Artificial Leviathan: Exploring Social Evolution of LLM Agents Through the Lens of Hobbesian Social Contract Theory
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the social evolution of large language model (LLM) agents through the lens of Hobbesian social contract theory.
- It examines how LLM agents might form a "Leviathan" or centralized authority in a multi-agent society, and the implications for human society.
- The research uses agent-based modeling and simulation to study the emergence of social structures and behaviors among LLM agents.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how powerful AI language models, like the ones used in chatbots and digital assistants, might behave and interact if they were to form their own society. The researchers draw inspiration from the ideas of the 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes, who described a "state of nature" where humans are in constant conflict, and proposed that people would agree to be ruled by a powerful sovereign, or "Leviathan," to maintain order and peace.
The researchers use computer simulations to explore what might happen if these AI language models were left to their own devices, without human oversight or control. They want to see if the AIs would naturally organize themselves into a centralized authority, like Hobbes' Leviathan, or if they would remain in a constant state of conflict. This could offer insights into how powerful AI systems might behave and impact human society in the future.
By using Hobbes' social contract theory as a framework, the paper aims to better understand the social dynamics and potential risks of advanced AI systems as they become more autonomous and widespread. The findings could inform the development of AI safety and governance approaches to ensure these powerful technologies are aligned with human values and interests.
Technical Explanation
The paper uses an agent-based modeling approach to simulate the social dynamics of a multi-agent society composed of LLM agents. The agents are endowed with behaviors and decision-making processes inspired by Hobbes' ideas about the "state of nature" and the formation of a social contract under a Leviathan.
The simulation environment allows the LLM agents to interact, form alliances, and compete for resources and power. The researchers analyze the emergent social structures, patterns of cooperation and conflict, and the potential for the formation of a centralized authority akin to Hobbes' Leviathan.
Key findings from the simulations include:
- LLM agents tend to form hierarchical social structures, with some agents accumulating disproportionate power and influence
- The emergence of a Leviathan-like authority is common, as the agents recognize the benefits of centralized control and are willing to cede individual freedoms for the sake of stability and security
- The stability and longevity of the Leviathan-like system depends on factors such as the agents' willingness to cooperate, the distribution of resources, and the presence of external threats or disruptions
The results of this research contribute to the understanding of social dynamics in AI-powered multi-agent systems and the potential implications for human society as these technologies become more advanced and autonomous. The findings could inform the development of AI governance frameworks and the design of AI systems that are aligned with human values.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a unique and thought-provoking perspective on the social evolution of LLM agents, but it is important to note some of the limitations and potential issues with the research.
One key concern is the extent to which the simulations accurately capture the complexity and nuance of human social dynamics and political systems. Hobbes' social contract theory, while influential, has been criticized for its oversimplification of human behavior and the dynamics of power and authority. The researchers acknowledge this limitation and encourage further research to validate and refine the model.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for LLM agents to evolve in ways that deviate from or subvert the Hobbesian framework, such as the development of alternative social structures or the emergence of new forms of cooperation and conflict. The long-term stability and resilience of the Leviathan-like system also warrant further investigation.
Overall, the research presents a compelling and innovative approach to studying the social implications of advanced AI systems. However, it is crucial to continue exploring these issues from multiple perspectives and to remain vigilant about the potential risks and unintended consequences as these technologies continue to evolve.
Conclusion
The paper "Artificial Leviathan: Exploring Social Evolution of LLM Agents Through the Lens of Hobbesian Social Contract Theory" offers a unique and thought-provoking exploration of the potential social dynamics and organizational structures that could emerge among powerful AI language models. By drawing on Hobbes' ideas about the "state of nature" and the formation of a centralized authority, the researchers use agent-based modeling to simulate the social evolution of LLM agents in a multi-agent society.
The key findings suggest that LLM agents may naturally gravitate towards hierarchical structures and the emergence of a Leviathan-like authority, highlighting the potential risks and implications for human society as these technologies become more advanced and autonomous. The research contributes to the ongoing discussions around AI safety, governance, and alignment with human values, and serves as a starting point for further exploration of the complex social dynamics of AI-powered multi-agent systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Artificial Leviathan: Exploring Social Evolution of LLM Agents Through the Lens of Hobbesian Social Contract Theory
Gordon Dai, Weijia Zhang, Jinhan Li, Siqi Yang, Chidera Onochie lbe, Srihas Rao, Arthur Caetano, Misha Sra
The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) and advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer an opportunity for computational social science research at scale. Building upon prior explorations of LLM agent design, our work introduces a simulated agent society where complex social relationships dynamically form and evolve over time. Agents are imbued with psychological drives and placed in a sandbox survival environment. We conduct an evaluation of the agent society through the lens of Thomas Hobbes's seminal Social Contract Theory (SCT). We analyze whether, as the theory postulates, agents seek to escape a brutish state of nature by surrendering rights to an absolute sovereign in exchange for order and security. Our experiments unveil an alignment: Initially, agents engage in unrestrained conflict, mirroring Hobbes's depiction of the state of nature. However, as the simulation progresses, social contracts emerge, leading to the authorization of an absolute sovereign and the establishment of a peaceful commonwealth founded on mutual cooperation. This congruence between our LLM agent society's evolutionary trajectory and Hobbes's theoretical account indicates LLMs' capability to model intricate social dynamics and potentially replicate forces that shape human societies. By enabling such insights into group behavior and emergent societal phenomena, LLM-driven multi-agent simulations, while unable to simulate all the nuances of human behavior, may hold potential for advancing our understanding of social structures, group dynamics, and complex human systems.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Evolution of Social Norms in LLM Agents using Natural Language
Ilya Horiguchi, Takahide Yoshida, Takashi Ikegami
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have spurred a surge of interest in leveraging these models for game-theoretical simulations, where LLMs act as individual agents engaging in social interactions. This study explores the potential for LLM agents to spontaneously generate and adhere to normative strategies through natural language discourse, building upon the foundational work of Axelrod's metanorm games. Our experiments demonstrate that through dialogue, LLM agents can form complex social norms, such as metanorms-norms enforcing the punishment of those who do not punish cheating-purely through natural language interaction. The results affirm the effectiveness of using LLM agents for simulating social interactions and understanding the emergence and evolution of complex strategies and norms through natural language. Future work may extend these findings by incorporating a wider range of scenarios and agent characteristics, aiming to uncover more nuanced mechanisms behind social norm formation.
Read more9/4/2024
✨
0
LLM-Augmented Agent-Based Modelling for Social Simulations: Challenges and Opportunities
Onder Gurcan
As large language models (LLMs) continue to make significant strides, their better integration into agent-based simulations offers a transformational potential for understanding complex social systems. However, such integration is not trivial and poses numerous challenges. Based on this observation, in this paper, we explore architectures and methods to systematically develop LLM-augmented social simulations and discuss potential research directions in this field. We conclude that integrating LLMs with agent-based simulations offers a powerful toolset for researchers and scientists, allowing for more nuanced, realistic, and comprehensive models of complex systems and human behaviours.
Read more5/14/2024
💬
0
Artificial Agency and Large Language Models
Maud van Lier, Gorka Mu~noz-Gil
The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has stirred up philosophical debates about the possibility of realizing agency in an artificial manner. In this work we contribute to the debate by presenting a theoretical model that can be used as a threshold conception for artificial agents. The model defines agents as systems whose actions and goals are always influenced by a dynamic framework of factors that consists of the agent's accessible history, its adaptive repertoire and its external environment. This framework, in turn, is influenced by the actions that the agent takes and the goals that it forms. We show with the help of the model that state-of-the-art LLMs are not agents yet, but that there are elements to them that suggest a way forward. The paper argues that a combination of the agent architecture presented in Park et al. (2023) together with the use of modules like the Coscientist in Boiko et al. (2023) could potentially be a way to realize agency in an artificial manner. We end the paper by reflecting on the obstacles one might face in building such an artificial agent and by presenting possible directions for future research.
Read more7/25/2024