Archimedes-AUEB at SemEval-2024 Task 5: LLM explains Civil Procedure

Read original: arXiv:2405.08502 - Published 5/15/2024 by Odysseas S. Chlapanis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Dimitrios Galanis

🤯

Overview

This paper describes the Archimedes-AUEB team's submission to the SemEval-2024 Task 5, which focuses on having large language models (LLMs) explain legal concepts related to civil procedure.
The goal is to develop LLMs that can effectively communicate complex legal information to non-expert audiences in plain, easy-to-understand language.
The authors explore various approaches to achieving this, including training the LLMs on relevant legal corpora and incorporating techniques for generating more explainable outputs.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers from Archimedes-AUEB university participated in a competition called SemEval-2024 Task 5. The goal of this task was to create AI language models that can take complex legal information about civil court procedures and explain it in simple, understandable terms for regular people.

This is an important challenge because the legal system can be confusing and inaccessible to many citizens. By developing AI assistants that can translate legalese into plain language, the researchers hope to improve public understanding and engagement with the justice system.

The Archimedes-AUEB team tested different methods for training their AI models, such as exposing them to large legal text databases. They also experimented with techniques that could make the AI's explanations more clear and easy to follow. The goal was to create AI assistants that can take complex legal concepts and break them down in a way that is meaningful and accessible for non-experts.

Technical Explanation

The Archimedes-AUEB team participated in the SemEval-2024 Task 5, which aimed to develop large language models (LLMs) capable of explaining legal concepts related to civil procedure in plain, easy-to-understand language.

To address this challenge, the researchers explored various approaches, including:

Training Data: The team experimented with exposing their LLMs to relevant legal corpora, such as case law and legal textbooks, to imbue the models with a stronger grounding in civil procedure.
Explainable AI Techniques: The researchers incorporated methods for making the LLMs' outputs more interpretable and explainable, such as incorporating techniques from the Argumentative Large Language Models and IITK at SemEval-2024 Task 2 projects.
Evaluation: The team evaluated their models' performance using both automatic metrics and human assessments, drawing on lessons from projects like Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities and the LLM Reasoners library.

By combining specialized training data, explainable AI techniques, and rigorous evaluation, the Archimedes-AUEB team aimed to develop LLMs that could effectively bridge the gap between legal complexity and public understanding.

Critical Analysis

The Archimedes-AUEB team's approach to the SemEval-2024 Task 5 represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing effort to make legal information more accessible to non-expert audiences. However, the paper does not delve into the specific challenges or limitations encountered in their research.

For example, it would be interesting to know how the team addressed potential biases or inconsistencies in the legal corpora used for training, and whether they observed any tradeoffs between model performance and the interpretability of the generated explanations. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential long-term implications or societal impact of deploying such AI-powered legal assistants.

While the researchers have demonstrated promising progress, further research is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of this approach. Ongoing critical analysis and engagement with the broader AI ethics and legal communities will be essential to ensuring that these technologies are developed and deployed in a responsible and equitable manner.

Conclusion

The Archimedes-AUEB team's work on the SemEval-2024 Task 5 represents an important step towards bridging the gap between the complexities of the legal system and the needs of the general public. By developing large language models that can effectively explain civil procedure in plain, accessible language, the researchers aim to improve citizen engagement with and understanding of the justice system.

The team's exploration of specialized training data, explainable AI techniques, and rigorous evaluation methods offers valuable insights for the broader field of AI-powered legal assistance. As these technologies continue to evolve, it will be crucial to address potential limitations and ethical considerations to ensure that they truly empower and benefit all members of society.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Archimedes-AUEB at SemEval-2024 Task 5: LLM explains Civil Procedure

Odysseas S. Chlapanis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Dimitrios Galanis

The SemEval task on Argument Reasoning in Civil Procedure is challenging in that it requires understanding legal concepts and inferring complex arguments. Currently, most Large Language Models (LLM) excelling in the legal realm are principally purposed for classification tasks, hence their reasoning rationale is subject to contention. The approach we advocate involves using a powerful teacher-LLM (ChatGPT) to extend the training dataset with explanations and generate synthetic data. The resulting data are then leveraged to fine-tune a small student-LLM. Contrary to previous work, our explanations are not directly derived from the teacher's internal knowledge. Instead they are grounded in authentic human analyses, therefore delivering a superior reasoning signal. Additionally, a new `mutation' method generates artificial data instances inspired from existing ones. We are publicly releasing the explanations as an extension to the original dataset, along with the synthetic dataset and the prompts that were used to generate both. Our system ranked 15th in the SemEval competition. It outperforms its own teacher and can produce explanations aligned with the original human analyses, as verified by legal experts.

5/15/2024

eagerlearners at SemEval2024 Task 5: The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure

Hoorieh Sabzevari, Mohammadmostafa Rostamkhani, Sauleh Eetemadi

This study investigates the performance of the zero-shot method in classifying data using three large language models, alongside two models with large input token sizes and the two pre-trained models on legal data. Our main dataset comes from the domain of U.S. civil procedure. It includes summaries of legal cases, specific questions, potential answers, and detailed explanations for why each solution is relevant, all sourced from a book aimed at law students. By comparing different methods, we aimed to understand how effectively they handle the complexities found in legal datasets. Our findings show how well the zero-shot method of large language models can understand complicated data. We achieved our highest F1 score of 64% in these experiments.

6/26/2024

Team UTSA-NLP at SemEval 2024 Task 5: Prompt Ensembling for Argument Reasoning in Civil Procedures with GPT4

Dan Schumacher, Anthony Rios

In this paper, we present our system for the SemEval Task 5, The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure Challenge. Legal argument reasoning is an essential skill that all law students must master. Moreover, it is important to develop natural language processing solutions that can reason about a question given terse domain-specific contextual information. Our system explores a prompt-based solution using GPT4 to reason over legal arguments. We also evaluate an ensemble of prompting strategies, including chain-of-thought reasoning and in-context learning. Overall, our system results in a Macro F1 of .8095 on the validation dataset and .7315 (5th out of 21 teams) on the final test set. Code for this project is available at https://github.com/danschumac1/CivilPromptReasoningGPT4.

4/3/2024

💬

Argumentative Large Language Models for Explainable and Contestable Decision-Making

Gabriel Freedman, Adam Dejl, Deniz Gorur, Xiang Yin, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni

The diversity of knowledge encoded in large language models (LLMs) and their ability to apply this knowledge zero-shot in a range of settings makes them a promising candidate for use in decision-making. However, they are currently limited by their inability to reliably provide outputs which are explainable and contestable. In this paper, we attempt to reconcile these strengths and weaknesses by introducing a method for supplementing LLMs with argumentative reasoning. Concretely, we introduce argumentative LLMs, a method utilising LLMs to construct argumentation frameworks, which then serve as the basis for formal reasoning in decision-making. The interpretable nature of these argumentation frameworks and formal reasoning means that any decision made by the supplemented LLM may be naturally explained to, and contested by, humans. We demonstrate the effectiveness of argumentative LLMs experimentally in the decision-making task of claim verification. We obtain results that are competitive with, and in some cases surpass, comparable state-of-the-art techniques.

5/6/2024