Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study
2405.02764
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, but their robustness against adversarial attacks remains a critical concern. We presents a novel white-box style attack approach that exposes vulnerabilities in leading open-source LLMs, including Llama, OPT, and T5. We assess the impact of model size, structure, and fine-tuning strategies on their resistance to adversarial perturbations. Our comprehensive evaluation across five diverse text classification tasks establishes a new benchmark for LLM robustness. The findings of this study have far-reaching implications for the reliable deployment of LLMs in real-world applications and contribute to the advancement of trustworthy AI systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an empirical study to assess the adversarial robustness of large language models (LLMs).
- The authors evaluate the performance of several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, against a diverse set of adversarial attacks.
- The study aims to provide insights into the robustness and vulnerabilities of these models, which have become increasingly important as LLMs are widely adopted in various applications.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers wanted to understand how well large language models, such as GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, can withstand different types of attacks designed to trick or fool them. These language models are becoming more and more common in various applications, so it's important to know how robust and reliable they are.
The researchers tested these models against a variety of adversarial attacks, which are special inputs designed to make the models produce incorrect or unexpected outputs. By doing this, they were able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these language models and understand where they might be vulnerable.
The goal was to provide insights that can help improve the reliability and security of these powerful language models as they become more widely used in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on assessing the adversarial robustness of several popular large language models, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa. The authors evaluate the models' performance against a diverse set of adversarial attacks, such as adversarial attacks on the conversation entailment task and attacks that leverage self-attention mechanisms.
The study uses a comprehensive benchmark, ALERT, to assess the models' robustness across a wide range of tasks and attack types. The authors also explore strategies for improving the robustness of large language models, such as through adversarial training.
The paper provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these popular language models, which have become increasingly important as they are widely adopted in various applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous assessment of the adversarial robustness of large language models. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is that the study focuses on a limited set of LLMs and does not cover the full diversity of models available. Additionally, the authors note that the adversarial attacks used in the study may not capture all possible types of attacks that could be encountered in real-world scenarios.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the observed vulnerabilities or provide clear guidance on how to effectively improve the robustness of these models. Additional research may be needed to better understand the specific mechanisms behind the models' susceptibility to adversarial attacks and to develop more robust defense strategies.
Overall, the paper represents an important contribution to the understanding of the security and reliability of large language models, but further work is still needed to address the various challenges and limitations identified.
Conclusion
This study provides a valuable empirical assessment of the adversarial robustness of several popular large language models. The findings suggest that these models, despite their impressive capabilities, can be vulnerable to a variety of adversarial attacks, underscoring the need for continued research and development to improve their security and reliability.
As LLMs become increasingly widespread in real-world applications, understanding and addressing their vulnerabilities will be crucial to ensure their safe and trustworthy deployment. The insights gained from this study can inform future efforts to enhance the robustness of large language models and contribute to the overall advancement of this important field of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Adversarial Evasion Attack Efficiency against Large Language Models
Jo~ao Vitorino, Eva Maia, Isabel Prac{c}a
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are valuable for text classification, but their vulnerabilities must not be disregarded. They lack robustness against adversarial examples, so it is pertinent to understand the impacts of different types of perturbations, and assess if those attacks could be replicated by common users with a small amount of perturbations and a small number of queries to a deployed LLM. This work presents an analysis of the effectiveness, efficiency, and practicality of three different types of adversarial attacks against five different LLMs in a sentiment classification task. The obtained results demonstrated the very distinct impacts of the word-level and character-level attacks. The word attacks were more effective, but the character and more constrained attacks were more practical and required a reduced number of perturbations and queries. These differences need to be considered during the development of adversarial defense strategies to train more robust LLMs for intelligent text classification applications.
6/13/2024
💬
Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models in Medicine
Yifan Yang, Qiao Jin, Furong Huang, Zhiyong Lu
0
0
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into healthcare applications offers promising advancements in medical diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and patient care. However, the susceptibility of LLMs to adversarial attacks poses a significant threat, potentially leading to harmful outcomes in delicate medical contexts. This study investigates the vulnerability of LLMs to two types of adversarial attacks in three medical tasks. Utilizing real-world patient data, we demonstrate that both open-source and proprietary LLMs are susceptible to manipulation across multiple tasks. This research further reveals that domain-specific tasks demand more adversarial data in model fine-tuning than general domain tasks for effective attack execution, especially for more capable models. We discover that while integrating adversarial data does not markedly degrade overall model performance on medical benchmarks, it does lead to noticeable shifts in fine-tuned model weights, suggesting a potential pathway for detecting and countering model attacks. This research highlights the urgent need for robust security measures and the development of defensive mechanisms to safeguard LLMs in medical applications, to ensure their safe and effective deployment in healthcare settings.
6/19/2024
Large Language Model Sentinel: Advancing Adversarial Robustness by LLM Agent
Guang Lin, Qibin Zhao
0
0
Over the past two years, the use of large language models (LLMs) has advanced rapidly. While these LLMs offer considerable convenience, they also raise security concerns, as LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks by some well-designed textual perturbations. In this paper, we introduce a novel defense technique named Large LAnguage MOdel Sentinel (LLAMOS), which is designed to enhance the adversarial robustness of LLMs by purifying the adversarial textual examples before feeding them into the target LLM. Our method comprises two main components: a) Agent instruction, which can simulate a new agent for adversarial defense, altering minimal characters to maintain the original meaning of the sentence while defending against attacks; b) Defense guidance, which provides strategies for modifying clean or adversarial examples to ensure effective defense and accurate outputs from the target LLMs. Remarkably, the defense agent demonstrates robust defensive capabilities even without learning from adversarial examples. Additionally, we conduct an intriguing adversarial experiment where we develop two agents, one for defense and one for defense, and engage them in mutual confrontation. During the adversarial interactions, neither agent completely beat the other. Extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source LLMs demonstrate that our method effectively defends against adversarial attacks, thereby enhancing adversarial robustness.
6/3/2024
Exploring Vulnerabilities and Protections in Large Language Models: A Survey
Frank Weizhen Liu, Chenhui Hu
0
0
As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly become key components in various AI applications, understanding their security vulnerabilities and the effectiveness of defense mechanisms is crucial. This survey examines the security challenges of LLMs, focusing on two main areas: Prompt Hacking and Adversarial Attacks, each with specific types of threats. Under Prompt Hacking, we explore Prompt Injection and Jailbreaking Attacks, discussing how they work, their potential impacts, and ways to mitigate them. Similarly, we analyze Adversarial Attacks, breaking them down into Data Poisoning Attacks and Backdoor Attacks. This structured examination helps us understand the relationships between these vulnerabilities and the defense strategies that can be implemented. The survey highlights these security challenges and discusses robust defensive frameworks to protect LLMs against these threats. By detailing these security issues, the survey contributes to the broader discussion on creating resilient AI systems that can resist sophisticated attacks.
6/4/2024