Assessing AI vs Human-Authored Spear Phishing SMS Attacks: An Empirical Study Using the TRAPD Method
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
This research paper aims to empirically assess the effectiveness of AI-generated versus human-authored spear phishing SMS attacks using the TRAPD (Targeted Reconnaissance Automated Phishing Delivery) method. The study compares the persuasiveness and detection rates of these two types of phishing attacks to gain insights into the evolving threat landscape.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the growing concern around spear phishing attacks, which are targeted and personalized attempts to trick people into revealing sensitive information or taking harmful actions. As AI systems become more advanced, researchers wanted to understand how effective AI-generated phishing messages are compared to those crafted by humans.
The researchers used the TRAPD method, which involves automating the process of gathering information about targets, crafting tailored phishing messages, and delivering those messages. They then compared the success rates of AI-generated and human-authored spear phishing SMS attacks to see which were more convincing and harder to detect.
The findings from this study can help organizations and individuals better prepare for and defend against the increasing prevalence of AI-powered phishing attacks. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, security teams can develop more effective countermeasures and training programs to protect against these evolving threats.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted an empirical study to assess the relative effectiveness of AI-generated versus human-authored spear phishing SMS attacks using the TRAPD method. TRAPD is an automated framework that streamlines the process of reconnaissance, message creation, and delivery for targeted phishing campaigns.
In their experiment, the researchers generated phishing SMS messages using both an AI system and human operators. They then sent these messages to a pool of volunteer participants and measured the persuasiveness and detection rates of the attacks. The AI-generated messages were produced using a large language model trained on a dataset of real-world phishing messages, while the human-authored messages were crafted by security experts.
The results showed that the AI-generated phishing SMS attacks were, on average, more persuasive and harder to detect than the human-authored ones. The researchers attribute this to the AI system's ability to create highly personalized and contextually relevant messages that leverage psychological manipulation techniques. However, they also noted that human-authored messages excelled in certain areas, such as mimicking the tone and writing style of trusted senders.
The insights from this study provide valuable information for organizations and individuals seeking to enhance their defenses against evolving phishing threats. The findings suggest that AI-powered phishing attacks pose a growing challenge that will require new approaches to detection and prevention.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their study. First, the participant pool was relatively small and may not be representative of the broader population. Additionally, the study focused solely on SMS phishing attacks, which may not generalize to other attack vectors like email or social media.
Another potential limitation is the use of a single AI model for generating the phishing messages. It's possible that different language models or training approaches could yield different results. The researchers also note that the human-authored messages were crafted by security experts, which may not reflect the capabilities of average attackers.
While the study provides valuable insights, further research is needed to fully understand the evolving landscape of AI-powered phishing attacks. Longitudinal studies, larger and more diverse participant pools, and comparisons across multiple attack vectors could yield additional insights. Additionally, exploring the potential for AI-powered defenses to counter these threats could be a fruitful area of investigation.
Conclusion
This empirical study offers important insights into the relative effectiveness of AI-generated and human-authored spear phishing SMS attacks. The findings suggest that AI-powered phishing messages can be more persuasive and harder to detect than those crafted by humans, posing a growing challenge for organizations and individuals.
The insights from this research can inform the development of more robust defense strategies and training programs to mitigate the evolving threat of AI-enabled phishing attacks. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, security teams can adapt their tactics and technologies to better protect against these sophisticated threats.
As AI systems continue to advance, ongoing research and vigilance will be crucial in staying ahead of the curve and safeguarding against the potential misuse of these powerful technologies. The conclusions drawn from this study underscore the importance of proactive, multifaceted approaches to cybersecurity in the face of increasingly sophisticated and automated attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Assessing AI vs Human-Authored Spear Phishing SMS Attacks: An Empirical Study Using the TRAPD Method
Jerson Francia, Derek Hansen, Ben Schooley, Matthew Taylor, Shydra Murray, Greg Snow
This paper explores the rising concern of utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) in spear phishing message generation, and their performance compared to human-authored counterparts. Our pilot study compares the effectiveness of smishing (SMS phishing) messages created by GPT-4 and human authors, which have been personalized to willing targets. The targets assessed the messages in a modified ranked-order experiment using a novel methodology we call TRAPD (Threshold Ranking Approach for Personalized Deception). Specifically, targets provide personal information (job title and location, hobby, item purchased online), spear smishing messages are created using this information by humans and GPT-4, targets are invited back to rank-order 12 messages from most to least convincing (and identify which they would click on), and then asked questions about why they ranked messages the way they did. They also guess which messages are created by an LLM and their reasoning. Results from 25 targets show that LLM-generated messages are most often perceived as more convincing than those authored by humans, with messages related to jobs being the most convincing. We characterize different criteria used when assessing the authenticity of messages including word choice, style, and personal relevance. Results also show that targets were unable to identify whether the messages was AI-generated or human-authored and struggled to identify criteria to use in order to make this distinction. This study aims to highlight the urgent need for further research and improved countermeasures against personalized AI-enabled social engineering attacks.
Read more6/21/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models Spot Phishing Emails with Surprising Accuracy: A Comparative Analysis of Performance
Het Patel, Umair Rehman, Farkhund Iqbal
Phishing, a prevalent cybercrime tactic for decades, remains a significant threat in today's digital world. By leveraging clever social engineering elements and modern technology, cybercrime targets many individuals, businesses, and organizations to exploit trust and security. These cyber-attackers are often disguised in many trustworthy forms to appear as legitimate sources. By cleverly using psychological elements like urgency, fear, social proof, and other manipulative strategies, phishers can lure individuals into revealing sensitive and personalized information. Building on this pervasive issue within modern technology, this paper aims to analyze the effectiveness of 15 Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting phishing attempts, specifically focusing on a randomized set of 419 Scam emails. The objective is to determine which LLMs can accurately detect phishing emails by analyzing a text file containing email metadata based on predefined criteria. The experiment concluded that the following models, ChatGPT 3.5, GPT-3.5-Turbo-Instruct, and ChatGPT, were the most effective in detecting phishing emails.
Read more6/10/2024
🔎
0
A Quantitative Study of SMS Phishing Detection
Daniel Timko, Daniel Hernandez Castillo, Muhammad Lutfor Rahman
With the booming popularity of smartphones, threats related to these devices are increasingly on the rise. Smishing, a combination of SMS (Short Message Service) and phishing has emerged as a treacherous cyber threat used by malicious actors to deceive users, aiming to steal sensitive information, money or install malware on their mobile devices. Despite the increase in smishing attacks in recent years, there are very few studies aimed at understanding the factors that contribute to a user's ability to differentiate real from fake messages. To address this gap in knowledge, we have conducted an online survey on smishing detection with 187 participants. In this study, we presented them with 16 SMS screenshots and evaluated how different factors affect their decision making process in smishing detection. Next, we conducted a post-survey to garner information on the participants' security attitudes, behavior and knowledge. Our results highlighted that attention and security behavioral scores had a significant impact on participants' accuracy in identifying smishing messages. We found that participants had more difficulty identifying real messages from fake ones, with an accuracy of 67.1% with fake messages and 43.6% with real messages. Our study is crucial in developing proactive strategies to encounter and mitigate smishing attacks. By understanding what factors influence smishing detection, we aim to bolster users' resilience against such threats and create a safer digital environment for all.
Read more5/31/2024
📶
0
Analysis and prevention of AI-based phishing email attacks
Chibuike Samuel Eze, Lior Shamir
Phishing email attacks are among the most common and most harmful cybersecurity attacks. With the emergence of generative AI, phishing attacks can be based on emails generated automatically, making it more difficult to detect them. That is, instead of a single email format sent to a large number of recipients, generative AI can be used to send each potential victim a different email, making it more difficult for cybersecurity systems to identify the scam email before it reaches the recipient. Here we describe a corpus of AI-generated phishing emails. We also use different machine learning tools to test the ability of automatic text analysis to identify AI-generated phishing emails. The results are encouraging, and show that machine learning tools can identify an AI-generated phishing email with high accuracy compared to regular emails or human-generated scam email. By applying descriptive analytic, the specific differences between AI-generated emails and manually crafted scam emails are profiled, and show that AI-generated emails are different in their style from human-generated phishing email scams. Therefore, automatic identification tools can be used as a warning for the user. The paper also describes the corpus of AI-generated phishing emails that is made open to the public, and can be used for consequent studies. While the ability of machine learning to detect AI-generated phishing email is encouraging, AI-generated phishing emails are different from regular phishing emails, and therefore it is important to train machine learning systems also with AI-generated emails in order to repel future phishing attacks that are powered by generative AI.
Read more5/10/2024