Automatic Data Curation for Self-Supervised Learning: A Clustering-Based Approach

Read original: arXiv:2405.15613 - Published 7/1/2024 by Huy V. Vo, Vasil Khalidov, Timoth'ee Darcet, Th'eo Moutakanni, Nikita Smetanin, Marc Szafraniec, Hugo Touvron, Camille Couprie, Maxime Oquab, Armand Joulin and 3 others
Total Score

0

Automatic Data Curation for Self-Supervised Learning: A Clustering-Based Approach

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a clustering-based approach for automatically curating data for self-supervised learning.
  • The method aims to select a diverse and representative subset of data to train self-supervised models, improving their performance compared to using the full uncurated dataset.
  • The authors explore different clustering techniques and propose a novel adaptive clustering method to balance data diversity and representativeness.

Plain English Explanation

Self-supervised learning is a powerful technique where models learn useful features from data without the need for human-provided labels. However, the performance of these models can be sensitive to the quality and diversity of the training data. This paper introduces a novel approach to automatically curate the training data for self-supervised learning.

The key idea is to use clustering to identify a diverse and representative subset of the available data. By clustering the data and selecting examples from each cluster, the method can capture the underlying data distribution more effectively than using the full uncurated dataset. This helps the self-supervised model learn more robust and generalizable features.

The paper explores different clustering techniques and proposes an adaptive clustering method that can balance the trade-off between data diversity and representativeness. This adaptive approach aims to identify the optimal number of clusters to use, rather than relying on a fixed clustering configuration.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their data curation approach on several self-supervised learning benchmarks, showing significant performance improvements compared to training on the full uncurated dataset. This work highlights the importance of careful data curation for self-supervised learning, and provides a practical technique to automate this process.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a clustering-based approach for automatically curating data for self-supervised learning. The key idea is to identify a diverse and representative subset of the available data to train self-supervised models, which can improve their performance compared to using the full uncurated dataset.

The authors explore different clustering techniques, including K-Means, Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), and Hierarchical Clustering. They also propose a novel adaptive clustering method that aims to balance the trade-off between data diversity and representativeness. This adaptive approach automatically determines the optimal number of clusters to use, rather than relying on a fixed clustering configuration.

The data curation process involves the following steps:

  1. Extracting features from the input data using a pre-trained encoder network.
  2. Applying the selected clustering algorithm (K-Means, GMM, or the proposed adaptive clustering) to the feature representations.
  3. Selecting a subset of examples from each cluster to form the curated dataset.

The authors evaluate their data curation approach on several self-supervised learning benchmarks, including image classification and video representation learning. The results demonstrate significant performance improvements when using the curated dataset compared to the full uncurated dataset, highlighting the importance of careful data selection for self-supervised learning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed and comprehensive approach to automating the data curation process for self-supervised learning. The authors explore multiple clustering techniques and propose a novel adaptive clustering method that can balance data diversity and representativeness.

One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on a pre-trained encoder network to extract features for clustering. The performance of the data curation approach may be influenced by the quality and domain-specificity of the pre-trained encoder. It would be interesting to investigate the impact of different feature extraction methods, including learning the features jointly with the clustering process.

Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating the curated datasets on standard self-supervised learning benchmarks. It would be valuable to explore the real-world applicability of the approach, such as how it performs on downstream tasks or in domain-specific settings where data curation is particularly crucial.

Overall, this work makes a significant contribution to the field of self-supervised learning by introducing a practical and effective method for automatic data curation. The insights and techniques presented in the paper can help researchers and practitioners improve the performance and robustness of self-supervised models in a wide range of applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a clustering-based approach for automatically curating data for self-supervised learning. By selecting a diverse and representative subset of the available data, the method can improve the performance of self-supervised models compared to training on the full uncurated dataset.

The authors explore different clustering techniques, including a novel adaptive clustering method that can balance the trade-off between data diversity and representativeness. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed data curation approach on several self-supervised learning benchmarks, highlighting its potential to enhance the performance and robustness of self-supervised models.

This work underscores the importance of careful data curation for self-supervised learning and provides a practical technique to automate this process. The insights and techniques presented in the paper can be valuable for researchers and practitioners working in the field of self-supervised learning and its applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Automatic Data Curation for Self-Supervised Learning: A Clustering-Based Approach
Total Score

0

Automatic Data Curation for Self-Supervised Learning: A Clustering-Based Approach

Huy V. Vo, Vasil Khalidov, Timoth'ee Darcet, Th'eo Moutakanni, Nikita Smetanin, Marc Szafraniec, Hugo Touvron, Camille Couprie, Maxime Oquab, Armand Joulin, Herv'e J'egou, Patrick Labatut, Piotr Bojanowski

Self-supervised features are the cornerstone of modern machine learning systems. They are typically pre-trained on data collections whose construction and curation typically require extensive human effort. This manual process has some limitations similar to those encountered in supervised learning, e.g., the crowd-sourced selection of data is costly and time-consuming, preventing scaling the dataset size. In this work, we consider the problem of automatic curation of high-quality datasets for self-supervised pre-training. We posit that such datasets should be large, diverse and balanced, and propose a clustering-based approach for building ones satisfying all these criteria. Our method involves successive and hierarchical applications of $k$-means on a large and diverse data repository to obtain clusters that distribute uniformly among data concepts, followed by a hierarchical, balanced sampling step from these clusters. Extensive experiments on three different data domains including web-based images, satellite images and text show that features trained on our automatically curated datasets outperform those trained on uncurated data while being on par or better than ones trained on manually curated data. Code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/ssl-data-curation.

Read more

7/1/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

A review on discriminative self-supervised learning methods

Nikolaos Giakoumoglou, Tania Stathaki

In the field of computer vision, self-supervised learning has emerged as a method to extract robust features from unlabeled data, where models derive labels autonomously from the data itself, without the need for manual annotation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of discriminative approaches of self-supervised learning within the domain of computer vision, examining their evolution and current status. Through an exploration of various methods including contrastive, self-distillation, knowledge distillation, feature decorrelation, and clustering techniques, we investigate how these approaches leverage the abundance of unlabeled data. Finally, we have comparison of self-supervised learning methods on the standard ImageNet classification benchmark.

Read more

5/9/2024

Image Clustering Algorithm Based on Self-Supervised Pretrained Models and Latent Feature Distribution Optimization
Total Score

0

Image Clustering Algorithm Based on Self-Supervised Pretrained Models and Latent Feature Distribution Optimization

Qiuyu Zhu, Liheng Hu, Sijin Wang

In the face of complex natural images, existing deep clustering algorithms fall significantly short in terms of clustering accuracy when compared to supervised classification methods, making them less practical. This paper introduces an image clustering algorithm based on self-supervised pretrained models and latent feature distribution optimization, substantially enhancing clustering performance. It is found that: (1) For complex natural images, we effectively enhance the discriminative power of latent features by leveraging self-supervised pretrained models and their fine-tuning, resulting in improved clustering performance. (2) In the latent feature space, by searching for k-nearest neighbor images for each training sample and shortening the distance between the training sample and its nearest neighbor, the discriminative power of latent features can be further enhanced, and clustering performance can be improved. (3) In the latent feature space, reducing the distance between sample features and the nearest predefined cluster centroids can optimize the distribution of latent features, therefore further improving clustering performance. Through experiments on multiple datasets, our approach outperforms the latest clustering algorithms and achieves state-of-the-art clustering results. When the number of categories in the datasets is small, such as CIFAR-10 and STL-10, and there are significant differences between categories, our clustering algorithm has similar accuracy to supervised methods without using pretrained models, slightly lower than supervised methods using pre-trained models. The code linked algorithm is https://github.com/LihengHu/semi.

Read more

8/13/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Self-Training: A Survey

Massih-Reza Amini, Vasilii Feofanov, Loic Pauletto, Lies Hadjadj, Emilie Devijver, Yury Maximov

Semi-supervised algorithms aim to learn prediction functions from a small set of labeled observations and a large set of unlabeled observations. Because this framework is relevant in many applications, they have received a lot of interest in both academia and industry. Among the existing techniques, self-training methods have undoubtedly attracted greater attention in recent years. These models are designed to find the decision boundary on low density regions without making additional assumptions about the data distribution, and use the unsigned output score of a learned classifier, or its margin, as an indicator of confidence. The working principle of self-training algorithms is to learn a classifier iteratively by assigning pseudo-labels to the set of unlabeled training samples with a margin greater than a certain threshold. The pseudo-labeled examples are then used to enrich the labeled training data and to train a new classifier in conjunction with the labeled training set. In this paper, we present self-training methods for binary and multi-class classification; as well as their variants and two related approaches, namely consistency-based approaches and transductive learning. We examine the impact of significant self-training features on various methods, using different general and image classification benchmarks, and we discuss our ideas for future research in self-training. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first thorough and complete survey on this subject.

Read more

5/28/2024