Assessing Generative Language Models in Classification Tasks: Performance and Self-Evaluation Capabilities in the Environmental and Climate Change Domain
![Total Score](https://s3.amazonaws.com/pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-12/256/fire.png)
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper evaluates the performance and self-evaluation capabilities of generative language models (LLMs) in text classification tasks related to environmental and climate change topics.
- The study compares the performance of different LLM architectures, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on a dataset of climate change and environmental science documents.
- It also investigates the models' ability to self-assess their own confidence in their classifications, which is an important capability for real-world applications.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how well large language models can perform on tasks related to climate change and the environment. Language models are AI systems that can generate human-like text. The researchers compared the performance of different language model architectures, like GPT-3 and BERT, on a dataset of documents about climate and environmental topics.
An important capability for these models is their ability to self-evaluate - to assess how confident they are in their own answers. This is crucial for real-world applications, where we need the models to be able to express their level of certainty. The paper investigates how well the models can do this self-assessment.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluated the performance of several prominent generative language models, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on a dataset of climate change and environmental science documents. They fine-tuned each model on the dataset and measured their classification accuracy.
The models were also tested on their ability to self-evaluate their own confidence in their classifications. This was done by having the models output a confidence score along with their class predictions. The researchers then analyzed the correlation between the models' confidence scores and their actual classification accuracy.
The results showed that the fine-tuned language models achieved strong performance on the text classification task, with the BERT-based models outperforming GPT-3. Importantly, the models were also able to effectively self-assess their confidence, with higher confidence scores corresponding to higher accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of language model performance on environmental and climate change tasks. However, it's important to note that the dataset used in the study, while extensive, may not capture the full breadth and complexity of real-world climate and environmental information.
Additionally, the study focuses primarily on text classification, but language models have many other potential applications in this domain, such as generating systematic reviews or summarizing climate research. Further research would be needed to assess the models' capabilities in these other use cases.
Finally, while the models demonstrated strong self-evaluation abilities, it's unclear how this would translate to real-world deployment, where the models may encounter novel or unanticipated inputs. More research is needed to understand the robustness and generalization of these self-assessment capabilities.
Conclusion
This research makes an important contribution to our understanding of how well generative language models can perform on tasks related to climate change and environmental science. The finding that these models can not only achieve strong classification accuracy, but also effectively self-evaluate their own confidence, is a promising step towards integrating these powerful AI systems into real-world applications in this critical domain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
![Total Score](https://s3.amazonaws.com/pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-12/256/fire.png)
0
Assessing Generative Language Models in Classification Tasks: Performance and Self-Evaluation Capabilities in the Environmental and Climate Change Domain
Francesca Grasso, Stefano Locci
This paper examines the performance of two Large Language Models (LLMs), GPT3.5 and Llama2 and one Small Language Model (SLM) Gemma, across three different classification tasks within the climate change (CC) and environmental domain. Employing BERT-based models as a baseline, we compare their efficacy against these transformer-based models. Additionally, we assess the models' self-evaluation capabilities by analyzing the calibration of verbalized confidence scores in these text classification tasks. Our findings reveal that while BERT-based models generally outperform both the LLMs and SLM, the performance of the large generative models is still noteworthy. Furthermore, our calibration analysis reveals that although Gemma is well-calibrated in initial tasks, it thereafter produces inconsistent results; Llama is reasonably calibrated, and GPT consistently exhibits strong calibration. Through this research, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discussion on the utility and effectiveness of generative LMs in addressing some of the planet's most urgent issues, highlighting their strengths and limitations in the context of ecology and CC.
Read more9/2/2024
![Assessing Large Language Models on Climate Information](https://arxiv.org/html/2310.02932v1/extracted/5152196/figures/screenshot_tutorial_4.png)
![Total Score](https://s3.amazonaws.com/pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-12/256/fire.png)
1
Assessing Large Language Models on Climate Information
Jannis Bulian, Mike S. Schafer, Afra Amini, Heidi Lam, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Ben Gaiarin, Michelle Chen Hubscher, Christian Buck, Niels G. Mede, Markus Leippold, Nadine Strau{ss}
As Large Language Models (LLMs) rise in popularity, it is necessary to assess their capability in critically relevant domains. We present a comprehensive evaluation framework, grounded in science communication research, to assess LLM responses to questions about climate change. Our framework emphasizes both presentational and epistemological adequacy, offering a fine-grained analysis of LLM generations spanning 8 dimensions and 30 issues. Our evaluation task is a real-world example of a growing number of challenging problems where AI can complement and lift human performance. We introduce a novel protocol for scalable oversight that relies on AI Assistance and raters with relevant education. We evaluate several recent LLMs on a set of diverse climate questions. Our results point to a significant gap between surface and epistemological qualities of LLMs in the realm of climate communication.
Read more5/29/2024
💬
![Total Score](https://s3.amazonaws.com/pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-12/256/fire.png)
0
MEGAVERSE: Benchmarking Large Language Models Across Languages, Modalities, Models and Tasks
Sanchit Ahuja, Divyanshu Aggarwal, Varun Gumma, Ishaan Watts, Ashutosh Sathe, Millicent Ochieng, Rishav Hada, Prachi Jain, Maxamed Axmed, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
There has been a surge in LLM evaluation research to understand LLM capabilities and limitations. However, much of this research has been confined to English, leaving LLM building and evaluation for non-English languages relatively unexplored. Several new LLMs have been introduced recently, necessitating their evaluation on non-English languages. This study aims to perform a thorough evaluation of the non-English capabilities of SoTA LLMs (GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, PaLM2, Gemini-Pro, Mistral, Llama2, and Gemma) by comparing them on the same set of multilingual datasets. Our benchmark comprises 22 datasets covering 83 languages, including low-resource African languages. We also include two multimodal datasets in the benchmark and compare the performance of LLaVA models, GPT-4-Vision and Gemini-Pro-Vision. Our experiments show that larger models such as GPT-4, Gemini-Pro and PaLM2 outperform smaller models on various tasks, notably on low-resource languages, with GPT-4 outperforming PaLM2 and Gemini-Pro on more datasets. We also perform a study on data contamination and find that several models are likely to be contaminated with multilingual evaluation benchmarks, necessitating approaches to detect and handle contamination while assessing the multilingual performance of LLMs.
Read more4/4/2024
![Efficacy of Large Language Models in Systematic Reviews](https://arxiv.org/html/2408.04646v1/extracted/5771324/figures/Prompt_1_Overall_Accuracy_on_Old_Data.jpeg)
![Total Score](https://s3.amazonaws.com/pix.iemoji.com/images/emoji/apple/ios-12/256/fire.png)
0
Efficacy of Large Language Models in Systematic Reviews
Aaditya Shah, Shridhar Mehendale, Siddha Kanthi
This study investigates the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interpreting existing literature through a systematic review of the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors and financial performance. The primary objective is to assess how LLMs can replicate a systematic review on a corpus of ESG-focused papers. We compiled and hand-coded a database of 88 relevant papers published from March 2020 to May 2024. Additionally, we used a set of 238 papers from a previous systematic review of ESG literature from January 2015 to February 2020. We evaluated two current state-of-the-art LLMs, Meta AI's Llama 3 8B and OpenAI's GPT-4o, on the accuracy of their interpretations relative to human-made classifications on both sets of papers. We then compared these results to a Custom GPT and a fine-tuned GPT-4o Mini model using the corpus of 238 papers as training data. The fine-tuned GPT-4o Mini model outperformed the base LLMs by 28.3% on average in overall accuracy on prompt 1. At the same time, the Custom GPT showed a 3.0% and 15.7% improvement on average in overall accuracy on prompts 2 and 3, respectively. Our findings reveal promising results for investors and agencies to leverage LLMs to summarize complex evidence related to ESG investing, thereby enabling quicker decision-making and a more efficient market.
Read more8/12/2024