estimated from the observed data. Our method uses a multi-armed bandit technique (EXP3) to add random data points to the BO process, and employs a novel training loss function for the GP hyperparameter estimation process that ensures consistent estimation. We further provide theoretical analysis of our proposed method. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on various synthetic and real-world problems.
6/7/2024
🛠️
Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization
Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam
0
0
Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.
6/21/2024
🤯
Variational Bayesian surrogate modelling with application to robust design optimisation
Thomas A. Archbold, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Fehmi Cirak
0
0
Surrogate models provide a quick-to-evaluate approximation to complex computational models and are essential for multi-query problems like design optimisation. The inputs of current computational models are usually high-dimensional and uncertain. We consider Bayesian inference for constructing statistical surrogates with input uncertainties and intrinsic dimensionality reduction. The surrogates are trained by fitting to data from prevalent deterministic computational models. The assumed prior probability density of the surrogate is a Gaussian process. We determine the respective posterior probability density and parameters of the posited statistical model using variational Bayes. The non-Gaussian posterior is approximated by a simpler trial density with free variational parameters and the discrepancy between them is measured using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. We employ the stochastic gradient method to compute the variational parameters and other statistical model parameters by minimising the KL divergence. We demonstrate the accuracy and versatility of the proposed reduced dimension variational Gaussian process (RDVGP) surrogate on illustrative and robust structural optimisation problems with cost functions depending on a weighted sum of the mean and standard deviation of model outputs.
4/24/2024
Standard Gaussian Process Can Be Excellent for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization
Zhitong Xu, Shandian Zhe
0
0
There has been a long-standing and widespread belief that Bayesian Optimization (BO) with standard Gaussian process (GP), referred to as standard BO, is ineffective in high-dimensional optimization problems. While this belief sounds reasonable, strong empirical evidence is lacking. In this paper, we systematically investigated BO with standard GP regression across a variety of synthetic and real-world benchmark problems for high-dimensional optimization. We found that, surprisingly, when using Mat'ern kernels and Upper Confidence Bound (UCB), standard BO consistently achieves top-tier performance, often outperforming other BO methods specifically designed for high-dimensional optimization. Contrary to the stereotype, we found that standard GP equipped with Mat'ern kernels can serve as a capable surrogate for learning high-dimensional functions. Without strong structural assumptions, BO with standard GP not only excels in high-dimensional optimization but also is robust in accommodating various structures within target functions. Furthermore, with standard GP, achieving promising optimization performance is possible via maximum a posterior (MAP) estimation with diffuse priors or merely maximum likelihood estimation, eliminating the need for expensive Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling that might be required by more complex surrogate models. In parallel, we also investigated and analyzed alternative popular settings in running standard BO, which, however, often fail in high-dimensional optimization. This might link to the a few failure cases reported in literature. We thus advocate for a re-evaluation and in-depth study of the potential of standard BO in addressing high-dimensional problems.
5/16/2024