Article Classification with Graph Neural Networks and Multigraphs
2309.11341
0
0
🏷️
Abstract
Classifying research output into context-specific label taxonomies is a challenging and relevant downstream task, given the volume of existing and newly published articles. We propose a method to enhance the performance of article classification by enriching simple Graph Neural Network (GNN) pipelines with multi-graph representations that simultaneously encode multiple signals of article relatedness, e.g. references, co-authorship, shared publication source, shared subject headings, as distinct edge types. Fully supervised transductive node classification experiments are conducted on the Open Graph Benchmark OGBN-arXiv dataset and the PubMed diabetes dataset, augmented with additional metadata from Microsoft Academic Graph and PubMed Central, respectively. The results demonstrate that multi-graphs consistently improve the performance of a variety of GNN models compared to the default graphs. When deployed with SOTA textual node embedding methods, the transformed multi-graphs enable simple and shallow 2-layer GNN pipelines to achieve results on par with more complex architectures.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Classifying research articles into relevant categories is a challenging task due to the vast number of published papers.
- The paper proposes a method to enhance article classification by using multi-graph representations that capture different signals of article relatedness, such as references, co-authorship, and shared publication sources.
- The authors conduct experiments on two datasets, OGBN-arXiv and PubMed diabetes, to demonstrate the benefits of their multi-graph approach.
Plain English Explanation
Researchers often need to categorize academic papers into specific topics or areas of study. This is a difficult task, given the huge and constantly growing volume of published research. The paper introduces a new way to improve the performance of article classification by using a more sophisticated approach to representing the relationships between papers.
Instead of just looking at a single type of connection between papers, like citations, the authors use multiple types of connections, such as shared authors, shared publication sources, and shared subject areas. These different types of connections are represented as separate "graphs" that are combined to form a multi-graph representation of the papers.
The authors test their multi-graph approach on two different datasets of research papers: the OGBN-arXiv dataset, which covers computer science papers, and the PubMed diabetes dataset, which covers papers on diabetes research. They find that the multi-graph representation consistently improves the performance of various graph neural network models compared to using a single graph.
Importantly, the multi-graph approach allows simple and shallow graph neural network models to achieve results on par with more complex architectures when combined with advanced text-based methods for representing the paper content. This suggests that the multi-graph representation is a powerful way to capture the nuanced relationships between research articles.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a method to enhance the performance of article classification by using multi-graph representations that simultaneously encode multiple signals of article relatedness, such as references, co-authorship, shared publication source, and shared subject headings, as distinct edge types.
The authors conduct fully supervised transductive node classification experiments on the OGBN-arXiv dataset and the PubMed diabetes dataset, augmenting the datasets with additional metadata from Microsoft Academic Graph and PubMed Central, respectively.
The results demonstrate that the multi-graph approach consistently improves the performance of a variety of graph neural network (GNN) models compared to using the default graphs. When deployed with state-of-the-art textual node embedding methods, the transformed multi-graphs enable simple and shallow 2-layer GNN pipelines to achieve results on par with more complex architectures, such as E2GNN.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling approach to enhancing article classification by leveraging multi-graph representations. However, the authors do not extensively discuss the potential limitations or caveats of their method.
For example, the construction of the multi-graph representations relies on the availability of metadata, such as citation information, co-authorship data, and subject headings. In practice, this metadata may not always be complete or accurate, which could impact the performance of the proposed approach.
Additionally, the paper focuses on fully supervised transductive node classification experiments, which may not reflect real-world scenarios where labeled data is scarce. Further research could explore the performance of the multi-graph approach in semi-supervised or inductive learning settings.
While the results demonstrate the benefits of the multi-graph representation, the authors could have provided more insights into the specific advantages and trade-offs of using different edge types within the multi-graph. A deeper analysis of the relative importance and contributions of each edge type could help researchers understand the underlying mechanisms driving the performance improvements.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel method for enhancing article classification by using multi-graph representations that capture various signals of article relatedness. The experimental results on the OGBN-arXiv and PubMed diabetes datasets show that the multi-graph approach consistently outperforms single-graph baselines, allowing simple and shallow graph neural network models to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
This research highlights the importance of leveraging diverse sources of information when classifying research articles and suggests that multi-graph representations could be a valuable tool for organizing and understanding the growing volume of published literature. The findings may have implications for a wide range of applications, from automated research topic identification to personalized recommendation systems for academic content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A data-centric approach for assessing progress of Graph Neural Networks
Tianqi Zhao, Ngan Thi Dong, Alan Hanjalic, Megha Khosla
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in node classification tasks. However, most improvements are in multi-class classification, with less focus on the cases where each node could have multiple labels. The first challenge in studying multi-label node classification is the scarcity of publicly available datasets. To address this, we collected and released three real-world biological datasets and developed a multi-label graph generator with tunable properties. We also argue that traditional notions of homophily and heterophily do not apply well to multi-label scenarios. Therefore, we define homophily and Cross-Class Neighborhood Similarity for multi-label classification and investigate $9$ collected multi-label datasets. Lastly, we conducted a large-scale comparative study with $8$ methods across nine datasets to evaluate current progress in multi-label node classification. We release our code at url{https://github.com/Tianqi-py/MLGNC}.
6/19/2024
Global-Local Graph Neural Networks for Node-Classification
Moshe Eliasof, Eran Treister
0
0
The task of graph node classification is often approached by utilizing a local Graph Neural Network (GNN), that learns only local information from the node input features and their adjacency. In this paper, we propose to improve the performance of node classification GNNs by utilizing both global and local information, specifically by learning label- and node- features. We therefore call our method Global-Local-GNN (GLGNN). To learn proper label features, for each label, we maximize the similarity between its features and nodes features that belong to the label, while maximizing the distance between nodes that do not belong to the considered label. We then use the learnt label features to predict the node classification map. We demonstrate our GLGNN using three different GNN backbones, and show that our approach improves baseline performance, revealing the importance of global information utilization for node classification.
6/18/2024
Hypergraph-enhanced Dual Semi-supervised Graph Classification
Wei Ju, Zhengyang Mao, Siyu Yi, Yifang Qin, Yiyang Gu, Zhiping Xiao, Yifan Wang, Xiao Luo, Ming Zhang
0
0
In this paper, we study semi-supervised graph classification, which aims at accurately predicting the categories of graphs in scenarios with limited labeled graphs and abundant unlabeled graphs. Despite the promising capability of graph neural networks (GNNs), they typically require a large number of costly labeled graphs, while a wealth of unlabeled graphs fail to be effectively utilized. Moreover, GNNs are inherently limited to encoding local neighborhood information using message-passing mechanisms, thus lacking the ability to model higher-order dependencies among nodes. To tackle these challenges, we propose a Hypergraph-Enhanced DuAL framework named HEAL for semi-supervised graph classification, which captures graph semantics from the perspective of the hypergraph and the line graph, respectively. Specifically, to better explore the higher-order relationships among nodes, we design a hypergraph structure learning to adaptively learn complex node dependencies beyond pairwise relations. Meanwhile, based on the learned hypergraph, we introduce a line graph to capture the interaction between hyperedges, thereby better mining the underlying semantic structures. Finally, we develop a relational consistency learning to facilitate knowledge transfer between the two branches and provide better mutual guidance. Extensive experiments on real-world graph datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed method against existing state-of-the-art methods.
5/29/2024
💬
Graph Machine Learning in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Wenqi Fan, Shijie Wang, Jiani Huang, Zhikai Chen, Yu Song, Wenzhuo Tang, Haitao Mao, Hui Liu, Xiaorui Liu, Dawei Yin, Qing Li
0
0
Graphs play an important role in representing complex relationships in various domains like social networks, knowledge graphs, and molecular discovery. With the advent of deep learning, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a cornerstone in Graph Machine Learning (Graph ML), facilitating the representation and processing of graph structures. Recently, LLMs have demonstrated unprecedented capabilities in language tasks and are widely adopted in a variety of applications such as computer vision and recommender systems. This remarkable success has also attracted interest in applying LLMs to the graph domain. Increasing efforts have been made to explore the potential of LLMs in advancing Graph ML's generalization, transferability, and few-shot learning ability. Meanwhile, graphs, especially knowledge graphs, are rich in reliable factual knowledge, which can be utilized to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and potentially alleviate their limitations such as hallucinations and the lack of explainability. Given the rapid progress of this research direction, a systematic review summarizing the latest advancements for Graph ML in the era of LLMs is necessary to provide an in-depth understanding to researchers and practitioners. Therefore, in this survey, we first review the recent developments in Graph ML. We then explore how LLMs can be utilized to enhance the quality of graph features, alleviate the reliance on labeled data, and address challenges such as graph heterogeneity and out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. Afterward, we delve into how graphs can enhance LLMs, highlighting their abilities to enhance LLM pre-training and inference. Furthermore, we investigate various applications and discuss the potential future directions in this promising field.
6/5/2024