Asking and Answering Questions to Extract Event-Argument Structures

Overview

• This paper presents a question-answering approach to extract document-level event-argument structures.
• The approach automatically generates and answers questions for each argument type of an event, using both predefined templates and large language models.
• The paper also introduces novel data augmentation strategies to improve extraction of inter-sentential event-argument relations.
• The proposed method enables transfer learning without corpus-specific modifications and achieves competitive results on the RAMS dataset, particularly in extracting arguments that appear in different sentences than the event trigger.
• The paper provides detailed analyses of the most common errors made by the best-performing model.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a question-answering approach to extract document-level event-argument structures. This means they've created a system that can automatically ask and answer questions to identify the different pieces of information (arguments) associated with events described in a document.

The system uses two main approaches to generate questions:

1. Predefined templates that use specific question words and event triggers from the document.
2. Large language models trained to formulate questions based on a passage and the expected answer.

The researchers also developed new techniques to augment the training data by swapping spans of text, using coreference resolution, and leveraging large language models. This helps the system learn to better identify event-argument relationships, especially when the arguments are spread across different sentences.

The resulting system can be applied to new datasets without needing to be heavily modified, and it outperforms previous work, particularly in extracting arguments that appear in different sentences than the event trigger. The paper also includes detailed analyses of the common errors made by the best-performing model.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a question-answering approach to extract document-level event-argument structures. The key steps are:

1. Automatically generate questions for each argument type (e.g., who, what, when, where) associated with an event in the document.
2. Use the questions to extract the corresponding argument spans from the document.

The question generation process uses two methods:

• Template-based questions are generated using predefined role-specific wh-words and event triggers from the context document.
• Transformer-based questions are generated using large language models trained to formulate questions based on a passage and the expected answer.

To improve the model's ability to handle inter-sentential event-argument relations, the researchers develop novel data augmentation strategies. These include a span-swapping technique, coreference resolution, and leveraging large language models.

The resulting system is evaluated on the RAMS dataset and outperforms previous work, especially in extracting arguments that appear in different sentences than the event trigger. The paper also presents detailed quantitative and qualitative analyses of the most common errors made by the best-performing model.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to document-level event-argument extraction. The use of question-answering and data augmentation techniques is a compelling solution to the challenge of identifying event-argument relationships that span multiple sentences.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the performance of the system may be sensitive to the quality and coverage of the predefined question templates, and the reliance on large language models could make the system computationally expensive or difficult to deploy in certain scenarios.

Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on a single dataset (RAMS). It would be valuable to see how the system performs on a broader range of event-argument extraction tasks and datasets, including those focused on argumentative writing, to better understand its generalizability.

Overall, the research presents a compelling advance in event-argument extraction, but further work is needed to fully assess the approach's strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel question-answering approach to document-level event-argument extraction that leverages both predefined templates and large language models to generate and answer questions. The researchers also develop specialized data augmentation strategies to improve the system's ability to handle inter-sentential event-argument relations.

The proposed method achieves competitive results on the RAMS dataset, particularly in extracting arguments that appear in different sentences than the event trigger. The detailed analyses provided in the paper offer valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of the approach, paving the way for future refinements and extensions.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in event-argument extraction, with the potential to enhance our understanding of complex document-level event structures and inform a wide range of natural language processing applications.