Analysis and prevention of AI-based phishing email attacks

Read original: arXiv:2405.05435 - Published 5/10/2024 by Chibuike Samuel Eze, Lior Shamir
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Phishing emails are a common and harmful type of cybersecurity attack
  • Generative AI can be used to create customized, automated phishing emails that are harder to detect
  • This paper explores a dataset of AI-generated phishing emails and tests machine learning tools for identifying them

Plain English Explanation

Phishing emails are a major problem in cybersecurity, where criminals try to trick people into revealing sensitive information or taking harmful actions. With the rise of generative AI, these phishing attacks can become even more dangerous. Instead of sending the same generic email to many people, AI can be used to generate a unique email for each potential victim. This makes it harder for security systems to spot the scam before it reaches the target.

In this research, the authors created a dataset of AI-generated phishing emails and tested different machine learning tools to see how well they could identify these emails. The good news is that the machine learning models were able to detect the AI-generated phishing emails with high accuracy, compared to regular emails or manually crafted phishing scams. This is because there are some distinct differences in the style and content of AI-generated emails versus human-made ones.

However, the researchers note that as AI systems continue to improve, it will be important for detection tools to also evolve and be trained on the latest AI-generated phishing techniques. The dataset of AI phishing emails created in this study is being made publicly available for further research in this area.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by describing the growing threat of phishing attacks powered by generative AI. Instead of a single email format sent to many people, AI can be used to generate a unique phishing email for each potential victim. This makes it much harder for cybersecurity systems to detect and block these attacks before they reach their targets.

To study this problem, the researchers created a corpus of AI-generated phishing emails. They then used various machine learning techniques, including text analysis and classification models, to assess the ability of automated systems to identify these AI-generated phishing emails. The results showed that the machine learning tools were able to detect the AI-generated phishing emails with high accuracy, outperforming their ability to identify regular phishing emails crafted by humans.

Further analysis revealed that there are distinct stylistic and content-based differences between the AI-generated phishing emails and manually created phishing scams. For example, the AI-generated emails tended to have more variation in sentence structure, vocabulary, and overall writing style compared to the human-made phishing attempts.

These findings suggest that current AI detection systems can be effective at identifying phishing emails created by generative AI models. However, the researchers caution that as AI systems become more sophisticated, the detection models will need to be continuously updated and trained on the latest AI-generated phishing techniques to maintain their effectiveness.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing battle against phishing attacks, particularly those enabled by generative AI. The creation of a dataset of AI-generated phishing emails and the demonstration of machine learning's ability to detect these emails are important steps forward.

However, the paper also highlights the need for continued vigilance and adaptation in the face of evolving threats. As the authors note, the current machine learning detection models may only be effective against the specific AI techniques used in this study. As generative AI systems become more advanced, the phishing emails they generate may become increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-crafted ones.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for adversarial attacks, where the phishing email generators could be designed to intentionally mimic human writing patterns and evade detection. This is an important area for future research, as it could reveal the limitations of the current detection approaches.

Overall, this paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the challenges posed by AI-generated phishing emails and the potential of machine learning to address them. However, ongoing research and adaptation will be crucial to staying ahead of the evolving threat landscape.

Conclusion

This research highlights the growing threat of phishing attacks powered by generative AI and demonstrates the potential for machine learning to detect these AI-generated phishing emails with high accuracy. By creating a dataset of AI-generated phishing emails and testing various detection models, the authors have made an important contribution to the field of cybersecurity.

While the current machine learning techniques show promise, the researchers caution that as generative AI systems become more sophisticated, the detection models will need to be continuously updated and trained on the latest phishing techniques. Ongoing vigilance and adaptation will be crucial to staying ahead of this evolving threat.

The open-source release of the AI-generated phishing email dataset is also a valuable resource for further research in this area, allowing other researchers to build upon these findings and develop even more effective detection and mitigation strategies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Analysis and prevention of AI-based phishing email attacks

Chibuike Samuel Eze, Lior Shamir

Phishing email attacks are among the most common and most harmful cybersecurity attacks. With the emergence of generative AI, phishing attacks can be based on emails generated automatically, making it more difficult to detect them. That is, instead of a single email format sent to a large number of recipients, generative AI can be used to send each potential victim a different email, making it more difficult for cybersecurity systems to identify the scam email before it reaches the recipient. Here we describe a corpus of AI-generated phishing emails. We also use different machine learning tools to test the ability of automatic text analysis to identify AI-generated phishing emails. The results are encouraging, and show that machine learning tools can identify an AI-generated phishing email with high accuracy compared to regular emails or human-generated scam email. By applying descriptive analytic, the specific differences between AI-generated emails and manually crafted scam emails are profiled, and show that AI-generated emails are different in their style from human-generated phishing email scams. Therefore, automatic identification tools can be used as a warning for the user. The paper also describes the corpus of AI-generated phishing emails that is made open to the public, and can be used for consequent studies. While the ability of machine learning to detect AI-generated phishing email is encouraging, AI-generated phishing emails are different from regular phishing emails, and therefore it is important to train machine learning systems also with AI-generated emails in order to repel future phishing attacks that are powered by generative AI.

Read more

5/10/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Novel Interpretable and Robust Web-based AI Platform for Phishing Email Detection

Abdulla Al-Subaiey, Mohammed Al-Thani, Naser Abdullah Alam, Kaniz Fatema Antora, Amith Khandakar, SM Ashfaq Uz Zaman

Phishing emails continue to pose a significant threat, causing financial losses and security breaches. This study addresses limitations in existing research, such as reliance on proprietary datasets and lack of real-world application, by proposing a high-performance machine learning model for email classification. Utilizing a comprehensive and largest available public dataset, the model achieves a f1 score of 0.99 and is designed for deployment within relevant applications. Additionally, Explainable AI (XAI) is integrated to enhance user trust. This research offers a practical and highly accurate solution, contributing to the fight against phishing by empowering users with a real-time web-based application for phishing email detection.

Read more

5/21/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Models Spot Phishing Emails with Surprising Accuracy: A Comparative Analysis of Performance

Het Patel, Umair Rehman, Farkhund Iqbal

Phishing, a prevalent cybercrime tactic for decades, remains a significant threat in today's digital world. By leveraging clever social engineering elements and modern technology, cybercrime targets many individuals, businesses, and organizations to exploit trust and security. These cyber-attackers are often disguised in many trustworthy forms to appear as legitimate sources. By cleverly using psychological elements like urgency, fear, social proof, and other manipulative strategies, phishers can lure individuals into revealing sensitive and personalized information. Building on this pervasive issue within modern technology, this paper aims to analyze the effectiveness of 15 Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting phishing attempts, specifically focusing on a randomized set of 419 Scam emails. The objective is to determine which LLMs can accurately detect phishing emails by analyzing a text file containing email metadata based on predefined criteria. The experiment concluded that the following models, ChatGPT 3.5, GPT-3.5-Turbo-Instruct, and ChatGPT, were the most effective in detecting phishing emails.

Read more

6/10/2024

Assessing AI vs Human-Authored Spear Phishing SMS Attacks: An Empirical Study Using the TRAPD Method
Total Score

0

Assessing AI vs Human-Authored Spear Phishing SMS Attacks: An Empirical Study Using the TRAPD Method

Jerson Francia, Derek Hansen, Ben Schooley, Matthew Taylor, Shydra Murray, Greg Snow

This paper explores the rising concern of utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) in spear phishing message generation, and their performance compared to human-authored counterparts. Our pilot study compares the effectiveness of smishing (SMS phishing) messages created by GPT-4 and human authors, which have been personalized to willing targets. The targets assessed the messages in a modified ranked-order experiment using a novel methodology we call TRAPD (Threshold Ranking Approach for Personalized Deception). Specifically, targets provide personal information (job title and location, hobby, item purchased online), spear smishing messages are created using this information by humans and GPT-4, targets are invited back to rank-order 12 messages from most to least convincing (and identify which they would click on), and then asked questions about why they ranked messages the way they did. They also guess which messages are created by an LLM and their reasoning. Results from 25 targets show that LLM-generated messages are most often perceived as more convincing than those authored by humans, with messages related to jobs being the most convincing. We characterize different criteria used when assessing the authenticity of messages including word choice, style, and personal relevance. Results also show that targets were unable to identify whether the messages was AI-generated or human-authored and struggled to identify criteria to use in order to make this distinction. This study aims to highlight the urgent need for further research and improved countermeasures against personalized AI-enabled social engineering attacks.

Read more

6/21/2024