Attacks on Third-Party APIs of Large Language Models

2404.16891

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/29/2024 by Wanru Zhao, Vidit Khazanchi, Haodi Xing, Xuanli He, Qiongkai Xu, Nicholas Donald Lane

💬

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) services have recently begun offering a plugin ecosystem to interact with third-party API services. This innovation enhances the capabilities of LLMs, but it also introduces risks, as these plugins developed by various third parties cannot be easily trusted. This paper proposes a new attacking framework to examine security and safety vulnerabilities within LLM platforms that incorporate third-party services. Applying our framework specifically to widely used LLMs, we identify real-world malicious attacks across various domains on third-party APIs that can imperceptibly modify LLM outputs. The paper discusses the unique challenges posed by third-party API integration and offers strategic possibilities to improve the security and safety of LLM ecosystems moving forward. Our code is released at https://github.com/vk0812/Third-Party-Attacks-on-LLMs.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) now offer plugin ecosystems to interact with third-party APIs
  • This enhances LLM capabilities, but also introduces security risks as third-party plugins may not be trustworthy
  • This paper proposes a framework to examine security and safety vulnerabilities in LLM platforms that use third-party services
  • The framework is applied to widely used LLMs, revealing real-world malicious attacks on third-party APIs that can subtly modify LLM outputs

Plain English Explanation

Large language models are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. Recently, these models have started to offer "plugin" capabilities, which allow them to connect to and use various third-party online services and APIs.

This plugin functionality expands what the language models can do, but it also introduces new security risks. The third-party plugins are developed by many different companies and individuals, so it's hard to know if they can be fully trusted. The paper describes a new approach to investigate and uncover vulnerabilities in language models that rely on these external services.

The researchers applied their security framework to some of the most widely used language models. They found real-world examples of attacks that could secretly manipulate the output of the language models by misusing the third-party APIs they're connected to. This highlights the unique challenges and risks introduced by integrating language models with external services.

The paper discusses strategies that could help improve the security and safety of language model ecosystems going forward. Overall, it shows how the increasing power and capabilities of language models come with new challenges that need to be carefully addressed.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel "attacking framework" to systematically examine the security and safety vulnerabilities that arise when large language models (LLMs) are integrated with third-party API services. The framework involves:

  1. Identifying potential attack surfaces by mapping the interactions between the LLM and third-party APIs.
  2. Designing realistic attack scenarios across different domains, like image generation, code generation, and language understanding.
  3. Implementing proof-of-concept attacks to demonstrate the real-world feasibility and impact of such threats.

Applying this framework to widely-used commercial and open-source LLMs, the researchers uncovered several concerning vulnerabilities. They were able to carry out malicious attacks that could imperceptibly modify the outputs of these LLMs by exploiting flaws in the third-party API integrations.

The paper discusses the unique security challenges posed by the growing trend of third-party API integration in the LLM ecosystem. It highlights the difficulties in verifying the trustworthiness of these external services and the potential for attackers to leverage them to subvert the intended behavior of these powerful language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling and well-executed investigation into a critical security issue surrounding the emerging ecosystem of large language models integrated with third-party services. The proposed attacking framework offers a structured approach to uncovering vulnerabilities that could have significant real-world implications.

However, the paper acknowledges that the scope of the research is limited to a subset of LLMs and attack scenarios. There may be other types of vulnerabilities or attack vectors that were not covered. Additionally, the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed mitigation strategies are not fully evaluated.

It's also worth considering the broader implications of this research. As language models become more ubiquitous and integrated into various applications, the risks identified in this paper could have far-reaching consequences for data privacy, content integrity, and the overall trustworthiness of AI systems. Further research and collaboration between researchers, developers, and policymakers may be necessary to address these challenges holistically.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution to the growing body of research examining the security and safety of large language models. By proposing a systematic framework to uncover vulnerabilities in LLM platforms that rely on third-party services, the authors have shed light on a critical issue that could have significant real-world implications.

The findings highlight the need for more robust security measures, increased transparency, and stronger oversight in the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems. As language models continue to evolve and become more deeply integrated into our daily lives, addressing these challenges will be crucial to ensuring the responsible and trustworthy use of this transformative technology.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Review

Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Review

HanXiang Xu, ShenAo Wang, NingKe Li, KaiLong Wang, YanJie Zhao, Kai Chen, Ting Yu, Yang Liu, HaoYu Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened up new opportunities for leveraging artificial intelligence in various domains, including cybersecurity. As the volume and sophistication of cyber threats continue to grow, there is an increasing need for intelligent systems that can automatically detect vulnerabilities, analyze malware, and respond to attacks. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on the application of LLMs in cybersecurity (LLM4Security). By comprehensively collecting over 30K relevant papers and systematically analyzing 127 papers from top security and software engineering venues, we aim to provide a holistic view of how LLMs are being used to solve diverse problems across the cybersecurity domain. Through our analysis, we identify several key findings. First, we observe that LLMs are being applied to a wide range of cybersecurity tasks, including vulnerability detection, malware analysis, network intrusion detection, and phishing detection. Second, we find that the datasets used for training and evaluating LLMs in these tasks are often limited in size and diversity, highlighting the need for more comprehensive and representative datasets. Third, we identify several promising techniques for adapting LLMs to specific cybersecurity domains, such as fine-tuning, transfer learning, and domain-specific pre-training. Finally, we discuss the main challenges and opportunities for future research in LLM4Security, including the need for more interpretable and explainable models, the importance of addressing data privacy and security concerns, and the potential for leveraging LLMs for proactive defense and threat hunting. Overall, our survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art in LLM4Security and identifies several promising directions for future research.

Read more

5/10/2024

Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study

Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study

Zeyu Yang, Zhao Meng, Xiaochen Zheng, Roger Wattenhofer

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, but their robustness against adversarial attacks remains a critical concern. We presents a novel white-box style attack approach that exposes vulnerabilities in leading open-source LLMs, including Llama, OPT, and T5. We assess the impact of model size, structure, and fine-tuning strategies on their resistance to adversarial perturbations. Our comprehensive evaluation across five diverse text classification tasks establishes a new benchmark for LLM robustness. The findings of this study have far-reaching implications for the reliable deployment of LLMs in real-world applications and contribute to the advancement of trustworthy AI systems.

Read more

5/7/2024

An Investigation into Misuse of Java Security APIs by Large Language Models

An Investigation into Misuse of Java Security APIs by Large Language Models

Zahra Mousavi, Chadni Islam, Kristen Moore, Alsharif Abuadbba, Muhammad Ali Babar

YC

0

Reddit

0

The increasing trend of using Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation raises the question of their capability to generate trustworthy code. While many researchers are exploring the utility of code generation for uncovering software vulnerabilities, one crucial but often overlooked aspect is the security Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). APIs play an integral role in upholding software security, yet effectively integrating security APIs presents substantial challenges. This leads to inadvertent misuse by developers, thereby exposing software to vulnerabilities. To overcome these challenges, developers may seek assistance from LLMs. In this paper, we systematically assess ChatGPT's trustworthiness in code generation for security API use cases in Java. To conduct a thorough evaluation, we compile an extensive collection of 48 programming tasks for 5 widely used security APIs. We employ both automated and manual approaches to effectively detect security API misuse in the code generated by ChatGPT for these tasks. Our findings are concerning: around 70% of the code instances across 30 attempts per task contain security API misuse, with 20 distinct misuse types identified. Moreover, for roughly half of the tasks, this rate reaches 100%, indicating that there is a long way to go before developers can rely on ChatGPT to securely implement security API code.

Read more

4/8/2024

Exploring Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code

Exploring Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code

Qibing Ren, Chang Gao, Jing Shao, Junchi Yan, Xin Tan, Yu Qiao, Wai Lam, Lizhuang Ma

YC

0

Reddit

0

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought about remarkable generative capabilities but also raised concerns about their potential misuse. While strategies like supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback have enhanced their safety, these methods primarily focus on natural languages, which may not generalize to other domains. This paper introduces CodeAttack, a framework that transforms natural language inputs into code inputs, presenting a novel environment for testing the safety generalization of LLMs. Our comprehensive studies on state-of-the-art LLMs including GPT-4, Claude-2, and Llama-2 series reveal a common safety vulnerability of these models against code input: CodeAttack bypasses the safety guardrails of all models more than 80% of the time. We find that a larger distribution gap between CodeAttack and natural language leads to weaker safety generalization, such as encoding natural language input with data structures. Furthermore, we give two hypotheses about the success of CodeAttack: (1) the misaligned bias acquired by LLMs during code training, prioritizing code completion over avoiding the potential safety risk; (2) the limited self-evaluation capability regarding the safety of their code outputs. Finally, we analyze potential mitigation measures. These findings highlight new safety risks in the code domain and the need for more robust safety alignment algorithms to match the code capabilities of LLMs.

Read more

4/9/2024