Automating Dataset Updates Towards Reliable and Timely Evaluation of Large Language Models
2402.11894
0
0
š¬
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various natural language benchmarks, prompting a continual need to curate more difficult datasets for larger LLMs, which is costly and time-consuming. In this paper, we propose to automate dataset updating and provide systematic analysis regarding its effectiveness in dealing with benchmark leakage issue, difficulty control, and stability. Thus, once the current benchmark has been mastered or leaked, we can update it for timely and reliable evaluation. There are two updating strategies: 1) mimicking strategy to generate similar samples based on original data, preserving stylistic and contextual essence, and 2) extending strategy that further expands existing samples at varying cognitive levels by adapting Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Extensive experiments on updated MMLU and BIG-Bench demonstrate the stability of the proposed strategies and find that the mimicking strategy can effectively alleviate issues of overestimation from benchmark leakage. In cases where the efficient mimicking strategy fails, our extending strategy still shows promising results. Additionally, by controlling the difficulty, we can better discern the models' performance and enable fine-grained analysis neither too difficult nor too easy an exam can fairly judge students' learning status. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to automate updating benchmarks for reliable and timely evaluation. Our demo leaderboard can be found at https://yingjiahao14.github.io/Automating-DatasetUpdates/.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on various natural language benchmarks.
- Continually curating more difficult datasets for larger LLMs is costly and time-consuming.
- This paper proposes automating dataset updating and analyzing its effectiveness in dealing with benchmark leakage, difficulty control, and stability.
- Two updating strategies are introduced: 1) mimicking to generate similar samples, and 2) extending to expand existing samples at varying cognitive levels.
Plain English Explanation
As large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable at natural language tasks, researchers need to continually create more challenging benchmarks to accurately evaluate their performance. However, curating these new datasets is a time-consuming and expensive process.
This paper proposes an automated approach to updating benchmarks. The key idea is to use two different strategies to generate new test samples:
-
Mimicking: This strategy creates new samples that are similar in style and context to the original data, preserving the essence of the benchmark.
-
Extending: This strategy takes the existing samples and expands them to cover a wider range of cognitive difficulty levels, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives.
By automating the process of updating benchmarks, the researchers aim to address several key issues:
- Benchmark leakage: As models become too good at the original benchmark, the results can become inflated and unreliable. The mimicking strategy helps alleviate this problem.
- Difficulty control: By controlling the cognitive difficulty of the new samples, the researchers can create benchmarks that are neither too easy nor too hard, allowing for more accurate and nuanced evaluations of model performance.
- Stability: The proposed strategies demonstrate stable and reliable results, ensuring the benchmarks remain relevant and challenging over time.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards maintaining reliable and timely evaluations of large language models, which is crucial as these models continue to advance and become more widely deployed.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces two main strategies for updating benchmarks:
-
Mimicking Strategy: This approach generates new samples that are similar in style and context to the original benchmark data. The researchers use language models to capture the stylistic and contextual essence of the existing samples and then generate new samples that match these characteristics.
-
Extending Strategy: This strategy takes the existing benchmark samples and expands them to cover a wider range of cognitive difficulty levels. The researchers adapt Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives to systematically increase the complexity of the samples, covering different cognitive skills such as remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
The researchers conduct extensive experiments on updated versions of the MMLU and BIG-Bench benchmarks to evaluate the effectiveness of their proposed strategies. They find that the mimicking strategy can effectively address the issue of benchmark leakage, where models become too good at the original benchmark and their performance becomes inflated and unreliable. In cases where the mimicking strategy is not sufficient, the extending strategy shows promising results in maintaining the stability and difficulty control of the benchmark.
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the stability and difficulty control achieved by the proposed updating strategies. By controlling the cognitive difficulty of the new samples, the researchers demonstrate that the updated benchmarks can better discern the performance of language models and enable fine-grained analysis.
Overall, this work represents a significant contribution to the field of language model evaluation, as it introduces a systematic and automated approach to maintaining relevant and challenging benchmarks over time, addressing key issues such as benchmark leakage and difficulty control.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to automating the updating of natural language benchmarks. The proposed strategies, especially the mimicking approach, appear to be effective in addressing the issue of benchmark leakage and ensuring the continued relevance and reliability of the benchmarks.
One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the experiments, which focus primarily on the MMLU and BIG-Bench benchmarks. While these are prominent and widely used benchmarks, it would be valuable to see the proposed strategies applied to a broader range of benchmarks to assess their generalizability.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or limitations of the language models used to generate the new samples. It would be interesting to explore how the characteristics and biases of the underlying models might influence the quality and fairness of the updated benchmarks.
Furthermore, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational resources and time required to implement the proposed updating strategies. As the authors note, the need for continual curation of benchmarks is a significant challenge, and understanding the practical feasibility of their approach would be a valuable addition to the research.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper presents a compelling and innovative solution to a crucial problem in the field of large language model evaluation. The automated updating strategies and the focus on difficulty control and stability are important contributions that can pave the way for more reliable and insightful evaluations of these powerful models.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an automated approach to updating natural language benchmarks, addressing the challenges of benchmark leakage, difficulty control, and stability. The proposed mimicking and extending strategies offer effective solutions for generating new test samples that preserve the essence of the original benchmarks while expanding the cognitive complexity.
By automating the benchmark updating process, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more reliable and timely evaluations of large language models, which is crucial as these models continue to push the boundaries of natural language understanding and generation. The insights and techniques presented in this work have the potential to significantly impact the field of language model evaluation and contribute to the development of more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Models
Ruijie Xu, Zengzhi Wang, Run-Ze Fan, Pengfei Liu
0
0
Amid the expanding use of pre-training data, the phenomenon of benchmark dataset leakage has become increasingly prominent, exacerbated by opaque training processes and the often undisclosed inclusion of supervised data in contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs). This issue skews benchmark effectiveness and fosters potentially unfair comparisons, impeding the field's healthy development. To address this, we introduce a detection pipeline utilizing Perplexity and N-gram accuracy, two simple and scalable metrics that gauge a model's prediction precision on benchmark, to identify potential data leakages. By analyzing 31 LLMs under the context of mathematical reasoning, we reveal substantial instances of training even test set misuse, resulting in potentially unfair comparisons. These findings prompt us to offer several recommendations regarding model documentation, benchmark setup, and future evaluations. Notably, we propose the Benchmark Transparency Card to encourage clear documentation of benchmark utilization, promoting transparency and healthy developments of LLMs. we have made our leaderboard, pipeline implementation, and model predictions publicly available, fostering future research.
4/30/2024
āļø
Evaluating LLMs at Evaluating Temporal Generalization
Chenghao Zhu, Nuo Chen, Yufei Gao, Benyou Wang
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the urgent need for evolving evaluation methodologies that keep pace with improvements in language comprehension and information processing. However, traditional benchmarks, which are often static, fail to capture the continually changing information landscape, leading to a disparity between the perceived and actual effectiveness of LLMs in ever-changing real-world scenarios. Furthermore, these benchmarks do not adequately measure the models' capabilities over a broader temporal range or their adaptability over time. We examine current LLMs in terms of temporal generalization and bias, revealing that various temporal biases emerge in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction. This serves as a caution for LLM practitioners to pay closer attention to mitigating temporal biases. Also, we propose an evaluation framework Freshbench for dynamically generating benchmarks from the most recent real-world prognostication prediction. Our code is available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/FreshBench. The dataset will be released soon.
5/15/2024
Benchmark Data Contamination of Large Language Models: A Survey
Cheng Xu, Shuhao Guan, Derek Greene, M-Tahar Kechadi
0
0
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Claude-3, and Gemini has transformed the field of natural language processing. However, it has also resulted in a significant issue known as Benchmark Data Contamination (BDC). This occurs when language models inadvertently incorporate evaluation benchmark information from their training data, leading to inaccurate or unreliable performance during the evaluation phase of the process. This paper reviews the complex challenge of BDC in LLM evaluation and explores alternative assessment methods to mitigate the risks associated with traditional benchmarks. The paper also examines challenges and future directions in mitigating BDC risks, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the need for innovative solutions to ensure the reliability of LLM evaluation in real-world applications.
6/7/2024
š
Strategic Data Ordering: Enhancing Large Language Model Performance through Curriculum Learning
Jisu Kim, Juhwan Lee
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has improved text understanding and generation but poses challenges in computational resources. This study proposes a curriculum learning-inspired, data-centric training strategy that begins with simpler tasks and progresses to more complex ones, using criteria such as prompt length, attention scores, and loss values to structure the training data. Experiments with Mistral-7B (Jiang et al., 2023) and Gemma-7B (Team et al., 2024) models demonstrate that curriculum learning slightly improves performance compared to traditional random data shuffling. Notably, we observed that sorting data based on our proposed attention criteria generally led to better performance. This approach offers a sustainable method to enhance LLM performance without increasing model size or dataset volume, addressing scalability challenges in LLM training.
5/14/2024