AutoDDL: Automatic Distributed Deep Learning with Near-Optimal Bandwidth Cost

Overview

• The paper proposes a distributed training framework called AutoDDL that automatically explores and exploits new parallelization schemes to efficiently train large-scale deep learning models on distributed systems.
• AutoDDL uses OneFlow's Split, Broadcast, and Partial Sum (SBP) abstraction to facilitate the description and implementation of different parallelization schemes.
• AutoDDL combines an analytical performance model with a customized Coordinate Descent algorithm to significantly reduce the overhead of searching for optimal parallelization schemes.
• Experiments on Multi-Node-Single-GPU and Multi-Node-Multi-GPU systems using Transformer and VGG models show that AutoDDL can reduce the end-to-end training time by up to 31.1% and 71.5%, respectively, compared to expert-optimized implementations.

Plain English Explanation

Training large-scale deep learning models on distributed systems is a complex task that requires carefully balancing different types of parallelism, such as data, operator, and pipeline parallelism. This can be a significant burden on machine learning practitioners. To address this, the researchers have developed a system called AutoDDL that can automatically find the best way to split up and distribute the training process across multiple machines and GPUs.

AutoDDL uses a set of building blocks called Split, Broadcast, and Partial Sum (SBP) to describe and implement different parallelization schemes. It then uses an analytical performance model and a specialized optimization algorithm to quickly identify the most efficient scheme for a given deep learning model and hardware setup. This allows AutoDDL to outperform the training times of expert-optimized implementations by a substantial margin, up to 31.1% for a Transformer model and 71.5% for a VGG model.

The key innovation of AutoDDL is its ability to automatically explore and exploit parallelization schemes, relieving machine learning researchers and engineers of the burden of manually designing and tuning the distributed training process. This can lead to significant time savings and enable the efficient training of ever-larger deep learning models on distributed hardware.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a distributed training framework called AutoDDL that automatically explores and exploits new parallelization schemes to efficiently train large-scale deep learning models on distributed systems. AutoDDL utilizes OneFlow's Split, Broadcast, and Partial Sum (SBP) abstraction to facilitate the description and implementation of different parallelization schemes.

To reduce the overhead of searching for optimal parallelization schemes, AutoDDL combines an analytical performance model with a customized Coordinate Descent algorithm. The performance model estimates the bandwidth cost of different parallelization schemes, and the Coordinate Descent algorithm iteratively refines the scheme to minimize the bandwidth cost.

The researchers evaluate AutoDDL on Multi-Node-Single-GPU and Multi-Node-Multi-GPU systems using various deep learning models, including Transformer and VGG. Compared to expert-optimized implementations, AutoDDL reduces the end-to-end training time by up to 31.1% and 10% for Transformer, and up to 17.7% and 71.5% for VGG, on the two parallel systems, respectively.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to the challenging problem of efficiently training large-scale deep learning models on distributed systems. The key strength of AutoDDL is its ability to automatically explore and optimize parallelization schemes, which can significantly reduce the burden on machine learning practitioners.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the limitations and potential issues with the proposed framework. For example, the performance model used by AutoDDL may not accurately capture all the complexities of real-world distributed training scenarios, such as the impact of network latency, resource contention, or hardware heterogeneity. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the scalability of AutoDDL to larger, more complex models or distributed systems with a higher number of nodes.

Further research could explore ways to enhance the performance model, improve the optimization algorithm, and investigate the generalization of AutoDDL to a wider range of deep learning models and hardware configurations. Additionally, it would be valuable to compare AutoDDL's performance to other distributed training frameworks, such as GAD, ANTDT, or Sampling-based Distributed Training, to better understand its relative strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusion

The AutoDDL framework proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of distributed deep learning training. By automatically exploring and exploiting parallelization schemes, AutoDDL can substantially reduce the end-to-end training time of large-scale models, making it a valuable tool for machine learning researchers and engineers working on computationally intensive deep learning tasks.

The paper's key contribution is the development of a system that can seamlessly handle the complex trade-offs involved in distributed training, freeing practitioners from the burden of manual optimization. While the paper does not address all potential limitations, the results demonstrate the promising potential of AutoDDL and highlight the importance of continued research in this area to enable the efficient training of ever-larger and more sophisticated deep learning models.