AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models & Generating Benchmark Dataset

Read original: arXiv:2406.19896 - Published 7/1/2024 by Bhaskar Joshi, Sepideh HajiHossein Khani, Arash HabibiLashkari
Total Score

0

AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models & Generating Benchmark Dataset

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • AuthAttLyzer-V2 is a study on improving code authorship attribution using enhanced ensemble learning models.
  • The researchers generated a new benchmark dataset to evaluate their approach.
  • Key contributions include developing a novel ensemble learning framework and conducting extensive experiments to assess its performance.

Plain English Explanation

The paper "AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models and Generating Benchmark Dataset" focuses on improving the ability to determine the author of a given piece of computer code. This is known as "code authorship attribution."

The researchers developed a new technique called "AuthAttLyzer-V2" that uses an advanced machine learning approach called "ensemble learning." Ensemble learning combines the predictions of multiple different models to make more accurate overall predictions.

To test their approach, the researchers created a new benchmark dataset - a collection of sample code from various authors. This provided a standardized way to evaluate the performance of their AuthAttLyzer-V2 system compared to other authorship attribution methods.

Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrated that their enhanced ensemble learning framework outperformed previous techniques for attributing code authorship. This advance could have important applications in areas like software engineering, cybersecurity, and digital forensics.

Technical Explanation

The paper "AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models and Generating Benchmark Dataset" presents a novel approach for code authorship attribution using an enhanced ensemble learning framework.

The key technical contributions include:

  1. Ensemble Learning Framework: The researchers developed a multi-model ensemble learning framework that combines the predictions of various base models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM. This ensemble approach leverages the strengths of different machine learning algorithms to improve overall performance.

  2. Feature Engineering: The researchers engineered a comprehensive set of features extracted from the source code, including lexical, syntactic, and stylometric characteristics. These features capture different aspects of the coding style that can be used to identify authorship.

  3. Benchmark Dataset: To facilitate the evaluation of code authorship attribution techniques, the researchers generated a new benchmark dataset containing source code samples from a diverse set of authors. This dataset can serve as a standardized testbed for future research in this area.

  4. Extensive Evaluation: The researchers conducted a thorough experimental evaluation of their AuthAttLyzer-V2 framework, assessing its performance on the new benchmark dataset and comparing it to state-of-the-art authorship attribution methods. Their results demonstrate the superiority of the ensemble learning approach over individual base models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed study on code authorship attribution. The researchers have made several notable contributions, including the development of an enhanced ensemble learning framework and the creation of a new benchmark dataset.

However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are:

  1. Scalability: The experiments were conducted on a relatively small dataset, and it would be valuable to assess the performance of AuthAttLyzer-V2 on larger-scale datasets with a greater number of authors.

  2. Real-world Applicability: The benchmark dataset used in the study may not fully capture the complexities and challenges encountered in real-world software development scenarios. Additional evaluation on more diverse and realistic datasets would strengthen the practical relevance of the findings.

  3. Explainability: While the ensemble learning approach demonstrated strong performance, it may be less interpretable than individual machine learning models. Exploring ways to enhance the explainability of the AuthAttLyzer-V2 framework could be a valuable direction for future research.

  4. Adversarial Attacks: The paper does not address the potential vulnerability of the proposed system to adversarial attacks, where an adversary may deliberately modify the source code to mislead the authorship attribution system. Investigating the robustness of AuthAttLyzer-V2 against such attacks would be an important area for further investigation.

Conclusion

The paper "AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models and Generating Benchmark Dataset" presents a significant advancement in the field of code authorship attribution. The researchers have developed a novel ensemble learning framework that outperforms existing techniques, and they have also contributed a new benchmark dataset to facilitate further research in this area.

The findings of this study have the potential to impact various domains, such as software engineering, cybersecurity, and digital forensics, where accurately attributing code authorship is crucial. The enhanced ensemble learning approach demonstrated in this work could serve as a foundation for future developments in authorship attribution, helping to address the challenges and limitations highlighted in the critical analysis.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models & Generating Benchmark Dataset
Total Score

0

AuthAttLyzer-V2: Unveiling Code Authorship Attribution using Enhanced Ensemble Learning Models & Generating Benchmark Dataset

Bhaskar Joshi, Sepideh HajiHossein Khani, Arash HabibiLashkari

Source Code Authorship Attribution (SCAA) is crucial for software classification because it provides insights into the origin and behavior of software. By accurately identifying the author or group behind a piece of code, experts can better understand the motivations and techniques of developers. In the cybersecurity era, this attribution helps trace the source of malicious software, identify patterns in the code that may indicate specific threat actors or groups, and ultimately enhance threat intelligence and mitigation strategies. This paper presents AuthAttLyzer-V2, a new source code feature extractor for SCAA, focusing on lexical, semantic, syntactic, and N-gram features. Our research explores author identification in C++ by examining 24,000 source code samples from 3,000 authors. Our methodology integrates Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost models, enhanced with SHAP for interpretability. The study demonstrates how ensemble models can effectively discern individual coding styles, offering insights into the unique attributes of code authorship. This approach is pivotal in understanding and interpreting complex patterns in authorship attribution, especially for malware classification.

Read more

7/1/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Advanced Detection of Source Code Clones via an Ensemble of Unsupervised Similarity Measures

Jorge Martinez-Gil

The capability of accurately determining code similarity is crucial in many tasks related to software development. For example, it might be essential to identify code duplicates for performing software maintenance. This research introduces a novel ensemble learning approach for code similarity assessment, combining the strengths of multiple unsupervised similarity measures. The key idea is that the strengths of a diverse set of similarity measures can complement each other and mitigate individual weaknesses, leading to improved performance. Preliminary results show that while Transformers-based CodeBERT and its variant GraphCodeBERT are undoubtedly the best option in the presence of abundant training data, in the case of specific small datasets (up to 500 samples), our ensemble achieves similar results, without prejudice to the interpretability of the resulting solution, and with a much lower associated carbon footprint due to training. The source code of this novel approach can be downloaded from https://github.com/jorge-martinez-gil/ensemble-codesim.

Read more

5/6/2024

⚙️

Total Score

1

I still know it's you! On Challenges in Anonymizing Source Code

Micha Horlboge, Erwin Quiring, Roland Meyer, Konrad Rieck

The source code of a program not only defines its semantics but also contains subtle clues that can identify its author. Several studies have shown that these clues can be automatically extracted using machine learning and allow for determining a program's author among hundreds of programmers. This attribution poses a significant threat to developers of anti-censorship and privacy-enhancing technologies, as they become identifiable and may be prosecuted. An ideal protection from this threat would be the anonymization of source code. However, neither theoretical nor practical principles of such an anonymization have been explored so far. In this paper, we tackle this problem and develop a framework for reasoning about code anonymization. We prove that the task of generating a $k$-anonymous program -- a program that cannot be attributed to one of $k$ authors -- is not computable in the general case. As a remedy, we introduce a relaxed concept called $k$-uncertainty, which enables us to measure the protection of developers. Based on this concept, we empirically study candidate techniques for anonymization, such as code normalization, coding style imitation, and code obfuscation. We find that none of the techniques provides sufficient protection when the attacker is aware of the anonymization. While we observe a notable reduction in attribution performance on real-world code, a reliable protection is not achieved for all developers. We conclude that code anonymization is a hard problem that requires further attention from the research community.

Read more

4/11/2024

Towards Effective Authorship Attribution: Integrating Class-Incremental Learning
Total Score

0

Towards Effective Authorship Attribution: Integrating Class-Incremental Learning

Mostafa Rahgouy, Hamed Babaei Giglou, Mehnaz Tabassum, Dongji Feng, Amit Das, Taher Rahgooy, Gerry Dozier, Cheryl D. Seals

AA is the process of attributing an unidentified document to its true author from a predefined group of known candidates, each possessing multiple samples. The nature of AA necessitates accommodating emerging new authors, as each individual must be considered unique. This uniqueness can be attributed to various factors, including their stylistic preferences, areas of expertise, gender, cultural background, and other personal characteristics that influence their writing. These diverse attributes contribute to the distinctiveness of each author, making it essential for AA systems to recognize and account for these variations. However, current AA benchmarks commonly overlook this uniqueness and frame the problem as a closed-world classification, assuming a fixed number of authors throughout the system's lifespan and neglecting the inclusion of emerging new authors. This oversight renders the majority of existing approaches ineffective for real-world applications of AA, where continuous learning is essential. These inefficiencies manifest as current models either resist learning new authors or experience catastrophic forgetting, where the introduction of new data causes the models to lose previously acquired knowledge. To address these inefficiencies, we propose redefining AA as CIL, where new authors are introduced incrementally after the initial training phase, allowing the system to adapt and learn continuously. To achieve this, we briefly examine subsequent CIL approaches introduced in other domains. Moreover, we have adopted several well-known CIL methods, along with an examination of their strengths and weaknesses in the context of AA. Additionally, we outline potential future directions for advancing CIL AA systems. As a result, our paper can serve as a starting point for evolving AA systems from closed-world models to continual learning through CIL paradigms.

Read more

8/20/2024