Avoiding Pitfalls for Privacy Accounting of Subsampled Mechanisms under Composition

Overview

• This paper presents methods to avoid privacy accounting pitfalls when composing subsampled differential privacy mechanisms.
• The authors provide rigorous analysis and practical guidelines to help ensure accurate privacy guarantees when using subsampling techniques in differential privacy.
• Key contributions include new theoretical results, connections to existing work, and empirical demonstrations of the proposed techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Differential privacy is a powerful framework for protecting the privacy of individuals in data analysis and machine learning. It works by adding carefully calibrated random noise to the output of computations, ensuring that the results don't reveal too much about any one person's data.

Differential privacy via distributionally robust optimization is one way to achieve differential privacy, and subsampling is a common technique used to make these mechanisms more efficient. However, correctly accounting for the privacy loss when composing subsampled mechanisms can be tricky.

This paper tackles that challenge by providing new mathematical analysis and practical guidelines. The authors show how to properly track the privacy loss when chaining together multiple subsampled differentially private computations, ensuring that the overall privacy guarantee is accurately captured. They also demonstrate these techniques through empirical examples, helping practitioners apply the methods effectively.

By addressing these nuanced privacy accounting issues, the work helps make differential privacy more robust and reliable, supporting its broader adoption in real-world data-driven applications.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of the paper are:

1. New Theoretical Results: The authors derive tight composition theorems for subsampled differentially private mechanisms, providing improved privacy accounting over previous approaches. This includes novel privacy amplification bounds that quantify the privacy benefits of subsampling.

2. Connections to Existing Work: The paper establishes connections between their results and prior work on differential privacy, including universal exact compression of differentially private mechanisms and differentially private synthetic data generation. These connections yield insights and generalize the applicability of the proposed techniques.

3. Empirical Demonstrations: The authors provide experimental evaluations that showcase the practical benefits of their privacy accounting methods. They demonstrate how the techniques can improve the accuracy of differentially private algorithms, especially when composing multiple subsampled mechanisms.

The theoretical and empirical contributions of the paper help address key challenges in the rigorous application of differential privacy, supporting its use in real-world data analysis and machine learning tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive treatment of the privacy accounting challenges that can arise when composing subsampled differentially private mechanisms. The authors thoroughly analyze the problem, derive new theoretical results, and demonstrate the practical value of their approach.

One potential limitation is that the paper focuses primarily on subsampling techniques, whereas there are other approaches (e.g., differentially private projection depth-based medians) that could also benefit from improved privacy accounting methods. Extending the analysis to a broader class of differential privacy mechanisms could further broaden the impact of this work.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational complexity implications of the proposed privacy accounting methods. Understanding the tradeoffs between the tightness of the privacy bounds and the computational efficiency could inform practical deployment scenarios.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of differential privacy by providing rigorous theoretical analysis and practical guidance to help researchers and practitioners navigate the pitfalls of composing subsampled mechanisms.

Conclusion

This paper addresses an important challenge in the application of differential privacy: accurately accounting for privacy loss when composing subsampled mechanisms. The authors' theoretical analysis, connections to related work, and empirical demonstrations provide a comprehensive framework for practitioners to apply subsampling techniques while ensuring reliable privacy guarantees.

By addressing these nuanced privacy accounting issues, the work helps make differential privacy more robust and reliable, supporting its broader adoption in real-world data-driven applications, such as differentially private high-dimensional model selection. The insights and practical guidelines presented in this paper represent an important step forward in the practical application of differential privacy.