Atomic Self-Consistency for Better Long Form Generations

Read original: arXiv:2405.13131 - Published 5/24/2024 by Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Yukun Huang, Bhuwan Dhingra
Total Score

0

🗣️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces Atomic Self-Consistency (ASC), a technique to improve the recall of relevant information in long-form responses generated by large language models (LLMs).
  • ASC builds on recent work like Universal Self-Consistency (USC), which uses multiple stochastic samples from an LLM to enhance response quality.
  • Unlike USC, which selects the best single generation, ASC picks authentic subparts from the samples and merges them into a superior composite answer.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful tools that can generate human-like text on a variety of topics. However, these models can sometimes produce information that is incorrect or not fully relevant to the question asked - a phenomenon known as "hallucination." Recent research has aimed to address this issue by filtering out hallucinations, thereby improving the precision of the information in LLM responses.

This paper introduces a new technique called Atomic Self-Consistency (ASC) that takes a different approach to improving the quality of LLM responses. Instead of just selecting the "best" single response, ASC looks at multiple sample responses generated by the model and identifies the most relevant and accurate subparts from each one. It then combines these subparts into a single, more comprehensive and reliable answer.

The key insight behind ASC is that while a single sample response may have some flaws or missing information, the collective set of samples is likely to contain the necessary pieces to assemble a high-quality, consistent response. By selectively combining these pieces, ASC can produce answers that are more complete and accurate than any individual sample.

The authors demonstrate through extensive experiments that ASC outperforms previous approaches like Universal Self-Consistency (USC) on a variety of factual and open-ended question-answering datasets. This suggests that ASC is a promising technique for enhancing the long-form generation capabilities of LLMs.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Atomic Self-Consistency (ASC), a novel technique for improving the recall of relevant information in long-form responses generated by large language models (LLMs). ASC builds on recent work like Universal Self-Consistency (USC), which uses multiple stochastic samples from an LLM to enhance response quality.

Unlike USC, which focuses on selecting the best single generation, ASC picks authentic subparts from the samples and merges them into a superior composite answer. The key innovation of ASC is its ability to identify and combine the most relevant and accurate pieces of information across multiple sample responses, rather than simply choosing the "best" single response.

Through extensive experiments and ablations on datasets like ASQA, QAMPARI, QUEST, and ELI5, the authors demonstrate that this merging of relevant subparts significantly outperforms the single-sample selection approach of USC. The results show that ASC achieves substantial gains over USC on both factual and open-ended question-answering tasks when used with large language models like ChatGPT and LLaMA2.

The authors' analysis also suggests that there is untapped potential for further enhancing long-form generations by leveraging the ensemble of multiple samples, as demonstrated by the RELIC and Small Language Model Can Self-Correct works.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the quality of long-form responses generated by large language models. By selectively combining the most relevant and accurate subparts from multiple sample responses, ASC appears to outperform previous techniques like USC that focus on selecting the "best" single response.

One potential limitation of the ASC approach is the complexity of the merging process, which may introduce additional computational overhead or engineering challenges compared to simpler selection-based methods. The authors do not provide detailed information on the computational efficiency or scalability of their approach.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for biases or errors to be amplified when merging information from multiple samples. It would be valuable to investigate how ASC performs in cases where the samples contain conflicting or erroneous information, and whether the merging process can reliably identify and resolve such discrepancies.

Another area for further research could be the integration of ASC with other techniques for improving long-form generation, such as the automated information comparison approach or the self-correction capabilities explored in other works. Combining multiple complementary techniques may lead to even greater improvements in the consistency and reliability of LLM responses.

Overall, the ASC approach represents an interesting and potentially impactful contribution to the field of long-form generation using large language models. While the paper raises some interesting questions and areas for further exploration, the demonstrated performance gains on a variety of datasets suggest that ASC is a promising direction for enhancing the capabilities of these powerful language models.

Conclusion

This paper introduces Atomic Self-Consistency (ASC), a novel technique for improving the recall of relevant information in long-form responses generated by large language models (LLMs). ASC builds on recent work in this area by selectively combining the most accurate and relevant subparts from multiple sample responses, rather than simply selecting the "best" single response.

Through extensive experimentation, the authors show that the ASC approach significantly outperforms previous techniques like Universal Self-Consistency (USC) on a range of factual and open-ended question-answering tasks. This suggests that ASC is a promising direction for enhancing the consistency and reliability of long-form generation from LLMs.

While the paper raises some interesting questions about the complexity and potential biases of the ASC merging process, the demonstrated performance gains indicate that this technique has the potential to meaningfully improve the quality and usefulness of LLM-generated text. As large language models continue to advance, techniques like ASC will be increasingly important for ensuring the trustworthiness and reliability of their outputs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🗣️

Total Score

0

Atomic Self-Consistency for Better Long Form Generations

Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Yukun Huang, Bhuwan Dhingra

Recent work has aimed to improve LLM generations by filtering out hallucinations, thereby improving the precision of the information in responses. Correctness of a long-form response, however, also depends on the recall of multiple pieces of information relevant to the question. In this paper, we introduce Atomic Self-Consistency (ASC), a technique for improving the recall of relevant information in an LLM response. ASC follows recent work, Universal Self-Consistency (USC) in using multiple stochastic samples from an LLM to improve the long-form response. Unlike USC which only focuses on selecting the best single generation, ASC picks authentic subparts from the samples and merges them into a superior composite answer. Through extensive experiments and ablations, we show that merging relevant subparts of multiple samples performs significantly better than picking a single sample. ASC demonstrates significant gains over USC on multiple factoids and open-ended QA datasets - ASQA, QAMPARI, QUEST, ELI5 with ChatGPT and Llama2. Our analysis also reveals untapped potential for enhancing long-form generations using approach of merging multiple samples.

Read more

5/24/2024

Dynamic Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling
Total Score

0

Dynamic Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling

Guangya Wan, Yuqi Wu, Jie Chen, Sheng Li

Self-Consistency (SC) is a widely used method to mitigate hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling the LLM multiple times and outputting the most frequent solution. Despite its benefits, SC results in significant computational costs proportional to the number of samples generated. Previous early-stopping approaches, such as Early Stopping Self Consistency and Adaptive Consistency, have aimed to reduce these costs by considering output consistency, but they do not analyze the quality of the reasoning paths (RPs) themselves. To address this issue, we propose Reasoning-Aware Self-Consistency (RASC), an innovative early-stopping framework that dynamically adjusts the number of sample generations by considering both the output answer and the RPs from Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting. RASC assigns confidence scores sequentially to the generated samples, stops when certain criteria are met, and then employs weighted majority voting to optimize sample usage and enhance answer reliability. We comprehensively test RASC with multiple LLMs across varied QA datasets. RASC outperformed existing methods and significantly reduces sample usage by an average of 80% while maintaining or improving accuracy up to 5% compared to the original SC

Read more

9/2/2024

When is the consistent prediction likely to be a correct prediction?
Total Score

0

When is the consistent prediction likely to be a correct prediction?

Alex Nguyen, Dheeraj Mekala, Chengyu Dong, Jingbo Shang

Self-consistency (Wang et al., 2023) suggests that the most consistent answer obtained through large language models (LLMs) is more likely to be correct. In this paper, we challenge this argument and propose a nuanced correction. Our observations indicate that consistent answers derived through more computation i.e. longer reasoning texts, rather than simply the most consistent answer across all outputs, are more likely to be correct. This is predominantly because we demonstrate that LLMs can autonomously produce chain-of-thought (CoT) style reasoning with no custom prompts merely while generating longer responses, which lead to consistent predictions that are more accurate. In the zero-shot setting, by sampling Mixtral-8x7B model multiple times and considering longer responses, we achieve 86% of its self-consistency performance obtained through zero-shot CoT prompting on the GSM8K and MultiArith datasets. Finally, we demonstrate that the probability of LLMs generating a longer response is quite low, highlighting the need for decoding strategies conditioned on output length.

Read more

7/9/2024

Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning
Total Score

0

Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning

Xinglin Wang, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Peiwen Yuan, Yueqi Zhang, Boyuan Pan, Heda Wang, Yao Hu, Kan Li

Self-consistency (SC), a widely used decoding strategy for chain-of-thought reasoning, shows significant gains across various multi-step reasoning tasks but comes with a high cost due to multiple sampling with the preset size. Its variants, Adaptive self-consistency (ASC) and Early-stopping self-consistency (ESC), dynamically adjust the number of samples based on the posterior distribution of a set of pre-samples, reducing the cost of SC with minimal impact on performance. Both methods, however, do not exploit the prior information about question difficulty. It often results in unnecessary repeated sampling for easy questions that could be accurately answered with just one attempt, wasting resources. To tackle this problem, we propose Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency (DSC), which leverages the difficulty information from both prior and posterior perspectives to adaptively allocate inference resources, further reducing the cost of SC. To demonstrate the effectiveness of DSC, we conduct extensive experiments on three popular categories of reasoning tasks: arithmetic, commonsense and symbolic reasoning on six benchmarks. The empirical results show that DSC consistently surpasses the strong baseline ASC and ESC in terms of costs by a significant margin, while attaining comparable performances.

Read more

8/27/2024