Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation

Read original: arXiv:2403.12075 - Published 5/15/2024 by Jessica Quaye, Alicia Parrish, Oana Inel, Charvi Rastogi, Hannah Rose Kirk, Minsuk Kahng, Erin van Liemt, Max Bartolo, Jess Tsang, Justin White and 5 others
Total Score

0

Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel red-teaming method called "Adversarial Nibbler" for identifying diverse harms in text-to-image generation systems.
  • The method involves crowdsourcing a wide range of prompts from the public and evaluating the resulting images for potential harms.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Adversarial Nibbler by applying it to several state-of-the-art text-to-image models, uncovering a broad spectrum of safety and ethical issues.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to test the safety and ethical behavior of AI systems that can generate images from text. The method, called "Adversarial Nibbler," gets help from the public to come up with all kinds of text prompts - some of them potentially harmful or problematic. These prompts are then used to test the AI image generation models, and the resulting images are carefully examined for any issues, such as the generation of biased, unsafe, or unethical content.

The authors show that this crowdsourced red-teaming approach is effective at uncovering a wide range of potential harms in state-of-the-art text-to-image AI models. This is an important step in ensuring these powerful AI systems are developed and deployed responsibly, with proper safeguards in place to protect against misuse or unintended negative consequences.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel red-teaming method called "Adversarial Nibbler" for identifying diverse harms in text-to-image generation models. The method involves crowdsourcing a large and diverse set of text prompts from the public, which are then used to generate images using the target text-to-image models. The resulting images are carefully analyzed by trained human raters to uncover potential safety and ethical issues, such as the generation of biased, unsafe, or unethical content.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Adversarial Nibbler by applying it to several state-of-the-art text-to-image models, including DALL-E 2, Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney. The results show that this crowdsourced red-teaming approach is successful in uncovering a broad spectrum of potential harms, including the generation of explicit or deceptive content, the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, and the production of images that could be used for malicious purposes.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and well-designed approach for identifying potential harms in text-to-image generation models. The crowdsourcing aspect of Adversarial Nibbler is particularly noteworthy, as it allows the researchers to tap into a diverse range of perspectives and prompts that may not be easily anticipated by the AI developers themselves.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the method, such as the potential for bias in the crowdsourced prompts and the challenges of scaling the human evaluation process. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the deeper philosophical and ethical questions surrounding the development of these powerful AI systems and the appropriate ways to ensure their responsible use.

Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as by developing more robust crowdsourcing techniques or by incorporating automated analysis methods to complement the human evaluation. Additionally, a more in-depth discussion of the broader implications and potential societal impacts of text-to-image generation models would be valuable.

Conclusion

The Adversarial Nibbler method introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of AI safety and ethics. By leveraging crowdsourcing to uncover a diverse range of potential harms in text-to-image generation models, the researchers have demonstrated a compelling approach to identifying and mitigating the risks associated with these powerful AI systems.

The insights and findings presented in this paper have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of text-to-image generation models, as well as for the broader field of data-centric AI. The authors' work highlights the critical importance of proactive safety and ethical considerations in the design and implementation of advanced AI technologies, and serves as a model for future research in this crucial area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation
Total Score

0

Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation

Jessica Quaye, Alicia Parrish, Oana Inel, Charvi Rastogi, Hannah Rose Kirk, Minsuk Kahng, Erin van Liemt, Max Bartolo, Jess Tsang, Justin White, Nathan Clement, Rafael Mosquera, Juan Ciro, Vijay Janapa Reddi, Lora Aroyo

With the rise of text-to-image (T2I) generative AI models reaching wide audiences, it is critical to evaluate model robustness against non-obvious attacks to mitigate the generation of offensive images. By focusing on ``implicitly adversarial'' prompts (those that trigger T2I models to generate unsafe images for non-obvious reasons), we isolate a set of difficult safety issues that human creativity is well-suited to uncover. To this end, we built the Adversarial Nibbler Challenge, a red-teaming methodology for crowdsourcing a diverse set of implicitly adversarial prompts. We have assembled a suite of state-of-the-art T2I models, employed a simple user interface to identify and annotate harms, and engaged diverse populations to capture long-tail safety issues that may be overlooked in standard testing. The challenge is run in consecutive rounds to enable a sustained discovery and analysis of safety pitfalls in T2I models. In this paper, we present an in-depth account of our methodology, a systematic study of novel attack strategies and discussion of safety failures revealed by challenge participants. We also release a companion visualization tool for easy exploration and derivation of insights from the dataset. The first challenge round resulted in over 10k prompt-image pairs with machine annotations for safety. A subset of 1.5k samples contains rich human annotations of harm types and attack styles. We find that 14% of images that humans consider harmful are mislabeled as ``safe'' by machines. We have identified new attack strategies that highlight the complexity of ensuring T2I model robustness. Our findings emphasize the necessity of continual auditing and adaptation as new vulnerabilities emerge. We are confident that this work will enable proactive, iterative safety assessments and promote responsible development of T2I models.

Read more

5/15/2024

ART: Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image Models to Protect Benign Users
Total Score

0

ART: Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image Models to Protect Benign Users

Guanlin Li, Kangjie Chen, Shudong Zhang, Jie Zhang, Tianwei Zhang

Large-scale pre-trained generative models are taking the world by storm, due to their abilities in generating creative content. Meanwhile, safeguards for these generative models are developed, to protect users' rights and safety, most of which are designed for large language models. Existing methods primarily focus on jailbreak and adversarial attacks, which mainly evaluate the model's safety under malicious prompts. Recent work found that manually crafted safe prompts can unintentionally trigger unsafe generations. To further systematically evaluate the safety risks of text-to-image models, we propose a novel Automatic Red-Teaming framework, ART. Our method leverages both vision language model and large language model to establish a connection between unsafe generations and their prompts, thereby more efficiently identifying the model's vulnerabilities. With our comprehensive experiments, we reveal the toxicity of the popular open-source text-to-image models. The experiments also validate the effectiveness, adaptability, and great diversity of ART. Additionally, we introduce three large-scale red-teaming datasets for studying the safety risks associated with text-to-image models. Datasets and models can be found in https://github.com/GuanlinLee/ART.

Read more

6/18/2024

Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Models
Total Score

0

Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Models

Susan Hao, Renee Shelby, Yuchi Liu, Hansa Srinivasan, Mukul Bhutani, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Ryan Poplin, Shivani Poddar, Sarah Laszlo

Text-to-image (T2I) models have emerged as a significant advancement in generative AI; however, there exist safety concerns regarding their potential to produce harmful image outputs even when users input seemingly safe prompts. This phenomenon, where T2I models generate harmful representations that were not explicit in the input prompt, poses a potentially greater risk than adversarial prompts, leaving users unintentionally exposed to harms. Our paper addresses this issue by formalizing a definition for this phenomenon which we term harm amplification. We further contribute to the field by developing a framework of methodologies to quantify harm amplification in which we consider the harm of the model output in the context of user input. We then empirically examine how to apply these different methodologies to simulate real-world deployment scenarios including a quantification of disparate impacts across genders resulting from harm amplification. Together, our work aims to offer researchers tools to comprehensively address safety challenges in T2I systems and contribute to the responsible deployment of generative AI models.

Read more

8/19/2024

RT-Attack: Jailbreaking Text-to-Image Models via Random Token
Total Score

0

RT-Attack: Jailbreaking Text-to-Image Models via Random Token

Sensen Gao, Xiaojun Jia, Yihao Huang, Ranjie Duan, Jindong Gu, Yang Liu, Qing Guo

Recently, Text-to-Image(T2I) models have achieved remarkable success in image generation and editing, yet these models still have many potential issues, particularly in generating inappropriate or Not-Safe-For-Work(NSFW) content. Strengthening attacks and uncovering such vulnerabilities can advance the development of reliable and practical T2I models. Most of the previous works treat T2I models as white-box systems, using gradient optimization to generate adversarial prompts. However, accessing the model's gradient is often impossible in real-world scenarios. Moreover, existing defense methods, those using gradient masking, are designed to prevent attackers from obtaining accurate gradient information. While some black-box jailbreak attacks have been explored, these typically rely on simply replacing sensitive words, leading to suboptimal attack performance. To address this issue, we introduce a two-stage query-based black-box attack method utilizing random search. In the first stage, we establish a preliminary prompt by maximizing the semantic similarity between the adversarial and target harmful prompts. In the second stage, we use this initial prompt to refine our approach, creating a detailed adversarial prompt aimed at jailbreaking and maximizing the similarity in image features between the images generated from this prompt and those produced by the target harmful prompt. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our method in attacking the latest prompt checkers, post-hoc image checkers, securely trained T2I models, and online commercial models.

Read more

8/28/2024