Argument-Aware Approach To Event Linking

Read original: arXiv:2403.15097 - Published 6/7/2024 by I-Hung Hsu, Zihan Xue, Nilay Pochh, Sahil Bansal, Premkumar Natarajan, Jayanth Srinivasa, Nanyun Peng
Total Score

0

Argument-Aware Approach To Event Linking

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Argument-Aware Approach To Event Linking
Total Score

0

Argument-Aware Approach To Event Linking

I-Hung Hsu, Zihan Xue, Nilay Pochh, Sahil Bansal, Premkumar Natarajan, Jayanth Srinivasa, Nanyun Peng

Event linking connects event mentions in text with relevant nodes in a knowledge base (KB). Prior research in event linking has mainly borrowed methods from entity linking, overlooking the distinct features of events. Compared to the extensively explored entity linking task, events have more complex structures and can be more effectively distinguished by examining their associated arguments. Moreover, the information-rich nature of events leads to the scarcity of event KBs. This emphasizes the need for event linking models to identify and classify event mentions not in the KB as ``out-of-KB,'' an area that has received limited attention. In this work, we tackle these challenges by introducing an argument-aware approach. First, we improve event linking models by augmenting input text with tagged event argument information, facilitating the recognition of key information about event mentions. Subsequently, to help the model handle ``out-of-KB'' scenarios, we synthesize out-of-KB training examples from in-KB instances through controlled manipulation of event arguments. Our experiment across two test datasets showed significant enhancements in both in-KB and out-of-KB scenarios, with a notable 22% improvement in out-of-KB evaluations.

Read more

6/7/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Asking and Answering Questions to Extract Event-Argument Structures

Md Nayem Uddin, Enfa Rose George, Eduardo Blanco, Steven Corman

This paper presents a question-answering approach to extract document-level event-argument structures. We automatically ask and answer questions for each argument type an event may have. Questions are generated using manually defined templates and generative transformers. Template-based questions are generated using predefined role-specific wh-words and event triggers from the context document. Transformer-based questions are generated using large language models trained to formulate questions based on a passage and the expected answer. Additionally, we develop novel data augmentation strategies specialized in inter-sentential event-argument relations. We use a simple span-swapping technique, coreference resolution, and large language models to augment the training instances. Our approach enables transfer learning without any corpora-specific modifications and yields competitive results with the RAMS dataset. It outperforms previous work, and it is especially beneficial to extract arguments that appear in different sentences than the event trigger. We also present detailed quantitative and qualitative analyses shedding light on the most common errors made by our best model.

Read more

4/26/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Utilizing Contextual Clues and Role Correlations for Enhancing Document-level Event Argument Extraction

Wanlong Liu, Dingyi Zeng, Li Zhou, Yichen Xiao, Weishan Kong, Malu Zhang, Shaohuan Cheng, Hongyang Zhao, Wenyu Chen

Document-level event argument extraction is a crucial yet challenging task within the field of information extraction. Current mainstream approaches primarily focus on the information interaction between event triggers and their arguments, facing two limitations: insufficient context interaction and the ignorance of event correlations. Here, we introduce a novel framework named CARLG (Contextual Aggregation of clues and Role-based Latent Guidance), comprising two innovative components: the Contextual Clues Aggregation (CCA) and the Role-based Latent Information Guidance (RLIG). The CCA module leverages the attention weights derived from a pre-trained encoder to adaptively assimilates broader contextual information, while the RLIG module aims to capture the semantic correlations among event roles. We then instantiate the CARLG framework into two variants based on two types of current mainstream EAE approaches. Notably, our CARLG framework introduces less than 1% new parameters yet significantly improving the performance. Comprehensive experiments across the RAMS, WikiEvents, and MLEE datasets confirm the superiority of CARLG, showing significant superiority in terms of both performance and inference speed compared to major benchmarks. Further analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed modules.

Read more

4/4/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

MAVEN-Arg: Completing the Puzzle of All-in-One Event Understanding Dataset with Event Argument Annotation

Xiaozhi Wang, Hao Peng, Yong Guan, Kaisheng Zeng, Jianhui Chen, Lei Hou, Xu Han, Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Ruobing Xie, Jie Zhou, Juanzi Li

Understanding events in texts is a core objective of natural language understanding, which requires detecting event occurrences, extracting event arguments, and analyzing inter-event relationships. However, due to the annotation challenges brought by task complexity, a large-scale dataset covering the full process of event understanding has long been absent. In this paper, we introduce MAVEN-Arg, which augments MAVEN datasets with event argument annotations, making the first all-in-one dataset supporting event detection, event argument extraction (EAE), and event relation extraction. As an EAE benchmark, MAVEN-Arg offers three main advantages: (1) a comprehensive schema covering 162 event types and 612 argument roles, all with expert-written definitions and examples; (2) a large data scale, containing 98,591 events and 290,613 arguments obtained with laborious human annotation; (3) the exhaustive annotation supporting all task variants of EAE, which annotates both entity and non-entity event arguments in document level. Experiments indicate that MAVEN-Arg is quite challenging for both fine-tuned EAE models and proprietary large language models (LLMs). Furthermore, to demonstrate the benefits of an all-in-one dataset, we preliminarily explore a potential application, future event prediction, with LLMs. MAVEN-Arg and codes can be obtained from https://github.com/THU-KEG/MAVEN-Argument.

Read more

6/21/2024