Automated Code-centric Software Vulnerability Assessment: How Far Are We? An Empirical Study in C/C++
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an empirical study on the current state of automated code-centric software vulnerability assessment, focusing on C/C++ codebases.
- The authors investigate the performance of state-of-the-art vulnerability detection tools and identify key challenges and limitations in the field.
- The study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the progress and limitations of automated vulnerability assessment techniques.
Plain English Explanation
Cybersecurity is a critical concern in the digital age, and identifying software vulnerabilities is a crucial task. Automated code-centric software vulnerability assessment is a promising approach that uses machine learning and deep learning to automatically detect vulnerabilities in software code, without relying on human experts.
This research paper examines the current capabilities and limitations of these automated vulnerability detection tools, focusing on C/C++ codebases. The authors conducted an empirical study to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art vulnerability detection tools, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the progress and challenges in this field.
The study analyzed a large dataset of C/C++ projects, including both vulnerable and non-vulnerable code samples, to assess the accuracy and reliability of the vulnerability detection tools. The researchers investigated key aspects such as the tools' ability to identify different types of vulnerabilities, their performance on real-world codebases, and the factors that contribute to their success or failure.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive empirical study on the current state of automated code-centric software vulnerability assessment in C/C++ codebases. The authors evaluated the performance of several state-of-the-art vulnerability detection tools, including both traditional rule-based approaches and deep learning-based methods.
The study was conducted on a large dataset of C/C++ projects, comprising both vulnerable and non-vulnerable code samples. The researchers assessed the tools' ability to accurately identify different types of vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows, format string vulnerabilities, and use-after-free bugs. Additionally, they analyzed the tools' performance on real-world codebases, examining factors like code complexity, project size, and the presence of false positives and false negatives.
The findings of the study revealed both the progress and the limitations of the current automated vulnerability detection techniques. While the tools demonstrated promising capabilities in certain scenarios, the researchers also identified significant challenges, such as the inability to handle complex code structures, the high rate of false positives, and the lack of contextual understanding.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable and insightful analysis of the current state of automated code-centric software vulnerability assessment. The authors acknowledge the limitations of the study, such as the potential bias in the dataset and the exclusion of certain vulnerability types. Additionally, they highlight the need for further research to address the identified challenges, such as improving the tools' ability to handle complex code structures and enhancing their contextual understanding.
One potential area for further exploration is the incorporation of advanced techniques like large language models to enhance the vulnerability detection capabilities. Additionally, the authors suggest the need for comprehensive benchmarking frameworks to facilitate the systematic evaluation and comparison of different vulnerability detection approaches.
Conclusion
This empirical study offers a comprehensive assessment of the current state of automated code-centric software vulnerability assessment in C/C++ codebases. The findings highlight both the progress and the limitations of the existing tools, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in the field of software vulnerability detection.
The study underscores the need for continued research and development to address the identified challenges, ultimately aiming to enhance the reliability and effectiveness of automated vulnerability detection techniques. The insights gained from this work can inform the design of more robust and accurate vulnerability detection systems, contributing to the broader goal of improving software security and protecting systems from cyber threats.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Automated Code-centric Software Vulnerability Assessment: How Far Are We? An Empirical Study in C/C++
Anh The Nguyen, Triet Huynh Minh Le, M. Ali Babar
Background: The C and C++ languages hold significant importance in Software Engineering research because of their widespread use in practice. Numerous studies have utilized Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques to detect software vulnerabilities (SVs) in the source code written in these languages. However, the application of these techniques in function-level SV assessment has been largely unexplored. SV assessment is increasingly crucial as it provides detailed information on the exploitability, impacts, and severity of security defects, thereby aiding in their prioritization and remediation. Aims: We conduct the first empirical study to investigate and compare the performance of ML and DL models, many of which have been used for SV detection, for function-level SV assessment in C/C++. Method: Using 9,993 vulnerable C/C++ functions, we evaluated the performance of six multi-class ML models and five multi-class DL models for the SV assessment at the function level based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). We further explore multi-task learning, which can leverage common vulnerable code to predict all SV assessment outputs simultaneously in a single model, and compare the effectiveness and efficiency of this model type with those of the original multi-class models. Results: We show that ML has matching or even better performance compared to the multi-class DL models for function-level SV assessment with significantly less training time. Employing multi-task learning allows the DL models to perform significantly better, with an average of 8-22% increase in Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Conclusions: We distill the practices of using data-driven techniques for function-level SV assessment in C/C++, including the use of multi-task DL to balance efficiency and effectiveness. This can establish a strong foundation for future work in this area.
Read more7/31/2024
🌀
0
Statement-Level Vulnerability Detection: Learning Vulnerability Patterns Through Information Theory and Contrastive Learning
Van Nguyen, Trung Le, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Michael Fu, John Grundy, Hung Nguyen, Seyit Camtepe, Paul Quirk, Dinh Phung
Software vulnerabilities are a serious and crucial concern. Typically, in a program or function consisting of hundreds or thousands of source code statements, there are only a few statements causing the corresponding vulnerabilities. Most current approaches to vulnerability labelling are done on a function or program level by experts with the assistance of machine learning tools. Extending this approach to the code statement level is much more costly and time-consuming and remains an open problem. In this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end deep learning-based approach to identify the vulnerability-relevant code statements of a specific function. Inspired by the specific structures observed in real-world vulnerable code, we first leverage mutual information for learning a set of latent variables representing the relevance of the source code statements to the corresponding function's vulnerability. We then propose novel clustered spatial contrastive learning in order to further improve the representation learning and the robust selection process of vulnerability-relevant code statements. Experimental results on real-world datasets of 200k+ C/C++ functions show the superiority of our method over other state-of-the-art baselines. In general, our method obtains a higher performance in VCP, VCA, and Top-10 ACC measures of between 3% to 14% over the baselines when running on real-world datasets in an unsupervised setting. Our released source code samples are publicly available at href{https://github.com/vannguyennd/livuitcl}{https://github.com/vannguyennd/livuitcl.}
Read more6/13/2024
0
VulDetectBench: Evaluating the Deep Capability of Vulnerability Detection with Large Language Models
Yu Liu, Lang Gao, Mingxin Yang, Yu Xie, Ping Chen, Xiaojin Zhang, Wei Chen
Large Language Models (LLMs) have training corpora containing large amounts of program code, greatly improving the model's code comprehension and generation capabilities. However, sound comprehensive research on detecting program vulnerabilities, a more specific task related to code, and evaluating the performance of LLMs in this more specialized scenario is still lacking. To address common challenges in vulnerability analysis, our study introduces a new benchmark, VulDetectBench, specifically designed to assess the vulnerability detection capabilities of LLMs. The benchmark comprehensively evaluates LLM's ability to identify, classify, and locate vulnerabilities through five tasks of increasing difficulty. We evaluate the performance of 17 models (both open- and closed-source) and find that while existing models can achieve over 80% accuracy on tasks related to vulnerability identification and classification, they still fall short on specific, more detailed vulnerability analysis tasks, with less than 30% accuracy, making it difficult to provide valuable auxiliary information for professional vulnerability mining. Our benchmark effectively evaluates the capabilities of various LLMs at different levels in the specific task of vulnerability detection, providing a foundation for future research and improvements in this critical area of code security. VulDetectBench is publicly available at https://github.com/Sweetaroo/VulDetectBench.
Read more8/22/2024
💬
0
Harnessing Large Language Models for Software Vulnerability Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Study
Karl Tamberg, Hayretdin Bahsi
Despite various approaches being employed to detect vulnerabilities, the number of reported vulnerabilities shows an upward trend over the years. This suggests the problems are not caught before the code is released, which could be caused by many factors, like lack of awareness, limited efficacy of the existing vulnerability detection tools or the tools not being user-friendly. To help combat some issues with traditional vulnerability detection tools, we propose using large language models (LLMs) to assist in finding vulnerabilities in source code. LLMs have shown a remarkable ability to understand and generate code, underlining their potential in code-related tasks. The aim is to test multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and identify the best prompting strategies, allowing extraction of the best value from the LLMs. We provide an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the LLM-based approach and compare the results to those of traditional static analysis tools. We find that LLMs can pinpoint many more issues than traditional static analysis tools, outperforming traditional tools in terms of recall and F1 scores. The results should benefit software developers and security analysts responsible for ensuring that the code is free of vulnerabilities.
Read more5/27/2024