Areas of Improvement for Autonomous Vehicles: A Machine Learning Analysis of Disengagement Reports

Read original: arXiv:2408.00051 - Published 8/2/2024 by Tyler Ward
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The California Department of Motor Vehicles (CDMV) has been collecting data on disengagements of autonomous vehicles (AVs) from autonomous mode since 2014.
  • This paper analyzes the 2023 disengagement reports (DRs) using machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques.
  • The goal is to extract insights from the reports and identify areas for improvement in AV technology.

Plain English Explanation

The CDMV requires manufacturers of autonomous vehicles to report when their self-driving cars disengage from autonomous mode during testing. These disengagement reports (DRs) provide information on whether the disengagement was due to a technology failure, a human taking over, or other factors.

The researchers in this paper used machine learning and natural language processing techniques to analyze the 2023 DRs. They extracted important information from the descriptions of the disengagements and then used a clustering algorithm to group similar reports together. By looking at the frequency of each cluster, they were able to identify the main causes of disengagements.

The paper also discusses findings from previous years' DRs and provides the researchers' own analysis on how to improve autonomous vehicle technology based on the insights gained from this year's data.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used a natural language processing (NLP) approach to extract relevant information from the textual descriptions of disengagements in the 2023 DRs. They then applied the k-Means clustering algorithm to group the report entries based on the extracted features.

By analyzing the frequency of each cluster, the researchers were able to determine the primary factors that led to disengagements, such as technology failures, manual overrides, or other issues. The researchers then manually categorized each cluster to provide a more detailed understanding of the disengagement causes.

The paper also compares the findings from this year's analysis to insights gained from previous years' DRs, providing a longitudinal perspective on the development of AV technology and areas that still need improvement.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the 2023 disengagement reports, leveraging machine learning and NLP techniques to extract valuable insights. However, the researchers acknowledge that the analysis is limited to the information provided in the DRs, which may not capture the full context and complexity of each disengagement scenario.

Additionally, the manual categorization of the clusters introduces a degree of subjectivity, and the researchers do not provide detailed information on the specific criteria used for this categorization. Further research could explore more objective, data-driven methods for classifying the disengagement factors.

Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the current state of autonomous vehicle technology and identifies areas that require continued improvement and development, such as reducing voluntary disengagements and enhancing situational awareness in autonomous driving systems.

Conclusion

The analysis of the 2023 disengagement reports by the researchers offers valuable insights into the performance and limitations of current autonomous vehicle technology. By leveraging machine learning and natural language processing techniques, the researchers were able to identify the primary factors contributing to disengagements from autonomous mode, providing a roadmap for manufacturers and policymakers to address these challenges and drive further advancements in AV safety and reliability.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

Areas of Improvement for Autonomous Vehicles: A Machine Learning Analysis of Disengagement Reports

Tyler Ward

Since 2014, the California Department of Motor Vehicles (CDMV) has compiled information from manufacturers of autonomous vehicles (AVs) regarding factors that lead to the disengagement from autonomous driving mode in these vehicles. These disengagement reports (DRs) contain information detailing whether the AV disengaged from autonomous mode due to technology failure, manual override, or other factors during driving tests. This paper presents a machine learning (ML) based analysis of the information from the 2023 DRs. We use a natural language processing (NLP) approach to extract important information from the description of a disengagement, and use the k-Means clustering algorithm to group report entries together. The cluster frequency is then analyzed, and each cluster is manually categorized based on the factors leading to disengagement. We discuss findings from previous years' DRs, and provide our own analysis to identify areas of improvement for AVs.

Read more

8/2/2024

Human-Machine Interaction in Automated Vehicles: Reducing Voluntary Driver Intervention
Total Score

0

Human-Machine Interaction in Automated Vehicles: Reducing Voluntary Driver Intervention

Xinzhi Zhong, Yang Zhou, Varshini Kamaraj, Zhenhao Zhou, Wissam Kontar, Dan Negrut, John D. Lee, Soyoung Ahn

This paper develops a novel car-following control method to reduce voluntary driver interventions and improve traffic stability in Automated Vehicles (AVs). Through a combination of experimental and empirical analysis, we show how voluntary driver interventions can instigate substantial traffic disturbances that are amplified along the traffic upstream. Motivated by these findings, we present a framework for driver intervention based on evidence accumulation (EA), which describes the evolution of the driver's distrust in automation, ultimately resulting in intervention. Informed through the EA framework, we propose a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based car-following control for AVs that is strategically designed to mitigate unnecessary driver intervention and improve traffic stability. Numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control model.

Read more

4/10/2024

Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
Total Score

0

Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning

Robert Kaufman, Emi Lee, Manas Satish Bedmutha, David Kirsh, Nadir Weibel

Low trust remains a significant barrier to Autonomous Vehicle (AV) adoption. To design trustworthy AVs, we need to better understand the individual traits, attitudes, and experiences that impact people's trust judgements. We use machine learning to understand the most important factors that contribute to young adult trust based on a comprehensive set of personal factors gathered via survey (n = 1457). Factors ranged from psychosocial and cognitive attributes to driving style, experiences, and perceived AV risks and benefits. Using the explainable AI technique SHAP, we found that perceptions of AV risks and benefits, attitudes toward feasibility and usability, institutional trust, prior experience, and a person's mental model are the most important predictors. Surprisingly, psychosocial and many technology- and driving-specific factors were not strong predictors. Results highlight the importance of individual differences for designing trustworthy AVs for diverse groups and lead to key implications for future design and research.

Read more

9/16/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Propensity towards Ownership and Use of Automated Vehicles: Who Are the Adopters? Who Are the Non-adopters? Who Is Hesitant?

Tho Le, Giovanni Circella

The objective of this study is to investigate automated vehicle (AV) adoption perceptions, including ownership intentions and the willingness to use self-driving mobility services. In this paper, we use data from the 2018 California Transportation Survey, and use K-means, a clustering technique in data mining, to reveal patterns of potential AV owners (and non-owners) as well as AV users (and non-users) of self-driving services. The results reveal seven clusters, namely Multitaskers/ environmentalists/ impaired drivers, Tech mavens/ travelers, Life in transition, Captive car-users, Public/ active transport users, Sub-urban Dwellers, and Car enthusiasts. The first two clusters include adopters who are largely familiar with AVs, are tech savvy, and who make good use of time during their commute. The last cluster comprise of non-adopters who are car enthusiasts. On the other hand, people who are Life in transition, Captive car-users, Public/ active transport users, and Sub-urban dwellers show uncertain perceptions towards being AV adopters. They are either pursuing higher education, having a busy schedule, supporting for sustainable society via government policies, or have a stable life, respectively. Insights from this study help practitioners to build business models and strategic planning, addressing potential market segments of individuals that are willing to own an AV vs. those that are more inclined to use self-driving mobility services. The gray segments identify a latent untapped demand and a potential target for marketing, campaigns, and sales.

Read more

7/18/2024