Automatic generation of insights from workers' actions in industrial workflows with explainable Machine Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of explainable machine learning to automatically generate insights from workers' actions in industrial workflows.
- The goal is to provide real-time feedback to workers and optimize industrial processes by understanding worker behavior and performance.
- The approach involves using sensor data to track worker actions, applying machine learning models to analyze the data, and generating actionable insights that can be communicated to workers.
Plain English Explanation
In industrial settings, workers play a crucial role in operating and maintaining complex machinery and workflows. Explainable AI techniques can be used to analyze the actions and behaviors of these workers in order to optimize their performance and the overall efficiency of the industrial process.
The researchers in this study used sensors to track the movements and actions of workers as they went about their tasks. They then applied machine learning models to this sensor data to identify patterns and extract insights about worker behavior and performance.
For example, the models may be able to identify when a worker is struggling with a particular task or is becoming fatigued. This information can then be fed back to the worker in real-time, allowing them to adjust their approach and maintain high productivity. It can also be used by managers to identify areas for training or process improvements.
By making the machine learning models explainable, the researchers ensure that the insights generated are not just black boxes, but can be understood and acted upon by both workers and managers. This can help build trust in the technology and ensure that it is used effectively to improve industrial operations.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used a combination of sensor data, machine learning, and explainable AI techniques to generate insights from worker actions in industrial workflows.
First, they used various sensors, such as motion tracking and RFID, to capture data on the movements and actions of workers as they performed their tasks. This sensor data was then fed into a machine learning model that was trained to identify patterns and extract insights from the worker behavior.
To ensure that the insights generated by the model were interpretable and actionable, the researchers employed explainable AI techniques. This involved using machine learning models that could not only make predictions, but also provide explanations for their outputs. This allowed the researchers to understand the factors that were driving the model's insights, and to communicate these insights to workers and managers in a clear and meaningful way.
The insights generated by the model were then used to provide real-time feedback to workers, allowing them to adjust their behavior and improve their performance. The insights could also be used by managers to identify areas for process improvements or worker training.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their paper. For example, they note that the sensor data used in the study may not have captured all aspects of worker behavior, and that additional sensors or data sources may be needed to obtain a more complete picture.
Additionally, the researchers highlight the need for further research into the long-term effects of providing real-time feedback to workers, as well as the potential for worker resistance or mistrust of the technology. It will be important to ensure that the use of explainable AI in this context is transparent and that workers have a clear understanding of how the insights are being generated and used.
Overall, the study represents an interesting and potentially valuable application of explainable AI in the industrial setting. However, more research is needed to fully understand the benefits and challenges of this approach, and to ensure that it is implemented in a way that is both effective and ethically sound.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the potential of explainable machine learning to generate valuable insights from the actions of workers in industrial workflows. By combining sensor data, machine learning, and explainable AI techniques, the researchers were able to provide real-time feedback to workers and identify opportunities for process optimization.
While the study has some limitations, it highlights the broader potential of using explainable AI to enhance human-machine collaboration in industrial settings. As AI systems become more advanced and ubiquitous, it will be increasingly important to ensure that they are transparent, interpretable, and aligned with the needs and values of the people who use them.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Automatic generation of insights from workers' actions in industrial workflows with explainable Machine Learning
Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez, Javier Otero-Mosquera, Francisco J. Gonz'alez-Casta~no, Felipe Gil-Casti~neira
New technologies such as Machine Learning (ML) gave great potential for evaluating industry workflows and automatically generating key performance indicators (KPIs). However, despite established standards for measuring the efficiency of industrial machinery, there is no precise equivalent for workers' productivity, which would be highly desirable given the lack of a skilled workforce for the next generation of industry workflows. Therefore, an ML solution combining data from manufacturing processes and workers' performance for that goal is required. Additionally, in recent times intense effort has been devoted to explainable ML approaches that can automatically explain their decisions to a human operator, thus increasing their trustworthiness. We propose to apply explainable ML solutions to differentiate between expert and inexpert workers in industrial workflows, which we validate at a quality assessment industrial workstation. Regarding the methodology used, input data are captured by a manufacturing machine and stored in a NoSQL database. Data are processed to engineer features used in automatic classification and to compute workers' KPIs to predict their level of expertise (with all classification metrics exceeding 90 %). These KPIs, and the relevant features in the decisions are textually explained by natural language expansion on an explainability dashboard. These automatic explanations made it possible to infer knowledge from expert workers for inexpert workers. The latter illustrates the interest of research in self-explainable ML for automatically generating insights to improve productivity in industrial workflows.
Read more6/19/2024
📉
0
Robustness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industrial Process Modelling
Benedikt Kantz, Clemens Staudinger, Christoph Feilmayr, Johannes Wachlmayr, Alexander Haberl, Stefan Schuster, Franz Pernkopf
eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims at providing understandable explanations of black box models. In this paper, we evaluate current XAI methods by scoring them based on ground truth simulations and sensitivity analysis. To this end, we used an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) model to better understand the limits and robustness characteristics of XAI methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), as well as Averaged Local Effects (ALE) or Smooth Gradients (SG) in a highly topical setting. These XAI methods were applied to various types of black-box models and then scored based on their correctness compared to the ground-truth sensitivity of the data-generating processes using a novel scoring evaluation methodology over a range of simulated additive noise. The resulting evaluation shows that the capability of the Machine Learning (ML) models to capture the process accurately is, indeed, coupled with the correctness of the explainability of the underlying data-generating process. We furthermore show the differences between XAI methods in their ability to correctly predict the true sensitivity of the modeled industrial process.
Read more7/15/2024
🎯
0
Automated Explanation Selection for Scientific Discovery
Markus Iser
Automated reasoning is a key technology in the young but rapidly growing field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Explanability helps build trust in artificial intelligence systems beyond their mere predictive accuracy and robustness. In this paper, we propose a cycle of scientific discovery that combines machine learning with automated reasoning for the generation and the selection of explanations. We present a taxonomy of explanation selection problems that draws on insights from sociology and cognitive science. These selection criteria subsume existing notions and extend them with new properties.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
Read more6/13/2024