Asymmetric Graph Error Control with Low Complexity in Causal Bandits
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes an approach for asymmetric graph error control in causal bandits with low computational complexity.
- The key ideas are using a linear structural equation model, mutual information-based graph identification, and an upper confidence bound algorithm.
- The method aims to efficiently learn the causal graph structure while minimizing regret in a causal bandit problem.
Plain English Explanation
In this research, the authors tackle the problem of learning the causal relationships between different variables in a complex system, known as the "causal graph," while also making good decisions based on this information. This is particularly relevant for "causal bandit" problems, where you have to choose actions that lead to the best outcomes, but you don't know the underlying causal structure ahead of time.
The main innovation is an approach that can efficiently learn the causal graph structure [link to "causal graph identification"] while also minimizing the "regret" or mistakes made in choosing actions [link to "upper confidence bound algorithm"]. This is done by using a [link to "linear structural equation model"] to model the relationships between variables, and then using mutual information to identify the most important connections in the graph.
The key advantage of this method is that it can learn the causal graph structure with low computational complexity, making it practical for real-world applications where quick decision-making is important. By understanding the underlying causal relationships, the system can make better choices and avoid costly mistakes.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an approach for asymmetric graph error control in causal bandits with low computational complexity. At the core of the method is a linear structural equation model that captures the causal relationships between variables in the system.
To learn the causal graph structure, the algorithm uses a mutual information-based graph identification technique. This efficiently identifies the most important connections in the graph by measuring the information shared between variables.
The paper then introduces an upper confidence bound algorithm that leverages the learned causal graph to make decisions in the causal bandit problem. This balances exploration (learning more about the graph) and exploitation (making the best decisions given current knowledge) to minimize regret.
The key innovation is that this approach can learn the causal graph structure with low computational complexity, making it practical for real-world applications that require fast decision-making. By understanding the underlying causal relationships, the system can make better choices and avoid costly mistakes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong technical foundation and a novel approach to the challenging problem of causal graph learning in the context of causal bandits. The use of a linear structural equation model, mutual information-based graph identification, and the upper confidence bound algorithm is well-justified and appears to be an effective solution.
One potential limitation, as acknowledged by the authors, is that the linear structural equation model may not be able to capture all types of causal relationships, particularly non-linear ones. It would be valuable to explore ways to extend the approach to handle more complex causal structures.
Additionally, while the low computational complexity is a key strength, it would be helpful to understand the trade-offs in terms of learning accuracy compared to more computationally intensive methods. Evaluating the approach on a diverse set of benchmark problems could provide more insights into its strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, this research represents a significant contribution to the field of causal bandits and causal graph learning. The proposed method offers an attractive balance of efficiency and effectiveness, which could have important implications for real-world decision-making systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach for asymmetric graph error control in causal bandits that leverages a linear structural equation model, mutual information-based graph identification, and an upper confidence bound algorithm. The key advantage of this method is its ability to learn the causal graph structure with low computational complexity, making it practical for real-world applications that require fast decision-making.
By understanding the underlying causal relationships, the system can make better choices and avoid costly mistakes in the causal bandit problem. While the approach has some limitations in terms of handling non-linear causal structures, it represents a significant contribution to the field of causal bandits and causal graph learning, with the potential to have a meaningful impact on decision-making systems across various domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Asymmetric Graph Error Control with Low Complexity in Causal Bandits
Chen Peng, Di Zhang, Urbashi Mitra
In this paper, the causal bandit problem is investigated, in which the objective is to select an optimal sequence of interventions on nodes in a causal graph. It is assumed that the graph is governed by linear structural equations; it is further assumed that both the causal topology and the distribution of interventions are unknown. By exploiting the causal relationships between the nodes whose signals contribute to the reward, interventions are optimized. First, based on the difference between the two types of graph identification errors (false positives and negatives), a causal graph learning method is proposed, which strongly reduces sample complexity relative to the prior art by learning sub-graphs. Under the assumption of Gaussian exogenous inputs and minimum-mean squared error weight estimation, a new uncertainty bound tailored to the causal bandit problem is derived. This uncertainty bound drives an upper confidence bound based intervention selection to optimize the reward. To cope with non-stationary bandits, a sub-graph change detection mechanism is proposed, with high sample efficiency. Numerical results compare the new methodology to existing schemes and show a substantial performance improvement in both stationary and non-stationary settings. Compared to existing approaches, the proposed scheme takes 67% fewer samples to learn the causal structure and achieves an average reward gain of 85%.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
Read more6/26/2024
🛸
0
Improved Bound for Robust Causal Bandits with Linear Models
Zirui Yan, Arpan Mukherjee, Burak Var{i}c{i}, Ali Tajer
This paper investigates the robustness of causal bandits (CBs) in the face of temporal model fluctuations. This setting deviates from the existing literature's widely-adopted assumption of constant causal models. The focus is on causal systems with linear structural equation models (SEMs). The SEMs and the time-varying pre- and post-interventional statistical models are all unknown and subject to variations over time. The goal is to design a sequence of interventions that incur the smallest cumulative regret compared to an oracle aware of the entire causal model and its fluctuations. A robust CB algorithm is proposed, and its cumulative regret is analyzed by establishing both upper and lower bounds on the regret. It is shown that in a graph with maximum in-degree $d$, length of the largest causal path $L$, and an aggregate model deviation $C$, the regret is upper bounded by $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d^{L-frac{1}{2}}(sqrt{T} + C))$ and lower bounded by $Omega(d^{frac{L}{2}-2}max{sqrt{T}; ,; d^2C})$. The proposed algorithm achieves nearly optimal $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{T})$ regret when $C$ is $o(sqrt{T})$, maintaining sub-linear regret for a broad range of $C$.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Causal Bandits: The Pareto Optimal Frontier of Adaptivity, a Reduction to Linear Bandits, and Limitations around Unknown Marginals
Ziyi Liu, Idan Attias, Daniel M. Roy
In this work, we investigate the problem of adapting to the presence or absence of causal structure in multi-armed bandit problems. In addition to the usual reward signal, we assume the learner has access to additional variables, observed in each round after acting. When these variables $d$-separate the action from the reward, existing work in causal bandits demonstrates that one can achieve strictly better (minimax) rates of regret (Lu et al., 2020). Our goal is to adapt to this favorable conditionally benign structure, if it is present in the environment, while simultaneously recovering worst-case minimax regret, if it is not. Notably, the learner has no prior knowledge of whether the favorable structure holds. In this paper, we establish the Pareto optimal frontier of adaptive rates. We prove upper and matching lower bounds on the possible trade-offs in the performance of learning in conditionally benign and arbitrary environments, resolving an open question raised by Bilodeau et al. (2022). Furthermore, we are the first to obtain instance-dependent bounds for causal bandits, by reducing the problem to the linear bandit setting. Finally, we examine the common assumption that the marginal distributions of the post-action contexts are known and show that a nontrivial estimate is necessary for better-than-worst-case minimax rates.
Read more7/2/2024