Assessing Economic Viability: A Comparative Analysis of Total Cost of Ownership for Domain-Adapted Large Language Models versus State-of-the-art Counterparts in Chip Design Coding Assistance

Read original: arXiv:2404.08850 - Published 5/29/2024 by Amit Sharma, Teodor-Dumitru Ene, Kishor Kunal, Mingjie Liu, Zafar Hasan, Haoxing Ren

💬

Overview

This paper compares the total cost of ownership (TCO) and performance of domain-adapted large language models (LLMs) versus state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs for coding assistance in chip design tasks.
The study examines a domain-adaptive LLM called ChipNeMo against two leading LLMs, Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT-4 Turbo, to assess their effectiveness and cost-efficiency for chip design coding.
The research aims to provide stakeholders with critical information to select the most economically viable and performance-efficient solutions for their specific needs.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the costs and capabilities of different large language models (LLMs) that can be used to help with coding for chip design. LLMs are powerful AI models that can understand and generate human-like text. The researchers compared a specialized LLM called ChipNeMo against two well-known LLMs, Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT-4 Turbo, to see which one works best and is the most cost-effective for chip design coding tasks.

The key findings are that the specialized ChipNeMo model performs better and costs 90-95% less to use than the general-purpose LLMs. This makes ChipNeMo a very attractive option for organizations that need a lot of coding support powered by LLMs, as the cost savings become even more significant as the usage scales up. The researchers hope this information will help companies choose the right LLM solution for their specific chip design needs.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comparative analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) and performance between a domain-adapted large language model (LLM) called ChipNeMo and two state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs: Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT-4 Turbo. The focus is on evaluating the efficacy of these models for tasks related to coding assistance in chip design.

The researchers conducted a detailed assessment of the accuracy, training methodologies, and operational expenditures of the three LLMs. Their results demonstrate the benefits of employing domain-adapted models like ChipNeMo, which show improved performance at significantly reduced costs compared to general-purpose LLMs. Specifically, the study reveals that ChipNeMo can decrease TCO by approximately 90%-95%, with the cost advantages becoming increasingly evident as the deployment scale expands.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed comparison of the TCO and performance of domain-adapted and SoTA LLMs for chip design coding tasks. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research worth considering:

The study focuses on a specific domain (chip design) and may not fully capture the broader implications for other application areas of LLMs. Further research could explore the generalizability of the findings to other domains.
The analysis is based on a limited set of LLM models, and the inclusion of additional models, such as JetMOE, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the landscape.
While the cost advantages of ChipNeMo are compelling, the paper does not delve into the potential trade-offs or limitations of the domain-adapted approach, which could be an area for further investigation.

Overall, the research offers valuable insights for stakeholders seeking to optimize their LLM-powered coding assistance solutions for chip design, but continued exploration and a broader perspective would further strengthen the findings.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling case for the use of domain-adapted large language models, such as ChipNeMo, in chip design coding tasks. The study's findings demonstrate that these specialized LLMs can significantly outperform state-of-the-art general-purpose models in terms of both accuracy and cost-efficiency, with potential TCO reductions of up to 95%.

As organizations increasingly rely on LLMs to enhance their coding capabilities, the insights provided by this research can help stakeholders make informed decisions about the most suitable and economically viable solutions for their specific needs. The growing importance of domain adaptation in the LLM landscape highlights the potential for further advancements and tailored models to drive efficiency and performance in various industries and applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Assessing Economic Viability: A Comparative Analysis of Total Cost of Ownership for Domain-Adapted Large Language Models versus State-of-the-art Counterparts in Chip Design Coding Assistance

Amit Sharma, Teodor-Dumitru Ene, Kishor Kunal, Mingjie Liu, Zafar Hasan, Haoxing Ren

This paper presents a comparative analysis of total cost of ownership (TCO) and performance between domain-adapted large language models (LLM) and state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs , with a particular emphasis on tasks related to coding assistance for chip design. We examine the TCO and performance metrics of a domain-adaptive LLM, ChipNeMo, against two leading LLMs, Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT-4 Turbo, to assess their efficacy in chip design coding generation. Through a detailed evaluation of the accuracy of the model, training methodologies, and operational expenditures, this study aims to provide stakeholders with critical information to select the most economically viable and performance-efficient solutions for their specific needs. Our results underscore the benefits of employing domain-adapted models, such as ChipNeMo, that demonstrate improved performance at significantly reduced costs compared to their general-purpose counterparts. In particular, we reveal the potential of domain-adapted LLMs to decrease TCO by approximately 90%-95%, with the cost advantages becoming increasingly evident as the deployment scale expands. With expansion of deployment, the cost benefits of ChipNeMo become more pronounced, making domain-adaptive LLMs an attractive option for organizations with substantial coding needs supported by LLMs

5/29/2024

🏋️

ChipNeMo: Domain-Adapted LLMs for Chip Design

Mingjie Liu, Teodor-Dumitru Ene, Robert Kirby, Chris Cheng, Nathaniel Pinckney, Rongjian Liang, Jonah Alben, Himyanshu Anand, Sanmitra Banerjee, Ismet Bayraktaroglu, Bonita Bhaskaran, Bryan Catanzaro, Arjun Chaudhuri, Sharon Clay, Bill Dally, Laura Dang, Parikshit Deshpande, Siddhanth Dhodhi, Sameer Halepete, Eric Hill, Jiashang Hu, Sumit Jain, Ankit Jindal, Brucek Khailany, George Kokai, Kishor Kunal, Xiaowei Li, Charley Lind, Hao Liu, Stuart Oberman, Sujeet Omar, Ghasem Pasandi, Sreedhar Pratty, Jonathan Raiman, Ambar Sarkar, Zhengjiang Shao, Hanfei Sun, Pratik P Suthar, Varun Tej, Walker Turner, Kaizhe Xu, Haoxing Ren

ChipNeMo aims to explore the applications of large language models (LLMs) for industrial chip design. Instead of directly deploying off-the-shelf commercial or open-source LLMs, we instead adopt the following domain adaptation techniques: domain-adaptive tokenization, domain-adaptive continued pretraining, model alignment with domain-specific instructions, and domain-adapted retrieval models. We evaluate these methods on three selected LLM applications for chip design: an engineering assistant chatbot, EDA script generation, and bug summarization and analysis. Our evaluations demonstrate that domain-adaptive pretraining of language models, can lead to superior performance in domain related downstream tasks compared to their base LLaMA2 counterparts, without degradations in generic capabilities. In particular, our largest model, ChipNeMo-70B, outperforms the highly capable GPT-4 on two of our use cases, namely engineering assistant chatbot and EDA scripts generation, while exhibiting competitive performance on bug summarization and analysis. These results underscore the potential of domain-specific customization for enhancing the effectiveness of large language models in specialized applications.

4/8/2024

💬

ChipExpert: The Open-Source Integrated-Circuit-Design-Specific Large Language Model

Ning Xu, Zhaoyang Zhang, Lei Qi, Wensuo Wang, Chao Zhang, Zihao Ren, Huaiyuan Zhang, Xin Cheng, Yanqi Zhang, Zhichao Liu, Qingwen Wei, Shiyang Wu, Lanlan Yang, Qianfeng Lu, Yiqun Ma, Mengyao Zhao, Junbo Liu, Yufan Song, Xin Geng, Jun Yang

The field of integrated circuit (IC) design is highly specialized, presenting significant barriers to entry and research and development challenges. Although large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in various domains, existing LLMs often fail to meet the specific needs of students, engineers, and researchers. Consequently, the potential of LLMs in the IC design domain remains largely unexplored. To address these issues, we introduce ChipExpert, the first open-source, instructional LLM specifically tailored for the IC design field. ChipExpert is trained on one of the current best open-source base model (Llama-3 8B). The entire training process encompasses several key stages, including data preparation, continue pre-training, instruction-guided supervised fine-tuning, preference alignment, and evaluation. In the data preparation stage, we construct multiple high-quality custom datasets through manual selection and data synthesis techniques. In the subsequent two stages, ChipExpert acquires a vast amount of IC design knowledge and learns how to respond to user queries professionally. ChipExpert also undergoes an alignment phase, using Direct Preference Optimization, to achieve a high standard of ethical performance. Finally, to mitigate the hallucinations of ChipExpert, we have developed a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, based on the IC design knowledge base. We also released the first IC design benchmark ChipICD-Bench, to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs across multiple IC design sub-domains. Through comprehensive experiments conducted on this benchmark, ChipExpert demonstrated a high level of expertise in IC design knowledge Question-and-Answer tasks.

8/6/2024

Evaluating Open Language Models Across Task Types, Application Domains, and Reasoning Types: An In-Depth Experimental Analysis

Neelabh Sinha, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha

The rapid rise of Language Models (LMs) has expanded their use in several applications. Yet, due to constraints of model size, associated cost, or proprietary restrictions, utilizing state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs is not always feasible. With open, smaller LMs emerging, more applications can leverage their capabilities, but selecting the right LM can be challenging as smaller LMs don't perform well universally. This work tries to bridge this gap by proposing a framework to experimentally evaluate small, open LMs in practical settings through measuring semantic correctness of outputs across three practical aspects: task types, application domains and reasoning types, using diverse prompt styles. It also conducts an in-depth comparison of 10 small, open LMs to identify best LM and prompt style depending on specific application requirement using the proposed framework. We also show that if selected appropriately, they can outperform SOTA LLMs like DeepSeek-v2, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and even compete with GPT-4o.

9/2/2024