ART: Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image Models to Protect Benign Users
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces ART, a system for automatically generating adversarial examples to test the robustness of text-to-image models.
- The goal is to identify and mitigate potential harms that these models could cause to benign users.
- ART uses a "red-teaming" approach, where it attempts to find vulnerabilities in the models by generating adversarial inputs that can cause unintended or harmful outputs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a system called ART that is designed to automatically find ways to trick text-to-image AI models into producing unintended or harmful outputs. The researchers wanted to develop a way to proactively test these models and identify potential issues before they can cause problems for regular users.
The key idea behind ART is to use a "red-teaming" approach, which means intentionally trying to find vulnerabilities in the system. ART generates adversarial examples - inputs that are specifically crafted to fool the AI model and make it output something different than what a normal user would expect. By testing the models with these adversarial examples, the researchers can uncover weaknesses and work on fixing them to protect benign users.
This research is important because as text-to-image AI models become more advanced and widely used, it's crucial to understand their limitations and potential failure modes. If these models are not properly tested and secured, they could be exploited to generate harmful or abusive content, which could negatively impact regular users. The ART system provides a way to proactively identify and address these issues.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the ART (Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image) system, which uses a red-teaming approach to uncover vulnerabilities in text-to-image AI models. Red-teaming involves intentionally trying to find weaknesses in a system, often by generating adversarial examples - inputs that are designed to fool the model and produce unintended outputs.
The ART system works by first training a language model to generate prompts that are likely to trigger undesirable outputs from the target text-to-image model. It then uses an optimization-based approach to iteratively refine these prompts, making them more effective at causing the model to produce harmful or abusive content. The researchers evaluate ART on several commercially available text-to-image models, and find that it is able to reliably generate adversarial examples that significantly degrade the models' performance.
The key technical insights from the paper include:
- The use of a red-teaming approach to proactively identify vulnerabilities in text-to-image models
- The development of an optimization-based method for generating effective adversarial prompts
- The empirical evaluation of ART on multiple commercial text-to-image models, demonstrating its effectiveness
Critical Analysis
The ART system represents an important step forward in the effort to ensure the safety and robustness of text-to-image AI models. By proactively testing these models with adversarial examples, the researchers have identified several weaknesses that could potentially be exploited by bad actors to generate harmful content.
However, it's important to note that the ART system itself could also be misused to create adversarial examples for malicious purposes. The researchers acknowledge this risk and suggest that the system should be used responsibly by model developers and researchers to improve the security of their models, rather than by bad actors trying to cause harm.
Additionally, the ART system is limited to testing the models' responses to textual prompts, and does not consider other potential attack vectors, such as adversarial images or audio inputs. Further research is needed to develop comprehensive red-teaming tools that can test the full range of potential vulnerabilities in text-to-image AI systems.
Overall, the ART system represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI safety and security. By providing a systematic way to uncover and address vulnerabilities in text-to-image models, the researchers have laid the groundwork for developing more robust and trustworthy AI systems that can be safely deployed in a wide range of applications.
Conclusion
The ART system introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the effort to ensure the safety and robustness of text-to-image AI models. By using a red-teaming approach to proactively identify vulnerabilities, the researchers have developed a tool that can help model developers and researchers improve the security of their systems and protect benign users from potential harms.
While the ART system has limitations, and its own potential for misuse must be carefully considered, it represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI safety and security. As text-to-image models become more advanced and widely deployed, it will be crucial to have robust testing and mitigation strategies in place to address the risks they pose. The ART system provides a promising starting point for these efforts, and future research in this area could lead to even more comprehensive and effective security measures for AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ART: Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image Models to Protect Benign Users
Guanlin Li, Kangjie Chen, Shudong Zhang, Jie Zhang, Tianwei Zhang
Large-scale pre-trained generative models are taking the world by storm, due to their abilities in generating creative content. Meanwhile, safeguards for these generative models are developed, to protect users' rights and safety, most of which are designed for large language models. Existing methods primarily focus on jailbreak and adversarial attacks, which mainly evaluate the model's safety under malicious prompts. Recent work found that manually crafted safe prompts can unintentionally trigger unsafe generations. To further systematically evaluate the safety risks of text-to-image models, we propose a novel Automatic Red-Teaming framework, ART. Our method leverages both vision language model and large language model to establish a connection between unsafe generations and their prompts, thereby more efficiently identifying the model's vulnerabilities. With our comprehensive experiments, we reveal the toxicity of the popular open-source text-to-image models. The experiments also validate the effectiveness, adaptability, and great diversity of ART. Additionally, we introduce three large-scale red-teaming datasets for studying the safety risks associated with text-to-image models. Datasets and models can be found in https://github.com/GuanlinLee/ART.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation
Jessica Quaye, Alicia Parrish, Oana Inel, Charvi Rastogi, Hannah Rose Kirk, Minsuk Kahng, Erin van Liemt, Max Bartolo, Jess Tsang, Justin White, Nathan Clement, Rafael Mosquera, Juan Ciro, Vijay Janapa Reddi, Lora Aroyo
With the rise of text-to-image (T2I) generative AI models reaching wide audiences, it is critical to evaluate model robustness against non-obvious attacks to mitigate the generation of offensive images. By focusing on ``implicitly adversarial'' prompts (those that trigger T2I models to generate unsafe images for non-obvious reasons), we isolate a set of difficult safety issues that human creativity is well-suited to uncover. To this end, we built the Adversarial Nibbler Challenge, a red-teaming methodology for crowdsourcing a diverse set of implicitly adversarial prompts. We have assembled a suite of state-of-the-art T2I models, employed a simple user interface to identify and annotate harms, and engaged diverse populations to capture long-tail safety issues that may be overlooked in standard testing. The challenge is run in consecutive rounds to enable a sustained discovery and analysis of safety pitfalls in T2I models. In this paper, we present an in-depth account of our methodology, a systematic study of novel attack strategies and discussion of safety failures revealed by challenge participants. We also release a companion visualization tool for easy exploration and derivation of insights from the dataset. The first challenge round resulted in over 10k prompt-image pairs with machine annotations for safety. A subset of 1.5k samples contains rich human annotations of harm types and attack styles. We find that 14% of images that humans consider harmful are mislabeled as ``safe'' by machines. We have identified new attack strategies that highlight the complexity of ensuring T2I model robustness. Our findings emphasize the necessity of continual auditing and adaptation as new vulnerabilities emerge. We are confident that this work will enable proactive, iterative safety assessments and promote responsible development of T2I models.
Read more5/15/2024
🤿
0
DART: Deep Adversarial Automated Red Teaming for LLM Safety
Bojian Jiang, Yi Jing, Tianhao Shen, Qing Yang, Deyi Xiong
Manual Red teaming is a commonly-used method to identify vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs), which, is costly and unscalable. In contrast, automated red teaming uses a Red LLM to automatically generate adversarial prompts to the Target LLM, offering a scalable way for safety vulnerability detection. However, the difficulty of building a powerful automated Red LLM lies in the fact that the safety vulnerabilities of the Target LLM are dynamically changing with the evolution of the Target LLM. To mitigate this issue, we propose a Deep Adversarial Automated Red Teaming (DART) framework in which the Red LLM and Target LLM are deeply and dynamically interacting with each other in an iterative manner. In each iteration, in order to generate successful attacks as many as possible, the Red LLM not only takes into account the responses from the Target LLM, but also adversarially adjust its attacking directions by monitoring the global diversity of generated attacks across multiple iterations. Simultaneously, to explore dynamically changing safety vulnerabilities of the Target LLM, we allow the Target LLM to enhance its safety via an active learning based data selection mechanism. Experimential results demonstrate that DART significantly reduces the safety risk of the target LLM. For human evaluation on Anthropic Harmless dataset, compared to the instruction-tuning target LLM, DART eliminates the violation risks by 53.4%. We will release the datasets and codes of DART soon.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning
Seanie Lee, Minsu Kim, Lynn Cherif, David Dobre, Juho Lee, Sung Ju Hwang, Kenji Kawaguchi, Gauthier Gidel, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin, Moksh Jain
Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe and responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). Developing effective protection against many modes of attack prompts requires discovering diverse attacks. Automated red-teaming typically uses reinforcement learning to fine-tune an attacker language model to generate prompts that elicit undesirable responses from a target LLM, as measured, for example, by an auxiliary toxicity classifier. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. As a flexible and probabilistically principled alternative, we propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts. We find that the attacks generated by our method are effective against a wide range of target LLMs, both with and without safety tuning, and transfer well between target LLMs. Finally, we demonstrate that models safety-tuned using a dataset of red-teaming prompts generated by our method are robust to attacks from other RL-based red-teaming approaches.
Read more5/30/2024