Assessing the Role of Lexical Semantics in Cross-lingual Transfer through Controlled Manipulations

Read original: arXiv:2408.07599 - Published 8/15/2024 by Roy Ilani, Taelin Karidi, Omri Abend
Total Score

0

Assessing the Role of Lexical Semantics in Cross-lingual Transfer through Controlled Manipulations

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the role of lexical semantics in cross-lingual transfer learning for language models.
  • The researchers conducted controlled experiments to assess how changes to the lexical semantics of words impact the performance of cross-lingual transfer.
  • They explored this by manipulating word embeddings and evaluating the transfer performance on various downstream tasks.

Plain English Explanation

When training language models on one language, we often want to apply that knowledge to other languages as well. This is known as cross-lingual transfer. The key question this paper explores is: how important are the meanings of individual words (the lexical semantics) in enabling this cross-lingual transfer?

To investigate this, the researchers took language models trained on one language and made controlled changes to the meanings of words in the models. They then tested how well the modified models could still perform tasks in a different language. By seeing how the performance changed, they were able to assess the role that word meanings play in cross-lingual transfer.

The main finding is that lexical semantics are quite important - when the researchers altered the word meanings, it significantly degraded the cross-lingual transfer performance. This suggests that the ability to map word meanings across languages is a critical component of effective cross-lingual language model transfer.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by noting that while cross-lingual transfer learning has been widely explored, the specific role of lexical semantics in enabling this transfer is not well understood. To investigate this, the researchers conducted a series of controlled experiments.

They started with language models trained on English data and then applied controlled manipulations to the word embeddings. This allowed them to systematically modify the lexical semantics of the words while keeping other factors constant. They then evaluated the transfer performance of these modified models on various tasks in other languages, such as part-of-speech tagging and dependency parsing.

The key results show that altering the lexical semantics significantly degrades cross-lingual transfer performance. When the researchers made changes to the word meanings, it led to notable drops in the models' ability to perform well on the target language tasks. This provides strong evidence that the preservation of lexical semantics is crucial for enabling effective cross-lingual transfer.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous and well-designed set of experiments to isolate the role of lexical semantics in cross-lingual transfer. By using controlled manipulations of the word embeddings, the researchers were able to draw clear conclusions about the importance of preserving word meanings during the transfer process.

One potential limitation is that the experiments were conducted on a relatively small set of languages (English, German, and Russian). It would be valuable to see if the findings generalize to a wider range of language pairs, including those that are more distant or have greater structural differences.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the specific mechanisms by which lexical semantics enable cross-lingual transfer. Further research could investigate the cognitive and linguistic principles underlying this phenomenon in more depth.

Overall, this work makes an important contribution to our understanding of the key factors that govern the success of cross-lingual language model transfer. The insights provided can help guide the development of more effective cross-lingual NLP systems.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the crucial role that lexical semantics play in enabling effective cross-lingual transfer for language models. Through a series of controlled experiments, the researchers show that preserving the meanings of individual words is essential for maintaining high performance when applying a model trained on one language to tasks in another language.

These findings have significant implications for the field of cross-lingual NLP. They suggest that efforts to improve cross-lingual transfer should focus not only on architectural innovations, but also on better modeling and preservation of lexical semantics across languages. This knowledge can help guide the development of more robust and versatile cross-lingual language technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Assessing the Role of Lexical Semantics in Cross-lingual Transfer through Controlled Manipulations
Total Score

0

Assessing the Role of Lexical Semantics in Cross-lingual Transfer through Controlled Manipulations

Roy Ilani, Taelin Karidi, Omri Abend

While cross-linguistic model transfer is effective in many settings, there is still limited understanding of the conditions under which it works. In this paper, we focus on assessing the role of lexical semantics in cross-lingual transfer, as we compare its impact to that of other language properties. Examining each language property individually, we systematically analyze how differences between English and a target language influence the capacity to align the language with an English pretrained representation space. We do so by artificially manipulating the English sentences in ways that mimic specific characteristics of the target language, and reporting the effect of each manipulation on the quality of alignment with the representation space. We show that while properties such as the script or word order only have a limited impact on alignment quality, the degree of lexical matching between the two languages, which we define using a measure of translation entropy, greatly affects it.

Read more

8/15/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Incorporating Lexical and Syntactic Knowledge for Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Transfer

Jianyu Zheng, Fengfei Fan, Jianquan Li

Unsupervised cross-lingual transfer involves transferring knowledge between languages without explicit supervision. Although numerous studies have been conducted to improve performance in such tasks by focusing on cross-lingual knowledge, particularly lexical and syntactic knowledge, current approaches are limited as they only incorporate syntactic or lexical information. Since each type of information offers unique advantages and no previous attempts have combined both, we attempt to explore the potential of this approach. In this paper, we present a novel framework called Lexicon-Syntax Enhanced Multilingual BERT that combines both lexical and syntactic knowledge. Specifically, we use Multilingual BERT (mBERT) as the base model and employ two techniques to enhance its learning capabilities. The code-switching technique is used to implicitly teach the model lexical alignment information, while a syntactic-based graph attention network is designed to help the model encode syntactic structure. To integrate both types of knowledge, we input code-switched sequences into both the syntactic module and the mBERT base model simultaneously. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate this framework can consistently outperform all baselines of zero-shot cross-lingual transfer, with the gains of 1.0~3.7 points on text classification, named entity recognition (ner), and semantic parsing tasks. Keywords:cross-lingual transfer, lexicon, syntax, code-switching, graph attention network

Read more

4/26/2024

Total Score

0

Linear Cross-Lingual Mapping of Sentence Embeddings

Oleg Vasilyev, Fumika Isono, John Bohannon

Semantics of a sentence is defined with much less ambiguity than semantics of a single word, and we assume that it should be better preserved by translation to another language. If multilingual sentence embeddings intend to represent sentence semantics, then the similarity between embeddings of any two sentences must be invariant with respect to translation. Based on this suggestion, we consider a simple linear cross-lingual mapping as a possible improvement of the multilingual embeddings. We also consider deviation from orthogonality conditions as a measure of deficiency of the embeddings.

Read more

6/28/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Measuring Cross-lingual Transfer in Bytes

Leandro Rodrigues de Souza, Thales Sales Almeida, Roberto Lotufo, Rodrigo Nogueira

Multilingual pretraining has been a successful solution to the challenges posed by the lack of resources for languages. These models can transfer knowledge to target languages with minimal or no examples. Recent research suggests that monolingual models also have a similar capability, but the mechanisms behind this transfer remain unclear. Some studies have explored factors like language contamination and syntactic similarity. An emerging line of research suggests that the representations learned by language models contain two components: a language-specific and a language-agnostic component. The latter is responsible for transferring a more universal knowledge. However, there is a lack of comprehensive exploration of these properties across diverse target languages. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment inspired by the work on the Scaling Laws for Transfer. We measured the amount of data transferred from a source language to a target language and found that models initialized from diverse languages perform similarly to a target language in a cross-lingual setting. This was surprising because the amount of data transferred to 10 diverse target languages, such as Spanish, Korean, and Finnish, was quite similar. We also found evidence that this transfer is not related to language contamination or language proximity, which strengthens the hypothesis that the model also relies on language-agnostic knowledge. Our experiments have opened up new possibilities for measuring how much data represents the language-agnostic representations learned during pretraining.

Read more

4/15/2024