Utilizing Contextual Clues and Role Correlations for Enhancing Document-level Event Argument Extraction

Overview

• Document-level event argument extraction is a challenging task in information extraction.
• Current approaches focus on the interaction between event triggers and their arguments, but face limitations in context interaction and event correlation.
• The paper introduces a novel framework called CARLG, which comprises two innovative components: Contextual Clues Aggregation (CCA) and Role-based Latent Information Guidance (RLIG).

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the problem of extracting information about events from text documents. When an event occurs, such as a company acquiring another company, there are typically several key pieces of information associated with that event, like the company names, the date, and the type of event. Extracting this information accurately is important for tasks like summarizing news articles or building knowledge bases.

However, current methods for doing this have two main limitations. First, they don't make full use of the context around the event, such as other information in the same document that could provide helpful clues. Second, they don't account for the relationships between the different pieces of information (like the roles of the different entities involved).

The new CARLG framework introduced in this paper aims to address these limitations. It has two key components:

1. Contextual Clues Aggregation (CCA): This part looks at the broader context around the event and uses an attention mechanism to bring in relevant information from elsewhere in the document.

2. Role-based Latent Information Guidance (RLIG): This part models the relationships between the different roles involved in the event, like the buyer, seller, date, etc. This helps the system understand how the pieces fit together.

The paper shows that adding these two components to existing event extraction models leads to significant improvements in performance, without adding much complexity to the overall system.

Technical Explanation

The CARLG framework consists of two main components:

1. Contextual Clues Aggregation (CCA): This module leverages the attention weights from a pre-trained encoder to adaptively incorporate relevant contextual information from the broader document. It allows the model to selectively focus on and aggregate the most pertinent contextual clues to improve event argument extraction.

2. Role-based Latent Information Guidance (RLIG): This module aims to capture the semantic correlations among the different event roles (e.g. buyer, seller, date). It introduces latent variables to model these role-based dependencies, guiding the extraction of event arguments.

The authors then instantiate the CARLG framework into two variants, building on top of two existing mainstream event argument extraction approaches. Notably, the CARLG framework adds less than 1% new parameters to the base models, yet significantly improves performance.

The paper evaluates the CARLG framework on three benchmark datasets for event argument extraction - RAMS, WikiEvents, and MLEE. The results show that CARLG outperforms strong baselines in both performance and inference speed. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the CCA and RLIG modules.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the CARLG framework and its two innovative components. The idea of explicitly modeling the relationships between event roles is particularly insightful, as prior approaches have largely ignored these semantic correlations.

That said, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the CARLG approach. For example, it's unclear how well the framework would generalize to domains or event types not covered by the evaluation datasets. The reliance on a pre-trained encoder model could also be a point of concern, as the performance may be sensitive to the choice of encoder.

Additionally, while the paper reports significant performance improvements, it would be helpful to understand the practical implications of these gains. For instance, how would the improved accuracy and speed translate to real-world applications like news summarization or knowledge base construction?

Overall, the CARLG framework represents a promising advance in event argument extraction, but further research is needed to fully characterize its strengths, weaknesses, and potential use cases.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework called CARLG for document-level event argument extraction. The key innovations are the Contextual Clues Aggregation (CCA) module, which leverages broader contextual information, and the Role-based Latent Information Guidance (RLIG) module, which models the semantic relationships between event roles.

Experiments show that CARLG significantly outperforms strong baselines in terms of both performance and inference speed, while adding less than 1% new parameters to the base models. This suggests the framework offers an effective and efficient approach to this important information extraction task.

Overall, the CARLG framework represents an important advance that could have wide-ranging applications in areas like news summarization, knowledge base construction, and beyond. While further research is needed, this work demonstrates the value of explicitly modeling contextual cues and role-based dependencies in event extraction.