Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive review of how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is used in Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs).
- SLRs are a rigorous and organized methodology for assessing and integrating previous research on a given topic.
- The paper examines the use of AI techniques to semi-automate the SLR process, particularly in the screening and extraction phases.
- It analyzes 21 leading SLR tools and 11 recent tools that leverage large language models for literature searches and academic writing assistance.
- The paper discusses current trends, research challenges, and future research directions in this field.
Plain English Explanation
[Systematic Literature Reviews](Overview of Systematic Literature Reviews) are a way for researchers to thoroughly gather and analyze all the existing research on a specific topic. This process can be time-consuming and tedious, so researchers have started using [Artificial Intelligence](Overview of Artificial Intelligence) to help automate parts of it.
This paper looks at how AI is being used to [semi-automate the Systematic Literature Review process](Semi-Automation of Systematic Literature Reviews). It examines 21 different software tools that use AI to assist with things like [screening research studies](Screening Research Studies Using AI) and [extracting key information](Extracting Information Using AI). The paper also analyzes 11 newer tools that use [large language models](Overview of Large Language Models) to help with literature searches and writing.
The paper discusses the current state of this field, the challenges researchers are facing, and ideas for how AI could be used even more in the future to make literature reviews faster and more efficient.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive review of the use of Artificial Intelligence in Systematic Literature Reviews. The authors examine how AI techniques are applied to semi-automate the SLR process, with a focus on the screening and extraction phases.
The researchers assess 21 leading SLR tools using a framework that combines 23 traditional features with 11 AI-based features. They also analyze 11 recent tools that leverage large language models for literature searching and academic writing assistance.
The paper discusses current trends in the field, outlines key research challenges, and suggests directions for future work. These include improving the accuracy and efficiency of AI-powered screening and extraction, as well as developing more advanced tools that can assist researchers throughout the entire SLR process.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the use of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews. It highlights the significant potential for AI to streamline and semi-automate various aspects of the SLR process, which could lead to more efficient and effective research synthesis.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and challenges that need to be addressed. For example, the accuracy of AI-powered screening and extraction is still an area of active research, and more work is needed to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of these tools. Additionally, the integration of AI-based tools into the existing SLR workflow may present organizational and cultural challenges that need to be carefully navigated.
Furthermore, the paper suggests that the development of more advanced AI-powered tools that can assist researchers throughout the entire SLR process is a promising direction for future research. This could include AI-driven approaches to research question formulation, protocol development, and meta-analysis, among other key SLR tasks.
Overall, this paper provides a valuable and insightful exploration of the current state of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews, as well as a roadmap for addressing the remaining challenges and advancing the field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the use of Artificial Intelligence in Systematic Literature Reviews. It examines how AI techniques are applied to semi-automate the SLR process, particularly in the screening and extraction phases. The researchers analyze a range of existing SLR tools and newer tools that leverage large language models, and discuss current trends, research challenges, and future research directions.
The paper highlights the significant potential for AI to streamline and enhance the SLR process, leading to more efficient and effective research synthesis. However, it also acknowledges the need to address various limitations and challenges, such as improving the accuracy and reliability of AI-powered tools, and integrating them into existing SLR workflows. The authors suggest that developing more advanced AI-driven approaches to support researchers throughout the entire SLR process is a promising area for future work.
Overall, this paper provides a valuable and insightful exploration of the intersection of AI and Systematic Literature Reviews, and serves as a roadmap for researchers and practitioners looking to leverage the power of AI in their literature review efforts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges
Francisco Bolanos, Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Enrico Motta
This manuscript presents a comprehensive review of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs). A SLR is a rigorous and organised methodology that assesses and integrates previous research on a given topic. Numerous tools have been developed to assist and partially automate the SLR process. The increasing role of AI in this field shows great potential in providing more effective support for researchers, moving towards the semi-automatic creation of literature reviews. Our study focuses on how AI techniques are applied in the semi-automation of SLRs, specifically in the screening and extraction phases. We examine 21 leading SLR tools using a framework that combines 23 traditional features with 11 AI features. We also analyse 11 recent tools that leverage large language models for searching the literature and assisting academic writing. Finally, the paper discusses current trends in the field, outlines key research challenges, and suggests directions for future research.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Automating Research Synthesis with Domain-Specific Large Language Model Fine-Tuning
Teo Susnjak, Peter Hwang, Napoleon H. Reyes, Andre L. C. Barczak, Timothy R. McIntosh, Surangika Ranathunga
This research pioneers the use of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs), presenting a significant and novel contribution in integrating AI to enhance academic research methodologies. Our study employed the latest fine-tuning methodologies together with open-sourced LLMs, and demonstrated a practical and efficient approach to automating the final execution stages of an SLR process that involves knowledge synthesis. The results maintained high fidelity in factual accuracy in LLM responses, and were validated through the replication of an existing PRISMA-conforming SLR. Our research proposed solutions for mitigating LLM hallucination and proposed mechanisms for tracking LLM responses to their sources of information, thus demonstrating how this approach can meet the rigorous demands of scholarly research. The findings ultimately confirmed the potential of fine-tuned LLMs in streamlining various labor-intensive processes of conducting literature reviews. Given the potential of this approach and its applicability across all research domains, this foundational study also advocated for updating PRISMA reporting guidelines to incorporate AI-driven processes, ensuring methodological transparency and reliability in future SLRs. This study broadens the appeal of AI-enhanced tools across various academic and research fields, setting a new standard for conducting comprehensive and accurate literature reviews with more efficiency in the face of ever-increasing volumes of academic studies.
Read more4/16/2024
🏷️
0
The Literature Review Network: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Systematic Literature Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Method Development
Joshua Morriss, Tod Brindle, Jessica Bah Rosman, Daniel Reibsamen, Andreas Enz
Systematic literature reviews are the highest quality of evidence in research. However, the review process is hindered by significant resource and data constraints. The Literature Review Network (LRN) is the first of its kind explainable AI platform adhering to PRISMA 2020 standards, designed to automate the entire literature review process. LRN was evaluated in the domain of surgical glove practices using 3 search strings developed by experts to query PubMed. A non-expert trained all LRN models. Performance was benchmarked against an expert manual review. Explainability and performance metrics assessed LRN's ability to replicate the experts' review. Concordance was measured with the Jaccard index and confusion matrices. Researchers were blinded to the other's results until study completion. Overlapping studies were integrated into an LRN-generated systematic review. LRN models demonstrated superior classification accuracy without expert training, achieving 84.78% and 85.71% accuracy. The highest performance model achieved high interrater reliability (k = 0.4953) and explainability metrics, linking 'reduce', 'accident', and 'sharp' with 'double-gloving'. Another LRN model covered 91.51% of the relevant literature despite diverging from the non-expert's judgments (k = 0.2174), with the terms 'latex', 'double' (gloves), and 'indication'. LRN outperformed the manual review (19,920 minutes over 11 months), reducing the entire process to 288.6 minutes over 5 days. This study demonstrates that explainable AI does not require expert training to successfully conduct PRISMA-compliant systematic literature reviews like an expert. LRN summarized the results of surgical glove studies and identified themes that were nearly identical to the clinical researchers' findings. Explainable AI can accurately expedite our understanding of clinical practices, potentially revolutionizing healthcare research.
Read more8/13/2024
💬
0
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) as a tool in literature reviews: an LLM automated systematic review
Dmitry Scherbakov, Nina Hubig, Vinita Jansari, Alexander Bakumenko, Leslie A. Lenert
Objective: This study aims to summarize the usage of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the process of creating a scientific review. We look at the range of stages in a review that can be automated and assess the current state-of-the-art research projects in the field. Materials and Methods: The search was conducted in June 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, Dimensions, and Google Scholar databases by human reviewers. Screening and extraction process took place in Covidence with the help of LLM add-on which uses OpenAI gpt-4o model. ChatGPT was used to clean extracted data and generate code for figures in this manuscript, ChatGPT and Scite.ai were used in drafting all components of the manuscript, except the methods and discussion sections. Results: 3,788 articles were retrieved, and 172 studies were deemed eligible for the final review. ChatGPT and GPT-based LLM emerged as the most dominant architecture for review automation (n=126, 73.2%). A significant number of review automation projects were found, but only a limited number of papers (n=26, 15.1%) were actual reviews that used LLM during their creation. Most citations focused on automation of a particular stage of review, such as Searching for publications (n=60, 34.9%), and Data extraction (n=54, 31.4%). When comparing pooled performance of GPT-based and BERT-based models, the former were better in data extraction with mean precision 83.0% (SD=10.4), and recall 86.0% (SD=9.8), while being slightly less accurate in title and abstract screening stage (Maccuracy=77.3%, SD=13.0). Discussion/Conclusion: Our LLM-assisted systematic review revealed a significant number of research projects related to review automation using LLMs. The results looked promising, and we anticipate that LLMs will change in the near future the way the scientific reviews are conducted.
Read more9/10/2024